skip to main content
10.1145/169059.169268acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

One is not enough: multiple views in a media space

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 May 1993Publication History

ABSTRACT

Media spaces support collaboration, but the limited access they provide to remote colleagues' activities can undermine their utility. To address this limitation, we built an experimental system in which four switchable cameras were deployed in each of two remote offices, and observed participants using the system to collaborate on two tasks. The new views allowed increased access to task-related artifacts; indeed, users preferred these views to more typical “face-to-face” ones. However, problems of establishing a joint frame of reference were exacerbated by the additional complexity, leading us to speculate about more effective ways to expand access to remote sites.

References

  1. 1.Argyle, M. and Cook, M. Gaze and mutual gaze. London: Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Bly, S., and Minneman, S. Commune: A shared drawing surface. Proceedings of C01S'90, ACM, New York, 1990, pp. 184 - 192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Dourish, P., and Bellotti, V. Awareness and coordination in shared work spaces. Proceedings of CSCW'92 (Toronto, 1 -4 November, 1992). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Fish, R., Kraut, R., Root, R., and Rice, R. Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication. Proceechngs of CHI'92 (Monterey, 3 - 7 May, 1992). ACM, New York, pp. 37 -48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Gaver, W. The affordances of media spaces for collaboration. Proceedings of CSCW'92 (Toronto, 1 - 4 November, 1992). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Gaver, W., Moran, T., MacLean, A., LOvstrand, L., Dourish, P., Carter, K., and Buxton, W. Realizing a video environment: EuroPARC's RAVE system. Proceedings of CHr92 (Monterey, California, 3 - 7 May, 1992). ACM, New York, pp. 27 - 35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Gibson, J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, New York, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Harrison, S., Minneman, S., and Irwin, S. Graspable implication: A study of 3-D objects in remote collaboration. Xerox PARC technical report, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Heath, C., and Luff, P. Media space and communicative asymmetries: Preliminary observations of video mediated interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 7 (1992), pp. 99 - 103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Ishii, H., and Kobayashi, M. ClearBoard: A seamless medium for shared drawing and conversation with eye contact. Proceedings of CHI'92 (Monterey, California, 3 - 7 May, 1992). ACM, New York, pp. 525 - 540. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Luff, P., Heath, C., and Greatbatch, D. Tasks-ininteraction: Paper and screen baseM documentation in collaborative activity. Proceedings of CSCW'92 (Toronto, 1 -4 November, 1992). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.Mantei, M., Baecker, R., Sellen, A., Buxton, W., Milligan, T., and Wellman, B. Experiences in the use of a media space. Proceedings of CHI'91 (New Orleans, April 28 - May 2, 1991) ACM, New York, pp. 203 - 208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.McGrath, J. Groups: Interaction and performance, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Sellen, A. Speech patterns in video-mediated conversations. Proceedings of CHI'92 (Monterey, California, 3 - 7 May, 1992). ACM, New York, pp. 49 - 59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.Sellen, A. Statistical measures of speech in technology-mediateM conversations. Technical Report No. EPC-92-125, Rank Xerox EuroPARC, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.Short, J., Williams, E., and Christie, B. The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley & Sons, 1976,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.Smets, G. Designing for telepresence: The interdependence of movement and visual perception implemented. Proceedings of the IFAC Man-Machine Symposium, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. 18.Stults, R. Media space. Xerox PARC technical report, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.Weber, K., and Minneman, S. The Office Design Project. SIGCHI Video Review, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. One is not enough: multiple views in a media space

                      Recommendations

                      Comments

                      Login options

                      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                      Sign in
                      • Published in

                        cover image ACM Conferences
                        CHI '93: Proceedings of the INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
                        May 1993
                        547 pages
                        ISBN:0897915755
                        DOI:10.1145/169059
                        • Chairmen:
                        • Bert Arnold,
                        • Gerrit van der Veer,
                        • Ted White

                        Copyright © 1993 ACM

                        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                        Publisher

                        Association for Computing Machinery

                        New York, NY, United States

                        Publication History

                        • Published: 1 May 1993

                        Permissions

                        Request permissions about this article.

                        Request Permissions

                        Check for updates

                        Qualifiers

                        • Article

                        Acceptance Rates

                        CHI '93 Paper Acceptance Rate62of330submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

                      PDF Format

                      View or Download as a PDF file.

                      PDF

                      eReader

                      View online with eReader.

                      eReader