skip to main content
research-article

Medium access controlfacing the reality of WSN deployments

Published:30 June 2009Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Although research on algorithms and communication protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) has yielded a tremendous effort so far, most of these protocols are hardly used in real deployments nowadays. Several reasons have been put forward in recent publications. In this paper, we further investigate this trend from a Medium Access Control (MAC) perspective by analyzing both the reasons behind successful deployments and the characteristics of the MAC layers proposed in the literature. The effort allocated to develop suitable protocols from scratch every new deployment could however be minimized by using already existing contributions which provide code reuse and adaptive protocols. Though we advocate their use for nowadays deployments, we have identified several shortcomings in foreseen scenarios for which we provide guidelines for future researches.

References

  1. G. Werner-Allen, K. Lorincz, M. Welsh, O. Marcillo, J. Johnson, M. Ruiz, and J. Lees, "Deploying a wireless sensor network on an active volcano," IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 10, pp. 18--25, March/April 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Mainwaring, D. Culler, J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, and J. Anderson, "Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring," in WSNA '02: 1st International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications, pp. 88--97, ACM, September 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Kim, S. Pakzad, D. Culler, J. Demmel, G. Fenves, S. Glaser, and M. Turon, "Health monitoring of civil infrastructures using wireless sensor networks," in IPSN'07: 6th Int. Conf. on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pp. 254--263, ACM, April 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. I.F. Akyildiz et al., "A survey on sensor networks," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 40, pp. 102--114, August 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. B. Raman and K. Chebrolu, "Censor networks: A critique of "sensor networks" from a systems perspective," ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 38, pp. 75--78, July 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. G. Barrenetxea, F. Ingelrest, G. Schaefer, M. Vetterli, O. Couach, and M. Parlange, "Sensorscope: Out-of-the-box environmental monitoring," in IPSN '08: 7th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pp. 332--343, ACM/IEEE, April 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. T. He, S. Krishnamurthy, J.A. Stankovic, T. Abdelzaher, L. Luo, R. Stoleru, T. Yan, L. Gu, J. Hui, and B. Krogh, "Energy-efficient surveillance system using wireless sensor networks," in MobiSys '04: Int. Conf. on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, pp. 270--283, ACM, June 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Allred, A.B. Hasan, S. Panichsakul, W. Pisano, P. Gray, J. Huang, R. Han, D. Lawrence, and K. Mohseni, "Sensorflock: an airborne wireless sensor network of micro-air vehicles," in SenSys '07: 5th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 117--129, ACM, November 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. P. Zhang, C.M. Sadler, S.A. Lyon, and M.M. tonosi, "Hardware design experiences in zebranet," in SenSys '04: 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 227--238, ACM, November 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. B. Thorstensen, T. Syversen, T.-A. Bjørnvold, and T. Walseth, "Electronic shepherd -- a low-cost, low-bandwidth, wireless network system," in MobiSys '04: International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, pp. 245--255, ACM, June 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. K. Dantu, M. Rahimi, H. Shah, S. Babel, A. Dhariwal, and G.S. Sukhatme, "Robomote: Enabling mobility in sensor networks," in IPSN '05: 4th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pp. 404--409, ACM, April 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Ali, U. Saif, A. Dunkels, T. Voigt, K. Römer, K. Langendoen, J. Polastre, and Z. A. Uzmi, "Medium access control issues in sensor networks," ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 36, pp. 33--36, April 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. I. Demirkol et al., "Mac protocols for wireless sensor networks: A survey," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 44, pp. 115--121, April 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Polastre, J. Hill, and D. Culler, "Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks," in SenSys '04: 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 95--107, ACM, November 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. W. Ye, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin, "Medium access control with coordinated adaptive sleeping for wireless sensor networks," IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 12, pp. 493--506, June 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. IEEE, "Part 15.4: Wireless medium access control (mac) and physical layer (phy) specifications for low-rate wireless personal area networks (wpans)," September 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. V. Rajendran, K. Obraczka, and J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, "Energy-efficient, collision-free medium access control for wireless sensor networks," in SenSys '03: 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 181--192, ACM, November 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. G. Lu, B. Krishnamachari, and C.S. Raghavendra, "An adaptive energy-efficient and low-latency mac for data gathering in wireless sensor networks," in IPDPS '04: 18th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, pp. 224--231, IEEE, April 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Ci, H. Sharif, and D. Peng, "An effective scheme for energy efficiency in mobile wireless sensor networks," in ICC '04: International Conference on Communications, vol. 6, pp. 3486--3490, IEEE, June 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. P. Lin, C. Qiao, and X. Wang, "Medium access control with a dynamic duty cycle for sensor networks," in WCNC'04: Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, vol. 3, pp. 1534--1539, IEEE, March 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. I. Rhee, A. Warrier, M. Aia, and J. Min, "Z-mac: a hybrid mac for wireless sensor networks," in SenSys '05: 3rd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 90--101, ACM, November 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. G.-S. Ahn, S.G. Hong, E. Miluzzo, A.T. Campbell, and F. Cuomo, "Funneling-mac: a localized, sink-oriented mac for boosting fidelity in sensor networks," in SenSys '06: 4th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 293--306, ACM, October 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. W. Ye, F. Silva, and J. Heidemann, "Ultra-low duty cycle mac with scheduled channel polling," in SenSys '06: 4th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 321--334, ACM, October 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. A. Raja and X. Su, "A mobility adaptive hybrid protocol for wireless sensor networks," in CCNC '08: 5th Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, pp. 692--696, IEEE, January 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. R. Cardell-Oliver, K. Smettem, M. Kranz, and K. Mayer, "Field testing a wireless sensor network for reactive environmental monitoring," in ISSNIP '04: Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing Conference, pp. 7--12, IEEE, December 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. G. Tolle, J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, D. Culler, N. Turner, K. Tu, S. Burgess, T. Dawson, P. Buonadonna, D. Gay, and W. Hong, "A macroscope in the redwoods," in SenSys '05: 3rd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 51--63, ACM, November 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. R. Szewczyk, A. Mainwaring, J. Polastre, J. Anderson, and D. Culler, "An analysis of a large scale habitat monitoring application," in SenSys '04: 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 214--226, ACM, November 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. K. Langendoen, A. Baggio, and O. Visser, "Murphy loves potatoes: Experiences from a pilot sensor network deployment in precision agriculture," in IPDPS '06: 20th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, pp. 8--15, IEEE, April 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. K. Klues, G. Hackmann, O. Chipara, and C. Lu, "A component based architecture for power-efficient media access control in wireless sensor networks," in SenSys '07: 5rd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 59--72, ACM, November 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. V. Shnayder et al., "Sensor networks for medical care," in Technical Report TR-08-05, Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. P. Dutta, D. Culler, and S. Shenker, "Procrastination might lead to a longer and more useful life," in HotNets-VI: Sixth Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, ACM, November 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. K. Römer and F. Mattern, "The design space of wireless sensor networks," IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 11, pp. 54--61, December 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. E. Meshkova, J. Riihijärvi, J. Ansari, K. Rerkrai, and P. Mähönen, "An extendible meta-data specification for component-oriented networks with applications to wsn configuration and optimization," in PIMRC '08: Int. Symp. on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, (Cannes, France), IEEE, September 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. A. Dunkels, N. Finne, J. Eriksson, and T. Voigt, "Run-time dynamic linking for reprogramming wireless sensor networks," in SenSys '06: 4th Int. Conf. on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 15--28, ACM, October 2006 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Medium access controlfacing the reality of WSN deployments

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
      ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 39, Issue 3
      July 2009
      46 pages
      ISSN:0146-4833
      DOI:10.1145/1568613
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2009 Authors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 June 2009

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader