Grace YoungJoo Jeon
ABSTRACT
Online question-answering services provide mechanisms for knowledge exchange by allowing users to ask and answer questions on a wide range of topics. A key question for designing such services is whether charging a price has an effect on answer quality. Two field experiments using one such service, Google Answers, offer conflicting answers to this question. To resolve this inconsistency, we re-analyze data from Harper et al. [5] and Chen et al. [2] to study the price effect in greater depth. Decomposing the price effect into two different levels yields results that reconcile those of the two field experiments. Specifically, we find that: (1) a higher price significantly increases the likelihood that a question receives an answer and (2) for questions that receive an answer, there is no significant price effect on answer quality. Additionally, we find that the rater background makes a difference in evaluating answer quality.
- Adamic, L. A., Zhang, J., Bakshy, E. and Ackerman, M. S. Knowledge Sharing and Yahoo Answers: Everyone Knows Something. In Proc. WWW 2008, 2008. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Chen, Y., Ho, T. and Kim, Y. Knowledge Market Design: A Field Experiment on Google Answers. Journal of Public Economic Theory, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- Edelman, B. Earnings and Ratings at Google Answers. Manuscript, 2004.Google Scholar
- Gazan, R. Specialists and Synthesists in a Question Answering Community. In Proc. American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Harper, F. M., Raban, D., Rafaeli, S. and Konstan, J. A. Predictors of Answer Quality in Online Q&A Sites. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Heckman, J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153--162, 1979.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mason, W., Watts, D. J. Financial Incentives and the "Performance of Crowds". In Proc. KDD-HCOMP '09, ACM Press, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nam, K. K., Ackerman, M. S. and Adamic, L. A. Questions in, Knowledge iN? A Study of Naver's Question Answering Community. In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM Press, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Raban, D., The Incentive Structure in an Online Information Market. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(14), 2284--2295, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rafaeli, S., Raban, D. and Ravid, G. How Social Motivation Enhances Economic Activity and Incentives in the Google Answers Knowledge Sharing Market, International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 2007Google ScholarCross Ref
- Regner, T. Why Voluntary Contributions? Google Answers! Technical Report, University of Jena, 2009.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Re-examining price as a predictor of answer quality in an online q&a site
Recommendations
Predictors of answer quality in online Q&A sites
CHI '08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsQuestion and answer (Q&A) sites such as Yahoo! Answers are places where users ask questions and others answer them. In this paper, we investigate predictors of answer quality through a comparative, controlled field study of responses provided across ...
Answer Quality Characteristics and Prediction on an Academic Q&A Site: A Case Study on ResearchGate
WWW '15 Companion: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide WebDespite various studies on examining and predicting answer quality on generic social Q&A sites such as Yahoo! Answers, little is known about why answers on academic Q&A sites are voted on by scholars who follow the discussion threads to be high quality ...
How many answers are enough? optimal number of answers for Q&A sites
SocInfo'12: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Social InformaticsWith the proliferation of the social web questions about information quality and optimization attract the attention of IS scholars. Question-answering (QA) sites, such as Yahoo!Answers, have the potential to produce good answers, but at the same time ...
Comments