skip to main content
10.1145/1516241.1516322acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicuimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

XML data partitioning strategies to improve parallelism in parallel holistic twig joins

Published:15 February 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Parallel XML query processing systems that process numerous queries over large heterogeneous XML documents often experience under-performance due to workload imbalance and low CPU/system utilization, because conventional partitioning strategies cannot serve well for state-of-the-art query processing algorithms, such as holistic twig joins. Consequently, partitioning and distributing heterogeneous XML documents onto a parallel cluster system have lead to such an intricacy issue for maintaining good query performance. In this paper, we propose XML data partitioning strategies that are able to alleviate system performance degradation due to workload imbalance, especially for parallel holistic twig joins processing. The proposed XML data partitioning strategies aim at improving workload balance on both static data distribution and dynamic data distribution. In the first strategy we refine an XML partition having a high cost by series of XML data partition refinements with various levels of granularities from document, query, and subquery, up to node streams. The selection of the granularity level for refining a high cost partition is contextually dependent on the overall workload balance in the system. In the second strategy for dynamic data distribution, we dynamically handle low system utilization when there are many idle nodes in the system. We propose an XML data redistribution approach by partitioning XML data on the fly at the stream nodes-based granularity.

References

  1. Niagara query engine. http://www.cs.wisc.edu/niagara.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Stanford university infolab. http://infolab.stanford.edu/pub/movies/dtd.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. S. Al-Khalifa, H. V. Jagadish, J. M. Patel, Y. Wu, N. Koudas, and D. Srivastava. Structural Joins: A Primitive for Efficient XML Query Pattern Matching. In Proc. of the 18th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'02), pages 141--, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. T. Amagasa, K. Kido, and H. Kitagawa. Querying XML Data Using PC Cluster System. In Proc. of the International Workshops on XML Data Management Tools and Techniques (XANTEC'07), pages 5--9, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J.-M. Bremer and M. Gertz. On Distributing XML Repositories. In International Workshop on the Web and Databases (WebDB), pages 73--78, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. N. Bruno, N. Koudas, and D. Srivastava. Holistic Twig Joins: Optimal XML Pattern Matching. In Proc. of the 2002 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD'02), pages 310--321, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. T. Chen, J. Lu, and T. W. Ling. On Boosting Holism in XML Twig Pattern Matching Using Structural Indexing Techniques. In Proc. of the 24th ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD'05), pages 455--466, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R. Goldman and J. Widom. DataGuides: Enabling Query Formulation and Optimization in Semistructured Databases. In Proc. of 23rd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB'97), pages 436--445, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. G. Gou and R. Chirkova. Efficiently Querying Large XML Data Repositories: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 19(10):1381--1403, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. R. Kaushik, R. Krishnamurthy, J. F. Naughton, and R. Ramakrishnan. On the Integration of Structure Indexes and Inverted Lists. In Proc. of the 23rd ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD'04), pages 779--790, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. K. Kido, T. Amagasa, and H. Kitagawa. Processing XPath Queries in PC Clusters Using XML Data Partitioning. In Proc. of the 22nd ICDE Workshops, page 114, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. H. Kurita, K. Hatano, J. Miyazaki, and S. Uemura. Efficient Query Processing for Large XML Data in Distributed Environments. In Proc. of the 21st International Conference on Advanced Networking and Applications (AINA'07), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Y. G. Li, S. Bressan, G. Dobbie, Z. Lacroix, M. L. Lee, U. Nambiar, and B. Wadhwa. XOO7: Applying OO7 Benchmark to XML Query Processing Tool. In Proc. of the 10th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 167--174, New York, NY, USA, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Lu, T. Chen, and T. W. Ling. Efficient Processing of XML Twig Patterns with Parent Child Edges: A Look-ahead Approach. In Proc. of 13th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM'04), pages 533--542, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. K. Lu, Y. Zhu, and W. Sun. Parallel Processing XML Documents. In Proc. of International Database Engineering and Applications Symposium (IDEAS), pages 96--105, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. I. Machdi, T. Amagasa, and H. Kitagawa. GMX: An XML Data Partitioning Scheme for Holistic Twig Joins. In Proc. of 10th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications and Services (iiWAS'08), Linz, Austria, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. R. Sakellariou and J. R. Gurd. Compile-time Minimisation of Load Imbalance in Loop Nests. In Proc. of the 11th International Conference on Supercomputing, pages 277--284, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Schmidt, F. Waas, M. Kersten, M. J. Carey, I. Manolescu, and R. Busse. XMark: A Benchmark for XML Data Management. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pages 974--985. VLDB Endowment, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. N. Tang, G. Wang, X. J. Yu, K.-F. Wong, and G. Yu. WIN: An Efficient Data Placement Strategy for Parallel XML Databases. In Proc. of 11th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS), pages 249--355, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. H. Wang, S. Park, W. Fan, and P. S. Yu. Vist: A Dynamic Index Method for Querying XML Data by Tree Structures. In Proc. of the 22nd ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD'03), pages 110--121, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. C. Zhang, J. F. Naughton, D. J. DeWitt, Q. Luo, and G. M. Lohman. On Supporting Containment Queries in Relational Database Management Systems. In Proc. of the 2001 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data, pages 425--436, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. XML data partitioning strategies to improve parallelism in parallel holistic twig joins

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICUIMC '09: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication
      February 2009
      704 pages
      ISBN:9781605584058
      DOI:10.1145/1516241

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 February 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate251of941submissions,27%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader