skip to main content
10.1145/1718918.1718946acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Making love in the network closet: the benefits and work of family videochat

Published:06 February 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we explore the benefits of videochat for families and the corresponding work that home users engage in to make a video call run smoothly. We explore the varieties of social work required, including coordination work, presentation work, behavioral work, and scaffolding work, as well as the technical work necessary. We outline the benefits families enjoy for doing this work and discuss the ways in which families use videochat to reinforce their identity as a family and reinforce their family values, in effect making - as in creating - love. We conclude with recommendations for improving videochat and for designing with family values in mind more generally.

References

  1. Bly, S.A., Harrison, S.R., and Irwin, S. Media spaces: bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment. CACM 36, 1 (1993), 28--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Brown, B., Taylor, A., Izadi, S., Sellen, A., Kaye, J., and Eardley, R. Locating Family Values: A Field Trial of the Whereabouts Clock. In UbiComp 2007: Ubiquitous Computing. 2007, 354--371. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bruner, J. Child's Talk: Learning to Use Language. W.W. Norton & Co., 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brush, A.B., Inkpen, K.M., and Tee, K. SPARCS: exploring sharing suggestions to enhance family connectedness. Proc. CSCW'08, ACM (2008), 629--638. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cockton, G. Designing worth is worth designing. Proc. NordiCHI'06, ACM (2006), 165--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cowan, R.S. More Work For Mother: The Ironies Of Household Technology From The Open Hearth To The Microwave. Basic Books, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dantec, C.A.L., Poole, E.S., and Wyche, S.P. Values as lived experience: evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery. Proc. CHI'09, ACM (2009), 1141--1150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dourish, P. and Bly, S. Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group. Proc. CHI'92, ACM (1992), 541--547. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dourish, P., Grinter, E., Flor, J.D.D.L., and Joseph, M. Security in the wild: user strategies for managing security as an everyday, practical problem. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 8, 6 (2004), 391--401. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Fish, R.S., Kraut, R.E., and Chalfonte, B.L. The VideoWindow system in informal communication. Proc. CHI'90, ACM (1990), 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Friedman, B., Peter H. Khan, J., and Howe, D.C. Trust online. Commun. ACM 43, 12 (2000), 34--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gaver, W., Moran, T., MacLean, A., et al. Realizing a video environment: EuroPARC's RAVE system. Proc. CHI'92, ACM (1992), 27--35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gilmore, D.J., Cockton, G., Churchill, E., Kujala, S., Henderson, A., and Hammontree, M. Values, value and worth: their relationship to hci? CHI '08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2008), 3933--3936. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gregg, J.L. Tearing down walls for the homebound elderly. Ext. Abs. CHI'01, ACM (2001), 469--470. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Grinter, R.E., Edwards, W.K., Newman, M.W., and Ducheneaut, N. The work to make a home network work. Proc. ECSCW'05, (2005), 469--488. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Gueddana, S. and Roussel, N. Pêle-Mêle, a video communication system supporting a variable degree of engagement. Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM (2006), 423--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Harmon, A. Grandma's on the Computer Screen. New York Times, 2008. nytimes.com/2008/11/27/us/27minicam.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., et al. Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. Proc. CHI'03, ACM (2003), 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., et al. Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media. The MIT Press, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kaye, J. 'J.', Go, J., Ames, M., and Spasojevic, M. The Joys and Frustrations of Family Videoconferencing. Under consideration for Proc. CHI 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller, D. A Theory of Shopping. Cornell University Press, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Millett, L.I., Friedman, B., and Felten, E. Cookies and Web browser design: toward realizing informed consent online. Proc. CHI'01, ACM (2001), 46--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Nguyen, D. and Canny, J. MultiView: spatially faithful group video conferencing. Proc. CHI'05, ACM (2005), 799--808. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. O'Hara, K., Black, A., and Lipson, M. Everyday practices with mobile video telephony. Proc. CHI'06, ACM (2006), 871--880. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Palen, L. and Dourish, P. Unpacking "privacy" for a networked world. Proc. CHI'03, ACM (2003), 129--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Plaisant, C., Clamage, A., Hutchinson, H.B., Bederson, B.B., and Druin, A. Shared family calendars: Promoting symmetry and accessibility. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 13, 3 (2006), 313--346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Rode, J.A., Toye, E.F., and Blackwell, A.F. The domestic economy: a broader unit of analysis for end user programming. Ext. Abs. CHI'05, ACM (2005), 1757--1760. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Shehan, E. and Edwards, W.K. Home networking and HCI: what hath god wrought? Proc. CHI'07, ACM (2007), 547--556. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Tolmie, P., Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., Greenhalgh, C., and Benford, S. Making the home network at home: Digital housekeeping. In ECSCW 2007. 2007, 331--350.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Yarosh, S. Supporting long-distance parent-child interaction in divorced families. Ext. Abs. CHI'08, ACM (2008), 3795--3800. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Making love in the network closet: the benefits and work of family videochat

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
      February 2010
      468 pages
      ISBN:9781605587950
      DOI:10.1145/1718918

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 February 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader