skip to main content
10.1145/1529282.1529513acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Latency-aware leader election

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 March 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Experimental studies have shown that electing a leader based on measurements of the underlying communication network can be beneficial. We use this approach to study the problem of electing a leader that is eventually not only correct (as captured by the Ω failure detector abstraction), but also optimal with respect to the transmission delays to its peers. We give the definitions of this problem and a suitable model, thus allowing us to make an analytical analysis of the problem, which is in contrast to previous work on that topic.

References

  1. M. K. Aguilera, C. Delporte-Gallet, H. Fauconnier, and S. Toueg. Stable leader election. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Distributed Computing (DISC'01), pages 108--122. Springer-Verlag, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. K. Aguilera, C. Delporte-Gallet, H. Fauconnier, and S. Toueg. On implementing Omega with weak reliability and synchrony assumptions. In Proceeding of the 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC'03). ACM Press, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. K. Aguilera, C. Delporte-Gallet, H. Fauconnier, and S. Toueg. Communication-efficient leader election and consensus with limited link synchrony. In Proceeding of the 23rd Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC'04), pages 328--337, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada, 2004. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Hutle, D. Malkhi, U. Schmid, and L. Zhou. Brief announcement: Chasing the weakest system model for implementing Ω and consensus. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems (SSS '06), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. L. Lamport. The part-time parliament. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 16(2): 133--169, May 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. Malkhi, F. Oprea, and L. Zhou. Ω meets paxos: Leader election and stability without eventual timely links. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Distributed Computing (DISC'05), pages 199--213, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. L. Sampaio and F. Brasileiro. Adaptive indulgent consensus. In Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN 2005), pages 422--431, Yokohama, Japan, 2005. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. L. Sampaio, R. C. Nunes, F. Brasileiro, and I. Jansch-Pôrto. Efficient and robust adaptive consensus services based on oracles. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society (JBCS), Special Issue on Dependable Computing (2005), 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. L. M. R. Sampaio, F. V. Brasileiro, W. Cirne, and J. C. A. Figueiredo. How bad are wrong suspicions? towards adaptive distributed protocols. In Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN 2003), pages 551--560, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2003. IEEE Computer Society.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Latency-aware leader election

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SAC '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing
        March 2009
        2347 pages
        ISBN:9781605581668
        DOI:10.1145/1529282

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 March 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader