skip to main content
10.1145/1644038.1644049acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Canopy closure estimates with GreenOrbs: sustainable sensing in the forest

Published:04 November 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Motivated by the needs of precise forest inventory and real-time surveillance for ecosystem management, in this paper we present GreenOrbs [2], a wireless sensor network system and its application for canopy closure estimates. Both the hardware and software designs of GreenOrbs are tailored for sensing in wild environments without human supervision, including a firm weatherproof enclosure of sensor motes and a light-weight mechanism for node state monitoring and data collection. By incorporating a pre-deployment training process as well as a distributed calibration method, the estimates of canopy closure stay accurate and consistent against uncertain sensory data and dynamic environments. We have implemented a prototype system of GreenOrbs and carried out multiple rounds of deployments. The evaluation results demonstrate that GreenOrbs outperforms the conventional approaches for canopy closure estimates. Some early experiences are reported in this paper.

References

  1. FRA 2000 On Definitions of Forest and Forest Change. http://www.fao.org/docrep/006/ad665e/ad665e00.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. GreenOrbs. http://www.greenorbs.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Si photodiode S1087/S1133 Series.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. G. Barrenetxea and G. Schaefer. The hitchhiker's guide to successful wireless sensor network deployments. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Embedded network sensor systems, pages 43--56. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. F. Bunnell and D. Vales. Comparison of methods for estimating forest overstory cover: differences among techniques. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 20(1):101--107, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. A. Cescatti. Modelling the radiative transfer in discontinuous canopies of asymmetric crowns. II. Model testing and application in a Norway spruce stand. Ecological Modelling, 101(2--3):275--284, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. P. Dutta, J. Hui, J. Jeong, S. Kim, C. Sharp, J. Taneja, G. Tolle, K. Whitehouse, and D. Culler. Trio: Enabling sustainable and scalable outdoor wireless sensor network deployments. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks, pages 407--415. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Englund, J. O'Brien, and D. Clark. Evaluation of digital and film hemispherical photography and spherical densiometry for measuring forest light environments. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 30(12):1999--2005, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. A. Fiala, S. Garman, and A. Gray. Comparison of five canopy cover estimation techniques in the western Oregon Cascades. Forest Ecology and Management, 232(1--3):188--197, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. R. Grumbine. What is ecosystem management? Conservation Biology, 8(1):27--38, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. F. James. Monte Carlo theory and practice. Reports on Progress in Physics, 43(9):1145--1189, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J. Kang, Y. Zhang, and B. Nath. TARA: Topology-Aware Resource Adaptation to Alleviate Congestion in Sensor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 18(7):919, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. L. Korhonen, K. Korhonen, M. Rautiainen, and P. Stenberg. Estimation of forest canopy cover: a comparison of field measurement techniques. Silva Fennica, 40(4):577, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. M. Li and Y. Liu. Underground structure monitoring with wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks, pages 69--78. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. Mainwaring, J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, D. Culler, and J. Anderson. Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. D. Moore. The basic practice of statistics. WH Freeman, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, and D. Culler. Telos: Enabling ultra-low power wireless research. In Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on Information processing in sensor networks. IEEE Press Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. V. Ravelomanana. Optimal initialization and gossiping algorithms for random radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 18(1):17--28, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. L. Selavo, A. Wood, Q. Cao, T. Sookoor, H. Liu, A. Srinivasan, Y. Wu, W. Kang, J. Stankovic, D. Young, et al. LUSTER: wireless sensor network for environmental research. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, pages 103--116. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. G. Tolle, J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, D. Culler, N. Turner, K. Tu, S. Burgess, T. Dawson, P. Buonadonna, D. Gay, et al. A macroscope in the redwoods. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, pages 51--63. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. P. Vicaire, T. He, Q. Cao, T. Yan, G. Zhou, L. Gu, L. Luo, R. Stoleru, J. Stankovic, and T. Abdelzaher. Achieving long-term surveillance in vigilnet. In Proceedings of the 25th IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. G. Werner-Allen, K. Lorincz, J. Johnson, J. Lees, and M. Welsh. Fidelity and yield in a volcano monitoring sensor network. In Proceedings of OSDI, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. N. Xu, S. Rangwala, K. Chintalapudi, D. Ganesan, A. Broad, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin. A wireless sensor network for structural monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, pages 13--24. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. L. Zhang, H. Yu, H. Yang, and Z. Zhang. Theoretical Research on a Model for Predicting the Shadow Boundary of an Individual Conical Crown on a Slope. ACTA ECOLOGICA SINICA, 26(010):3317--3323, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Canopy closure estimates with GreenOrbs: sustainable sensing in the forest

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SenSys '09: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
          November 2009
          438 pages
          ISBN:9781605585192
          DOI:10.1145/1644038

          Copyright © 2009 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 4 November 2009

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate174of867submissions,20%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader