skip to main content
10.1145/1753846.1754099acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Competitive carbon counting: can social networking sites make saving energy more enjoyable?

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper reports on the design, deployment and initial evaluation of "Wattsup", an innovative Facebook application which displays live data from a commercial off-the-shelf energy monitor. The Wattsup application was deployed and trialled in eight homes over an eighteen day period in two conditions - personal energy data viewable and friend's energy data viewable. A significant reduction in energy was observed in the socially enabled condition. The paper argues that socially-mediated discussion and competition made for a more enjoyable user experience.

References

  1. Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., Rothengatter, T. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. In Journal of Environmental Psychology 2005, 25 273--291.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Blevis E. Sustainable Interaction Design: Invention and Disposal, Renewal and Reuse. In Proc. CHI 2007, 502--512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cairns, P., and Cox, A.L Research Methods for Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chetty, M., Tran, D., Grinter, R.E. Getting to green: understanding resource consumption in the home. In Proc. UbiComp 2008, vol. 344. 242--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Consolvo, S., Everitt, K., Smith, I., and Landay, J. A. Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity. In Proc CHI 2006, 457--466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Darby, S. The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption: A review for DEFRA of the literature on metering, billing and direct displays, Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Defra, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: Autumn Performance Report 2006. http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/apr/apr2006.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Facebook, Facebook | Statistics http://www.Facebook.com/press/info.php?statisticsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Fischer, C. Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency 1, 1 (2008), 79--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Fogg, B.J. Three possible futures for persuasive technology. In Proc. Persuasive 2009, vol 350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Fogg, B.J. Persuasive Technology -- Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Francis, P. The impact of UK households on the environment through direct and indirect generation of greenhouse gases. Office for National Statistics, London, UK 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ham, J., Midden, C., and Beute, F. Can ambient persuasive technology persuade unconsciously?: using subliminal feedback to influence energy consumption ratings of household appliances. In Proc. Persuasive 2009, vol. 350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. IPCC, IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Working Group I Report "The Physical Science Basis" http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-syr.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Joinson, A. N. 'Looking at', 'looking up' or 'keeping up' with people? motives and use of Facebook. In Proc. CHI 2008,1027--1036. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kinver, M. Saving Energy on the Home Front (BBC News -- 23/10/06) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6056398.stmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mankoff, J., Blevis, E., Borning, A., Friedman, B., Fussell, S., Hasbrouck, J., Woodruff , A., and Sengers, P. Environmental Sustainability and Interaction. In Proc. CHI 2007, 2121--2124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. National Statistics, National Statistics Online http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=1710Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Schultz, P.W., Nolan, J.M., Cialdini, R.B., Goldsteing, N.J., and Griskevicius, V. The Constructive, Destructive and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms. Psychological Science, 18, 5 (2007), 429--434.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Walker G., and King D. The Hot Topic: How to Tackle Global Warming and Still Keep the Lights on. Bloomsbury, London, 2008Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Competitive carbon counting: can social networking sites make saving energy more enjoyable?

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI EA '10: CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2010
        2219 pages
        ISBN:9781605589305
        DOI:10.1145/1753846

        Copyright © 2010 Copyright is held by the author/owner(s)

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 April 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • extended-abstract

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI EA '10 Paper Acceptance Rate350of1,346submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate5,779of22,566submissions,26%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader