skip to main content
10.1145/1592748.1592752acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Argo: intelligent advertising by mining a user's interest from his photo collections

Published:28 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we introduce a system named Argo which provides intelligent advertising made possible from users' photo collections. Based on the intuition that user-generated photos imply user interests which are the key for profitable targeted ads, the Argo system attempts to learn a user's profile from his shared photos and suggests relevant ads accordingly. To learn a user interest, in an offline step, a hierarchical and efficient topic space is constructed based on the ODP ontology, which is used later on for bridging the vocabulary gap between ads and photos as well as reducing the effect of noisy photo tags. In the online stage, the process of Argo contains three steps: 1) understanding the content and semantics of a user's photos and auto-tagging each photo to supplement user-submitted tags (such tags may not be available); 2) learning the user interest given a set of photos based on the learnt hierarchical topic space; and 3) representing ads in the topic space and matching their topic distributions with the target user interest; the top ranked ads are output as the suggested ads. Two key challenges are tackled during the process: 1) the semantic gap between the low-level image visual features and the high-level user semantics; and 2) the vocabulary impedance between photos and ads. We conducted a series of experiments based on real Flickr users and Amazon.com products (as candidate ads), which show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

References

  1. Badi, R. Recognition and Representation of User Interest. Master Thesis, Texas A&M University, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Broder, A., Fontoura, M., et al. A Semantic Approach to Contextual Advertising. SIGIR, pp. 559--566, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chen C., Chen M., and Sun Y. PVA: A Self-Adaptive Personal View Agent. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, p. 173--194, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chen, Y., Xue, G.-R., and Yu, Y. Advertising Keyword Suggestion Based On Concept Hierarchy, In Proc. of ACM WSDM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Crandall, D., Backstrom, L., et al. Mapping the World's Photos. WWW, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Evans, A., Fernandez, M., et al. Adaptive Multimedia Access: From User Needs Semantic Personalization. In Proc. Of IEEE Int. Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Google AdWords Keyword Tool. https://adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Grcar, M., Mladenic, D., and Grobelnik, M. User Profiling for Interest-focused Browsing History. UserSWeb, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gunduz, S., and Ozsu, M. A User Interest Model for Web Page Navigation. In Proc. of Int. Workshop on Data Mining for Actionable Knowledge (DMAK), Seoul, Korea, April, pages 46--57, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hua, X.-S., Mei, T., and Li, S. P. When Multimedia Advertising Meets the New Internet Era. Intl Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, pp. 1--5, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jing, F., Li, M. et al. Learning Region Weighting from Relevance Feedback in Image Retrieval. In Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics Speech and Signal, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Joshi, A., and Motwani, R. Keyword Generation for Search Engine Advertising. In Proc. of the 6th IEEE Int. Conf. on Data Mining --- Workshops. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kim, H. R., and Chan, P. K. Learning Implicit User Interest Hierarchy for Context in Personalization. In Proc. of International Conference on Intelligent User Interface, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lacerda, A., Cristo, M., et al. Learning to Advertise. SIGIR, pp. 549--556, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Letizia, L. H. An Agent That Assists Web Browsing. In Proc. of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, CA, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Li, X., Guo, L., and Zhao, Y. Tag-based Social Interest Discovery. WWW, pp. 675--684. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Li Z., Zhang L., Ma W.-Y. Delivering Online Advertisements Inside Images, In Proc. of ACM Multimedia, Vancouver, Canada, October 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ma, Z., Pant, G., and Sheng, O. Interest-Based Personalized Search. ACM Trans. on Information Systems, vol. 25(1), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Middleton S., De Roure D., and Shadbolt N. Capturing Knowledge of User Preferences: Ontologies in Recommender Systems. In Proc. of the 1st International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-Cap2001), Victoria, BC Canada, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Murdock, V., Ciaramita, M., and Plachouras, V. A Noisy-Channel Approach to Contextual Advertising. ADKDD, pp. 21--28, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Plangprasopchok, A., and Lerman, K. Constructing Folksonomies from User-Specificed Relations on Flickr. WWW, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Ribeiro-Neto, B., Cristo, M., et al. Impedance Coupling in Con-tent-targeted Advertising. SIGIR, pp. 496--503, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Trajkova, J., and Gauch, S. Improving Ontology-Based User Profiles. In Proc. of RIAO, pp. 380--389, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang, X.-J., Zhang, L., et al. Annotating Images by Mining Image Search Results. T-PAMI, vol. 30(11), pp. 1919--1932, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. WordTracker. http://www.wordtracker.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhou, X., Wu, S.-T., et al. Utilizing Search Intent in Topic Ontology-based User Profile for Web Mining. In Proc. Of IEEE Int. Conf. on Web Intelligence, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Argo: intelligent advertising by mining a user's interest from his photo collections

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              ADKDD '09: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Data Mining and Audience Intelligence for Advertising
              June 2009
              97 pages
              ISBN:9781605586717
              DOI:10.1145/1592748

              Copyright © 2009 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 28 June 2009

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate12of21submissions,57%

              Upcoming Conference

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader