skip to main content
10.1145/1613858.1613902acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

User acceptance of mobile TV services

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 September 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mobile digital television technology facilitates broadcast TV on a mobile phone as well as interactive add-on services provided on top of the selected TV channel. In this paper we describe the results of a six-month field trial where 27 users were evaluating commercially available mobile TV services and 10 different pilot services. Mobile TV found a role in the everyday lives of the users as an extension to ordinary TV. The users appreciated easy and continuous access to TV contents. The results highlight that short usage situations typical to mobile TV use are hindering the adoption of new add-on services. The adoption can be supported by using content, appearance or functionality familiar from other media. The main problems with add-on services were related to knowing about the mere existence of these services and their contents as well as understanding the concept of services available only during a certain TV show.

References

  1. Cui, Y., Chipchase, J. and Jung, Y. 2007. Personal TV: A Qualitative Study of Mobile TV Users. In Cesar, P., Chorianopoulos, K. and Jensen, J. F. (eds.) Interactive TV: A Shared Experience. Proceedings of 5th European Conference, EuroITV 2007. Springer, 195--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Hübel, A. K., Theilmann, J. and Theilmann, U. 2007. "I Just Want to See the News" -- Interactivity in Mobile Environments. In Cesar, P., Chorianopoulos, K. and Jensen, J. F. (eds.) 2007. Interactive TV: A Shared Experience. Proceedings of 5th European Conference, EuroITV 2007. Springer, 205--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Dowell B. 2006. Viewing habits shift into the bedroom. http://technology.guardian.co.uk/print/0,329451221-117802,00.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Feldmann, V. 2005. Leveraging Mobile Media: Cross-media Strategy and Innovation Policy for Mobile Media Communication. New York: Physica-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Grobel, J. 2006. Mobile Mass Media: A New Age for Consumers, Business, and Society? In Groebel, J., Noel, E., Feldmann, V. (eds.) Mobile Media. Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jung, Y., Perez-Mira, B. and Wiley-Patton, S. 2009. Consumer adoption of mobile TV: Examining psychological flow and media content. Computers in Human Behaviour 25 (2009), 123--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kaasinen, E. 2008. User Acceptance of Mobile Services. In Lumsden, J. (ed.) Handbook of Research on User Interface Design and Evaluation for Mobile Technology. IGI Global. Hershey, London. Vol. 1 (2008), 102--121.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Knoche, H. and McCarthy, J. D. 2004. Mobile Users' Needs and Expectations of Future Multimedia Services. Proceedings of WWRF12, 10--12 Nov 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Knoche, H. 2005. A User-centred Mobile Television Consumption Paradigm. Proceedings of Human Centred Technology Workshop, 28--29 June, Brighton, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Loebbecke, C., Huyskens, C. and Järvenpää, S. 2008. Adoption of Mobile TV Services Among Early Users: Convergence of Familiar Technologies and Emergence of Technology Induced Paradoxes. In Proc. 7th International Conference on Mobile Business. IEEE Press, 231--239. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Mäki, J. 2005. Finnish Mobile TV Pilot, Results. http://www.finnishmobiletv.com/press/Final_RI_Press_300805_english.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Oksman, V., Noppari, E., Tammela, A., Mäkinen, M. and Ollikainen, V. 2007. Mobile TV in Everyday Contexts -- Individual Entertainment or Shared Experiences? In Cesar, P., Chorianopoulos, K. and Jensen, J. F. (eds.) Interactive TV: A Shared Experience. Proceedings of 5th European Conference, EuroITV 2007. Springer, 215--225. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Oksman, V., Ollikainen, V., Noppari, E., Herrero, C. and Tammela, A. 2008. 'Podracing': Experimenting with mobile TV content consumption and delivery methods. Multimedia Systems journal, Vol. 14, No. 2, 105--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Picard, R. G. 2005. Mobile Telephony and Broadcasting: Are They Compatible for Consumers. International Journal of Mobile Communications, Vol. 3., No. 1, 19--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Schatz, R., Wagner, S., Egger, S. and Jordan, N. 2007. Mobile TV Becomes Social -- Integrating Content with Communications. In Proceedings of the ITI 2007 Conference. June 25--28, 2007, Croatia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Södergard, C. (ed.) 2003. Mobile Television -- Technology and User Experiences. Report on the Mobile-TV project. VTT Publications 506. http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/publications/2003/P506.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. User acceptance of mobile TV services

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MobileHCI '09: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
      September 2009
      473 pages
      ISBN:9781605582818
      DOI:10.1145/1613858

      Copyright © 2009 Copyright is held by the author/owner(s).

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 September 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      MobileHCI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate23of95submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader