M.P.S. To
Abstract
Visual Difference Predictor (VDP) models have played a key role in digital image applications such as the development of image quality metrics. However, little attention has been paid to their applicability to peripheral vision. Central (i.e., foveal) vision is extremely sensitive for the contrast detection of simple stimuli such as sinusoidal gratings, but peripheral vision is less sensitive. Furthermore, crowding is a well-documented phenomenon whereby differences in suprathreshold peripherally viewed target objects (such as individual letters or patches of sinusoidal grating) become more difficult to discriminate when surrounded by other objects (flankers). We examine three factors that might influence the degree of crowding with natural-scene stimuli (cropped from photographs of natural scenes): (1) location in the visual field, (2) distance between target and flankers, and (3) flanker-target similarity. We ask how these factors affect crowding in a suprathreshold discrimination experiment where observers rate the perceived differences between two sequentially presented target patches of natural images. The targets might differ in the shape, size, arrangement, or color of items in the scenes. Changes in uncrowded peripheral targets are perceived to be less than for the same changes viewed foveally. Consistent with previous research on simple stimuli, we find that crowding in the periphery (but not in the fovea) reduces the magnitudes of perceived changes even further, especially when the flankers are closer and more similar to the target. We have tested VDP models based on the response behavior of neurons in visual cortex and the inhibitory interactions between them. The models do not explain the lower ratings for peripherally viewed changes even when the lower peripheral contrast sensitivity was accounted for; nor could they explain the effects of crowding, which others have suggested might arise from errors in the spatial localization of features in the peripheral image. This suggests that conventional VDP models do not port well to peripheral vision.
- Azzopardi, P. and Cowey, A. 1993. Preferential representation of the fovea in the primary visual cortex. Nature 361, 719--721.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Bouma, H. 1970. Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature 226, 177--178.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daly, S. 1993. The visible differences predictor: An algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. In Digital Images and Human Vision. A. B. Watson, Ed. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 179--206. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Doll, T. J., McWorter, S. W., Wasilewski, A. A. and Schmieder, D. E. 1998. Robust, sensor-independent target detection and recognition based on computational models of human vision. Optical Engin. 37, 2006--2021.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Duncan, J. and Humphreys, G. W. 1989. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychol. Rev. 96, 433--458Google ScholarCross Ref
- Duncan, R. O. and Boynton, G. M. 2003. Cortical magnification within human primary visual cortex correlates with acuity thresholds. Neuron 38, 659--671.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Horton, J. C. and Hoyt, W. F. 1991. The representation of the visual field human striate cortex: A revision of the classical Holmes map. Arch. Ophthalmol. 109, 816--824.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Levi, D. M. 2008. Crowding—An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review. Vis. Res. 48, 635--654.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Levi, D. M., Klein, S. A. and Aitsebaomo, P. 1985. Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification. Vis. Res. 25, 963--977.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lovell, P. G., Párraga, C. A., Ripamonti, C., Troscianko, T. and Tolhurst, D. J. 2006. Evaluation of a multi-scale color model for visual difference prediction. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 3, 155--178. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lubin, J. 1995. A visual discrimination model for imaging system design and evaluation. In Vision Models for Target Detection and Recognition, E. Peli, Ed. World Scientific, Singapore, 245--283.Google Scholar
- Movshon, J. A., Thompson, I. D. and Tolhurst, D. J. 1978. Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity of neurones in Areas 17 and 18 of the cat's visual cortex. J. Phys. 283, 101--120.Google Scholar
- Mullen, K. T., and Kingdom, F. A. A. 2002. Differential distributions of red-green and blue-yellow cone opponency across the visual field. Vis. Neurosci. 19, 1--10.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Párraga, C. A., Troscianko, T., and Tolhurst, D. J. 2005. The effects of amplitude-spectrum statistics on foveal and peripheral discrimination of changes in natural images, and a multi-resolution model. Vis. Res. 45, 3145--3168.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pelli, D. G. and Tillman, K. A. 2008. The uncrowded window of object recognition. Nature Neurosci. 11, 1129--1135.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Põder, E. and Wagemans, J. 2007. Crowding with conjunctions of simple features. J. Vis. 7, 23, 1--12.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Popovic, Z. and Sjostrand, J. 2001. Resolution, separation of retinal ganglion cells, and cortical magnification in humans. Vis. Res. 41, 1313--1319.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ripamonti, C., Tolhurst, D. J., Lovell, P. G. and Troscianko, T. 2005. Magnification factors in a V1 model of natural-image discrimination. J. Vis. 5, 595a.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rohaly, A. M., Ahumada, A. J., and Watson, A. B. 1997. Object detection in natural backgrounds predicted by discrimination performance and models. Vis. Res. 37, 3225--3235.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Saadane, A. 2007. Toward a unified fidelity metric of still-coded images. J. Electron. Imag. 16, 013005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schultze, M. 1866. Zur anatomie und physiologie der retina. Archiv für Mikroskopische Anatomie 2, 175--286.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thibos, L. N., Still, D. L., and Bradley, A. 1996. Characterization of spatial aliasing and contrast sensitivity in peripheral vision. Vis. Res. 36, 249--258.Google ScholarCross Ref
- To, M., Lovell, P. G., Troscianko, T., and Tolhurst, D. J. 2007. Visual difference predictor models for human suprathreshold ratings of differences between natural images: Complex-Cell models outperform simple-cell models. Perception 36, 157.Google Scholar
- To, M., Lovell, P. G., Troscianko, T., and Tolhurst, D.J. 2008. Summation of perceptual cues in natural visual scenes. Proc. Royal Soc. B 275, 2299--2308.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Toet, A., Levi, D. M. 1992. The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea. Vis. Res. 32, 1349--1357.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tolhurst, D. J. and Ling, L. 1988. Magnification factors and the organization of the human striate cortex. Hum. Neurobiol. 6, 247--254.Google Scholar
- Van Essen, D. C. Newsome, W. T., and Maunsell, J. H. 1984. The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey. Vis. Res. 24, 429--448.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Watson, A. B. 1987. Efficiency of a model human image code. J. Optical Soc. Amer. A 4, 2401--2417.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Watson, A. B. and Ahumada, A. J. 2005. A standard model for foveal detection of spatial contrast. J. Vis. 5, 717--740.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Watson, A. B. and Solomon, J. A. 1997. Model of visual contrast gain control and pattern masking. J. Optical Soc. Amer. A 14, 2379--2391.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Perception of differences in natural-image stimuli: Why is peripheral viewing poorer than foveal?
Recommendations
Investigating perception time in the far peripheral vision for virtual and augmented reality
SAP '18: Proceedings of the 15th ACM Symposium on Applied PerceptionFar peripheral vision (beyond 60° eccentricity) is beginning to be supported in the latest virtual and augmented reality (VR and AR) headsets. This benefits the VR and AR experiences by allowing a greater amount of information to be conveyed, reducing ...
Evaluation of a multiscale color model for visual difference prediction
How different are two images when viewed by a human observer? There is a class of computational models which attempt to predict perceived differences between subtly different images. These are derived from theoretical considerations of human vision and ...
Object displays for identifying multidimensional outliers within a crowded visual periphery
This article discusses the human ability to detect, locate, or identify objects and their features using peripheral vision. The potential of peripheral vision is underused with user interfaces probably due to the limits of visual acuity. Peripheral ...
Comments