skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1518736acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Predicting tie strength with social media

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social media treats all users the same: trusted friend or total stranger, with little or nothing in between. In reality, relationships fall everywhere along this spectrum, a topic social science has investigated for decades under the theme of tie strength. Our work bridges this gap between theory and practice. In this paper, we present a predictive model that maps social media data to tie strength. The model builds on a dataset of over 2,000 social media ties and performs quite well, distinguishing between strong and weak ties with over 85% accuracy. We complement these quantitative findings with interviews that unpack the relationships we could not predict. The paper concludes by illustrating how modeling tie strength can improve social media design elements, including privacy controls, message routing, friend introductions and information prioritization.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

1518736.mp4

mp4

181.8 MB

References

  1. Adamic, L. A. and Adar, E. 2003. Friends and neighbors on the Web. Social Networks, 25(3), 211--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Albert, R. and Barabási, A. L. 2002. Statistical Mechanics of Complex Networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P., et al. 1984. The Problem of Informant Accuracy: The Validity of Retrospective Data. Annual Review of Anthropology, 13, 495--517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Burt, R. S. 2004. Structural Holes and Good Ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349--399.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Burt, R. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chopra, S., Thampy, T., et al. Discovering the Hidden Structure of House Prices with a Non-parametric Latent Manifold Model. Proc. KDD, 2007. 173--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Clark, H. H. Arenas of Language Use. University Of Chicago Press, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Constant, D., Sproull, L., et al. 1996. The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice. Organization Science, 7(2), 119--135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Cunningham, W. H., Cunningham, I. C., et al. 1977. The Ipsative Process to Reduce Response Set Bias. Public Opinion Quaterly, 41(3), 379--384.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Frakes, W. B. and Baeza-Yates, R. Information Retrieval: Data Structures and Algorithms. Prentice Hall, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Friedkin, N. E. 1980. A Test of Structural Features of Granovetter's Strength of Weak Ties Theory. Social Networks, 2, 411--422.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Gergle, D., Kraut, R. E., et al. The Impact of Delayed Visual Feedback on Collaborative Performance. Proc. CHI, 2006. 1303--1312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gilbert, E., Karahalios, K., et al. The Network in the Garden: An Empirical Analysis of Social Media in Rural Life. Proc. CHI, 2008. 1603--1612. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Golder, S., Wilkinson, D. M., et al. Rhythms of Social Interaction: Messaging Within a Massive Online Network. Proc. 3rd International Conference on Communities and Technologies (CT2007), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Google Scholar. (http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=weak+ties. Accessed September 16, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Granovetter, M. 1983. The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201--233.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Granovetter, M. S. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360--1380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Granovetter, M. Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. University Of Chicago Press, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Greasemonkey. http://www.greasespot.net. Accessed September 16, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Hansen, M. T. 1999. The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge Across Organization Subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82--111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Haythornthwaite, C. 2002. Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media. Information Society, 18(5), 385--401.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Haythornthwaite, C. and Wellman, B. 1998. Work, Friendship, and Media Use for Information Exchange in a Networked Organization. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 49(12), 1101--1114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Krackhardt, D. The Strength of Strong Ties: The Importance of Philos in Organizations. In N. Nohria and R. Eccles (Ed.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action (216--239). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Krackhardt, D. and Stern, R. N. 1988. Informal Networks and Organizational Crises: An Experimental Simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(2), 123--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Lampe, C., Ellison, N., et al. Changes in Participation and Perception of Facebook. Proc. CSCW, 2008. 721--730. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., et al. 1989. Monitoring the AIDS Epidemic in the United States: A Network Approach. Science, 244(4909), 1186--1189.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Liben-Nowell, D. and Kleinberg, J. The Link Prediction Problem for Social Networks. Proc. of the 12th international conference on Information and knowledge management, 2003. 556--559. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Lin, N., Dayton, P. W., et al. 1978. Analyzing the Instrumental Use of Relations in the Context of Social Structure. Sociological Methods Research, 7(2), 149--166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Lin, N., Ensel, W. M., et al. 1981. Social Resources and Strength of Ties: Structural Factors in Occupational Status Attainment. American Sociological Review, 46(4), 393--405.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Marin, A. 1981. Are Respondents More Likely To List Alters with Certain Characteristics?: Implications for Name Generator Data. Social Networks, 26(4), 289--307.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Marsden, P. V. 1981. Core Discussion Networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52(1), 122--131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Marsden, P. V. 1990. Network Data and Measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16(1), 435--463.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Marsden, P. V. and Campbell, K. E. 1990. Measuring Tie Strength. Social Forces, 63(2), 482--501.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Pennebaker, J. W. and Francis, M. E. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Lawrence Erlbaum, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Rapleaf. RapLeaf Study of Social Network Users vs. Age. http://business.rapleaf.com/company_press_2008_(06_18.html. Accessed September 16, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Schaefer, C., Coyne, J. C., et al. 1990. The Health-related Functions of Social Support. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(4), 381--406.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Shi, X., Adamic, L. A., et al. 2007. Networks of Strong Ties. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 378(1), 33--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Tahmincioglu, E. Facebook Friends As Job References? http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26223330. Accessed September 16, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Uzzi, B. 1999. Embeddedness in the Making of Financial Capital: How Social Relations and Networks Benefit Firms Seeking Financing. American Sociological Review, 64(4), 481--505.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Wellman, B. and Wortley, S. 1990. Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support. The American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 558--588.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Whittaker, S., Terveen, L., et al. The Dynamics of Mass Interaction. Proc. CSCW, 1998. 257--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Predicting tie strength with social media

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2426 pages
      ISBN:9781605582467
      DOI:10.1145/1518701

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader