skip to main content
10.1145/1644893.1644928acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Where's that phone?: geolocating IP addresses on 3G networks

Published:04 November 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Cell phones connected to high-speed 3G networks constitute an increasingly important class of clients on the Internet. From the viewpoint of the servers they connect to, such devices are virtually indistinguishable from conventional end-hosts. In this study, we examine the IP addresses seen by Internet servers for cell phone clients and make two observations. First, individual cell phones can expose different IP addresses to servers within time spans of a few minutes, rendering IP-based user identification and blocking inadequate. Second, cell phone IP addresses do not embed geographical information at reasonable fidelity, reducing the effectiveness of commercial geolocation tools used by websites for fraud detection, server selection and content customization. In addition to these two observations, we show that application-level latencies between cell phones and Internet servers can differ greatly depending on the location of the cell phone, but do not vary much at a given location over short time spans; as a result, they provide fine-grained location information that IPs do not.

References

  1. http://www.ip2location.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. http://www.maxmind.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. http://www.quova.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. http://www.google.com/mobile/gmm/mylocation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. P. V. Bahl and V. N. Padmanabhan. RADAR: An in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. In INFOCOM 2000, Tel-Aviv, Israel.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. M. Casado and M. J. Freedman. Peering through the shroud: The effect of edge opacity on IP-based client identification. In NSDI 2007: Fourth Usenix Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. B. Hofmann-Wellenhof, H. Lichtenegger, and J. Collins. Global Positioning System: Theory and Practice. Springer-Verlag, 3rd edition, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Hopper, A. Harter, and T. Blackie. The active badge system. In Proc of the INTERCHI Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. V. N. Padmanabhan and L. Subramanian. An investigation of geographic mapping techniques for Internet hosts. In ACM SIGCOMM 2001, San Diego, CA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. N. B. Priyantha, A. Chakraborty, and H. Balakrishnan. The Cricket location-support system. In MobiCom 2000: ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, Boston, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Varshavsky, E. de Lara, A. LaMarca, J. Hightower, and V. Otsason. Gsm indoor localization. Pervasive and Mobile Computing Journal (PMC), 3(6):698--720, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. B. Wong, I. Stoyanov, and E. G. Sirer. Octant: A comprehensive framework for the geolocalization of Internet hosts. In NSDI 2007: Fourth Usenix Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Y. Xie, F. Yu, K. Achan, E. Gillum, M. Goldszmidt, and T. Wobber. How dynamic are ip addresses? In ACM SIGCOMM 2007, Kyoto, Japan. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Where's that phone?: geolocating IP addresses on 3G networks

      Recommendations

      Reviews

      Rogier Noldus

      This is an interesting paper on a relevant topic. The authors nicely present the problem, and then back it up with measurement results. The paper does not thoroughly explain why Internet protocol (IP) addresses for third-generation (3G) phones seem to be ephemeral and itinerant. It addresses neither the cause of this nor possible resolutions. First, the paper concludes that it is inaccurate to base the location of a phone on its IP address. Next, it delves into latency measurements and analysis, using latency to determine location. Unfortunately, the paper fails to theoretically explain why latency has a small variance over time, for a phone that remains in a particular location, and how this may be used to determine or estimate the location. Looking to the future, will such a mechanism also be accurate for evolved 3G networks, which differ in architecture from contemporary 3G networks__?__ There are many ongoing developments in radio networks, core networks, and applications that may result in changes in latency. Overall, the paper provides insight and interesting measurement results. It will definitely entice many readers to perform further research in this area. Online Computing Reviews Service

      Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

      Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        IMC '09: Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement
        November 2009
        468 pages
        ISBN:9781605587714
        DOI:10.1145/1644893

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 November 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate277of1,083submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

        IMC '24
        ACM Internet Measurement Conference
        November 4 - 6, 2024
        Madrid , AA , Spain

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader