skip to main content
10.1145/1526709.1526744acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Adaptive bidding for display advertising

Published:20 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Motivated by the emergence of auction-based marketplaces for display ads such as the Right Media Exchange, we study the design of a bidding agent that implements a display advertising campaign by bidding in such a marketplace. The bidding agent must acquire a given number of impressions with a given target spend, when the highest external bid in the marketplace is drawn from an unknown distribution P. The quantity and spend constraints arise from the fact that display ads are usually sold on a CPM basis. We consider both the full information setting, where the winning price in each auction is announced publicly, and the partially observable setting where only the winner obtains information about the distribution; these differ in the penalty incurred by the agent while attempting to learn the distribution. We provide algorithms for both settings, and prove performance guarantees using bounds on uniform closeness from statistics, and techniques from online learning. We experimentally evaluate these algorithms: both algorithms perform very well with respect to both target quantity and spend; further, our algorithm for the partially observable case performs nearly as well as that for the fully observable setting despite the higher penalty incurred during learning.

References

  1. P. Auer, N. Cesa-Bianchi, and P. Fischer. Finite-time analysis of the multi-armed bandit problem. Machine Learning, 47:235--256, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Cary, A. Das, B. Edelman, I. Giotis, K. Heimerl, A. Karlin, C. Mathieu, and M. Schwarz. Greedy bidding strategies for keyword auctions. In ACM EC, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. N. Cesa-Bianchi and G. Lugosi. Prediction, Learning, and Games. Cambridge University Press, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Dvoretzky, J. Kiefer, and J. Wolfowitz. Asymptotic minimax character of the sample distribution function and of the classical multinomial estimator. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 27(3):642--669, 1956.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. N. Littlestone and M. K. Warmuth. The weighted majority algorithm. Information and Computation, 108(2):212--261, February 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Zinkevich. Online convex programming and generalized infinitesimal gradient ascent. In ICML, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Adaptive bidding for display advertising

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader