skip to main content
10.1145/1614293.1614304acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Stanford OpenRoads deployment

Published:21 September 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

We have built and deployed OpenRoads [11], a testbed that allows multiple network experiments to be conducted concurrently in a production network. For example, multiple routing protocols, mobility managers and network access controllers can run simultaneously in the same network. In this paper, we describe and discuss our deployment of the testbed at Stanford University. We focus on the challenges we faced deploying in a production network, and the tools we built to overcome these challenges. Our goal is to gain enough experience for other groups to deploy OpenRoads in their campus network.

References

  1. FlowVisor. http://www.openflowswitch.org/wk/index.php/FlowVisor.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. OpenFlow AP with PC Engine. http://www.openflowswitch.org/wk/index.php/OpenFlow_AP_with_PC_Engine.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Openseer data graphing tool. http://www.openflowswitch.org/wk/index.php/Deployment.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Bicket, D. Aguayo, S. Biswas, and R. Morris. Architecture and evaluation of an unplanned 802.11b mesh network. In MobiCom '05: Proceedings of the 11th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, pages 31--42, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Tunneling Software for OpenFlow Deployment. http://www.openflowswitch.org/wk/index.php/Tunneling_Software_for_OpenFlow_Deployment.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. GENI.net Global Environment for Network Innovations. http://www.geni.net.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. N. Gude, T. Koponen, J. Pettit, B. Pfaff, M. Casado, N. McKeown, and S. Shenker. NOX: Towards and operating system for networks. In ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, July 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. G. C. Hadjichristofi, A. Brender, M. Gruteser, R. Mahindra, and I. Seskar. A wired-wireless testbed architecture for network layer experimentation based on orbit and vini. In WinTECH '07: Proceedings of the the second ACM international workshop on Wireless network testbeds, experimental evaluation and characterization, pages 83--90, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. hsing Hsu, U. Kremer, and P. P. Models. Iperf: A framework for automatic construction of performance prediction models. In In Workshop on Profile and Feedback-Directed Compilation (PFDC, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. R. P. Karrer, I. Matyasovszki, A. Botta, and A. Pescapé. Experimental evaluation and characterization of the magnets wireless backbone. In WiNTECH '06: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on Wireless network testbeds, experimental evaluation&characterization, pages 26--33, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kok-Kiong Yap, Masayoshi Kobayashi, Rob Sherwood, Nikhil Handigol, Te-Yuan Huang, Michael Chan, and Nick McKeown. OpenRoads: Empowering research in mobile networks. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM (Poster), Barcelona, Spain, August 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. N. McKeown, T. Anderson, H. Balakrishnan, G. Parulkar, L. Peterson, J. Rexford, S. Shenker, and J. Turner. OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(2):69--74, April 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. NOX: An OpenFlow Controller. http://noxrepo.org/wp/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. The OpenFlow Switch Consortium. http://www.openflowswitch.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. An open platform for developing, deploying, and accessing planetary-scale services. http://www.planet-lab.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Purdue wireless mesh network. https://engineering.purdue.edu/mesh.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. D. Raychaudhuri, I. Seskar, M. Ott, S. Ganu, K. Ramach, H. Kremo, R. Siracusa, H. Liu, and M. Singh. Overview of the orbit radio grid testbed for evaluation of next-generation wireless network protocols. In in Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pages 1664--1669, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Rob Sherwood, Michael Chan,Glen Gibb, Nikhil Handigol,Te-Yuan Huang,Peyman Kazemian,Masayoshi Kobayashi, David Underhill, Kok-Kiong Yap, and Nick McKeown. Carving research slices out of your production networks with OpenFlow. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM (Demo), Barcelona, Spain, August 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Y. Su and T. Gross. Validation of a miniaturized wireless network testbed. In WiNTECH '08: Proceedings of the third ACM international workshop on Wireless network testbeds, experimental evaluation and characterization, pages 25--32, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. D. Underhill. An Extensible Network Visualization and Control Framework. Master's thesis, Stanford University, May 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. D. Underhill et al. Network monitor. http://www.openflowswitch.org/wp/gui.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. N. H. Vaidya, J. Bernhard, V. V. Veeravalli, P. R. Kumar, and R. K. Iyer. Illinois wireless wind tunnel: a testbed for experimental evaluation of wireless networks. In E-WIND '05: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Experimental approaches to wireless network design and analysis, pages 64--69, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. A virtual network infrastructure. http://www.vini-veritas.net.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. B. White, J. Lepreau, L. Stoller, R. Ricci, S. Guruprasad, M. Newbold, M. Hibler, C. Barb, and A. Joglekar. An integrated experimental environment for distributed systems and networks. In Proc. of the Fifth Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, pages 255--270, Boston, MA, Dec. 2002. USENIX Association. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. J. Zhou, Z. Ji, M. Varshney, Z. Xu, Y. Yang, M. Marina, and R. Bagrodia. Whynet: a hybrid testbed for large-scale, heterogeneous and adaptive wireless networks. In WiNTECH '06: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on Wireless network testbeds, experimental evaluation&characterization, pages 111--112, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The Stanford OpenRoads deployment

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WINTECH '09: Proceedings of the 4th ACM international workshop on Experimental evaluation and characterization
        September 2009
        110 pages
        ISBN:9781605587400
        DOI:10.1145/1614293

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 September 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate63of100submissions,63%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader