skip to main content
article
Free Access

Experience with a learning personal assistant

Published:01 July 1994Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1 Bareiss, R., Porter, B., and Vv'eir, C. PROTOS: An exempk~r~based learn~ mg apprentice. Tech. R.ep. A187-53, Univ. of ~!~xas at: Austin, Austin, Texas, 1988, Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2 Bocionek, S. and Sassin, M. Dialogbased learning (DBL) fbr adaptive mterrace agents and programming-bydemonstration systems. I~ch. Rep. CMU.-CS-93-.I75, Carnegie Mellon. Univ., Pittsburgh, Pa., 19{t3, Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3 Caruana, R. and Freitag, D. Greedy attribute selection. In Proceedings o/'lhe Eh,venth. International Co~gerence on Mach:ine Learning.july i994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 Dent, L,, Boticario, J., McDermott, j., Mitchell, T., and Zabowski, D. A per. sonal, learmng apprentice. In Proceedings of the International.Joint Co~{fi, rence o-n. Art{ficiat Intelligence. 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 Foltz, P.W. and Dumais, T. Personab ized infbrmation delivery: .,M~ analysis of inibrmation filtering methods. Commun. A CM _35, I2 (1990), 51-60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6 Iloite, R, and Drummond, C. A learning apprentice. "I~ch. Rep~ Univ. of Ottawa, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 Jouxdan, J., l)ent, I ... McI)ermott, j., Mitchell. T.,,. and Zabowski, D. InteJ:- faces that |earn: A learning apprentice fbr calendar management, Tech. Rep. (;MU-CS-91-135, Carnegie Mellon Univ,, Pittsburgh, Pa,, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 Kay, A. Compt~ter software. Sci. Am. 25!, 3 (I 984), 53-59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 Kodratofl, Y. and Teucci, (.;~ I.)ISCt- PLE: An iterative approach to learning appren:tice systems. Tech, Rep. UPS-293, Laboramire de Recherche enlnfi)rmatique, U:niversite de PARIS-SUD, Paris, France, 1.986,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 Kozierok, R, and Mac:s, P,. Intelligent groupware fbr scheduling meetings. Submitted to (.;SCW-92, 1992:.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11 Mitchell, T.M,, Mahadevan, S., and Steinberg, L, I.EAP: A Iearnmg apprentice for VLSI design. I:~ Proceedi:ngs .0/ the Ni:nth International Joint Con- .ference on. Art{'{i:cial Intelligence, 1985.:Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 Nakauchi, Y., Okada, T. and Anzai, Y. Groupware that learns, tn t-roceedi:ug~ (~}~the IEEE Pa.ctj}Tc Rim Communicario.us, Compute,:s and Sigmd Processi~g C.0.~!.fi, rence. IEEE, New York, 19~1iGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13 Negroponte, N. The Architecture Machine: Towards a More Human Environmerit. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14 Quin.lan, .J.R. Generating .prodt~ction rules from decision trees. 1n Proceedings ~{"the hUernational Joint Conference on. A rt{fic.ial intelligen.ce. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15 Quinlan, J.R. Induction of decision trees. Math. Learn. I, I (.I.986), 8.1- t06. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16 RumeIhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E. and Williams. R.j. Learning internal representations by error pr.opagation. In Parallel Distributed Procesaing. M IT Press. Cambridge, Mass., 1986, p.p~ 318- 362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17 Russell, S. ,amatogicat and inductive reasoning. Ph.D. thesis, Computer Science Dept., 1986, Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18 Sadeh N. l.ook-ahead techniques i0r micro-opportunistic job .shop scheduling. Ph.D. thesis, Robotics I.nst., Carnegie Mellon Univ.,. Pi.ttsburg|.~., Pa. ! 99!. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19 Salton, G, and Buckley, C. Improving retrieval peribrmance by relevance feedback. JASIS 41 (11990), 288-297.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. 20 Schlimmer, J.C. Redstone: A learning apprentice of text tran.sformations for cataloging.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21 Sheth, B. and Maes, P. Evolving agents !br personalized information filtering, In Proceedings o{ the Ninth 1EEE Co~:(/'erence 0'n, Allot Application.s. IEEE, New York, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Experience with a learning personal assistant

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Communications of the ACM
      Communications of the ACM  Volume 37, Issue 7
      July 1994
      135 pages
      ISSN:0001-0782
      EISSN:1557-7317
      DOI:10.1145/176789
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 1994 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 July 1994

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader