Asela Gunawardana
ABSTRACT
Soft keyboards offer touch-capable mobile and tabletop devices many advantages such as multiple language support and room for larger displays. On the other hand, because soft keyboards lack haptic feedback, users often produce more typing errors. In order to make soft keyboards more robust to noisy input, researchers have developed key-target resizing algorithms, where underlying target areas for keys are dynamically resized based on their probabilities. In this paper, we describe how overly aggressive key-target resizing can sometimes prevent users from typing their desired text, violating basic user expectations about keyboard functionality. We propose an anchored key-target method which incorporates usability principles so that soft keyboards can remain robust to errors while respecting usability principles. In an empirical evaluation, we found that using anchored dynamic key-targets significantly reduce keystroke errors as compared to the state-of-the-art.
- Apple iPhone, 2009. http://www.apple.com/iphone/.Google Scholar
- Microsoft Surface, 2009. http://www.microsoft.com/surface/.Google Scholar
- K. Al Faraj, M. Mojahid, and N. Vigouroux. Bigkey: A virtual keyboard for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Part III, pages 3--10, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Brewster, F. Chohan, and L. Brown. Tactile feedback for mobile interactions. In CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 159--162, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Goodman. A bit of progress in language modeling. Computer Speech & Language, 15(4):403--434, 2001.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Goodman, G. Venolia, J. Steury, and C. Parker. Language modeling for soft keyboards. In AAAI, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Himberg, J. Hakkila, P. Kangas, and J. Mantyjarvi. On-line personalization of a touch screen based keyboard. In IUI, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Hoggan, S. A. Brewster, and J. Johnston. Investigating the effectiveness of tactile feedback for mobile touchscreens. In CHI '08: Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1573--1582, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. Jelinek. Statistical Methods for Speech Recognition. MIT Press, 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Klsch and M. Turk. Keyboards without keyboards: A survey of virtual keyboards. Technical report, In: Proceedings of Sensing and Input for Media-centric Systems, 2002.Google Scholar
- I. S. MacKenzie and R. W. Soukoreff. Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques. In CHI '03: CHI '03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 754--755, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- I. S. MacKenzie and K. Tanaka-Ishii. Text entry systems: Mobility, accessibility, universality. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- I. S. MacKenzie and S. X. Zhang. The design and evaluation of a high-performance soft keyboard. In CHI'99: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 25--31. ACM, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- I. S. MacKenzie and X. Zhang. Eye typing using word and letter prediction and a fixation algorithm. In ETRA'08: Proceedings of the 2008 symposium on Eye tracking research and applications, pages 55--58, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Magnien, J. Bouraoui, and N. Vigouroux. Mobile text input with soft keyboards: optimization by means of visual clues. In Proceedings of Mobile HCI, pages 337--341, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- D. Pogue. iPhone keyboard secrets. The New York Times, June 2007.Google Scholar
- E. Rabin and A. M. Gordon. Tactile feedback contributes to consistency of finger movements during typing. Experimental Brain Research, 155:362--369, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. E. Shannon. Prediction and entropy of printed English. Bell Sys. Tech. J., 30, 1951.Google Scholar
- S. Zhai, M. Hunter, and B. A. Smith. The metropolis keyboard - an exploration of quantitative techniques for virtual keyboard design. In UIST '00: Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pages 119--128, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Usability guided key-target resizing for soft keyboards
Recommendations
Touch behavior with different postures on soft smartphone keyboards
MobileHCI '12: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and servicesText entry on smartphones is far slower and more error-prone than on traditional desktop keyboards, despite sophisticated detection and auto-correct algorithms. To strengthen the empirical and modeling foundation of smartphone text input improvements, ...
Language modeling for soft keyboards
IUI '02: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Intelligent user interfacesLanguage models predict the probability of letter sequences. Soft keyboards are images of keyboards on a touch screen for input on Personal Digital Assistants. When a soft keyboard user hits a key near the boundary of a key position, the language model ...
Text Entry on Tiny QWERTY Soft Keyboards
CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe advent of wearables (e.g., smartwatches, smartglasses, and digital jewelry) anticipates the need for text entry methods on very small devices. We conduct fundamental research on this topic using 3 qwerty-based soft keyboards for 3 different screen ...
Comments