skip to main content
10.1145/1835804.1835813acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multiple kernel learning for heterogeneous anomaly detection: algorithm and aviation safety case study

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 July 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

The world-wide aviation system is one of the most complex dynamical systems ever developed and is generating data at an extremely rapid rate. Most modern commercial aircraft record several hundred flight parameters including information from the guidance, navigation, and control systems, the avionics and propulsion systems, and the pilot inputs into the aircraft. These parameters may be continuous measurements or binary or categorical measurements recorded in one second intervals for the duration of the flight. Currently, most approaches to aviation safety are reactive, meaning that they are designed to react to an aviation safety incident or accident. In this paper, we discuss a novel approach based on the theory of multiple kernel learning to detect potential safety anomalies in very large data bases of discrete and continuous data from world-wide operations of commercial fleets. We pose a general anomaly detection problem which includes both discrete and continuous data streams, where we assume that the discrete streams have a causal influence on the continuous streams. We also assume that atypical sequences of events in the discrete streams can lead to off-nominal system performance. We discuss the application domain, novel algorithms, and also discuss results on real-world data sets. Our algorithm uncovers operationally significant events in high dimensional data streams in the aviation industry which are not detectable using state of the art methods.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

kdd2010_das_mklh_01.mov

mov

85.4 MB

References

  1. I. C. Statler, "The Aviation System Monitoring and Modeling (ASMM) Project: A Documentation of its History and Accomplishments: 1999--2005". 2007,Technical Report: NASA/TP-2007-214556.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. F. R. Bach, G. R. G. Lanckriet and M. I. Jordan, "Multiple kernel learning, conic duality, and the SMO algorithm". 2004,International Conference on Machine Learning. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. D. Bay and M. Schwabacher, "Mining Distance-Based Outliers in Near Linear Time with Randomization and a Simple Pruning Rule". 2003,Proceedings of The Ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. National Transportation Safety Board, "Loss of Control and Impact with Pacific Ocean Alaska Airlines Flight 261", 2002,ulr: http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/2002/AAR0201.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Budalakoti and A. N. Srivastava and M. E. Otey, "Anomaly Detection and Diagnosis Algorithms for Discrete Symbol Sequences with Applications to Airline Safety", 2008,Vol. 39, No. 1, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, pages 101--113. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. J. C. Burges, "A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition", 1998,Vol. 2, DMKD, pages 121--167. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. V. Chandola, A. Banerjee and V. Kumar, "Anomaly Detection: A Survey", 2009,ACM Computing Surveys. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. O. Chapelle and P. Haffner, "Support Vector Machines for Histogram-Based Classification", 1999,Vol. 10, No. 5, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, pages 1055--1064. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Das, B. L. Matthews, K. Bhaduri, N. C. Oza and A. N. Srivastava, "Detecting Anomalies in Multivariate Data Sets with Switching Sequences and Continuous Streams", 2009,NIPS 2009 Workshop: Understanding Multiple Kernel Learning Methods.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Z. Harchaoui and F. R. Bach, "Image classification with Segmentation Graph Kernels", 2007,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. W. Hunt and T. G. Szymanski, "A Fast Algorithm for Computing Longest Common Subsequences", 1977,Vol. 20, No. 5, Communications of the ACM, pages 350--353. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. D. L. Iverson, R. Martin, M. Schwabacher, L. Spirkovska, W. Taylor, R. Mackey, and J. P. Castle "General Purpose Data-Driven System Monitoring for Space Operations", 2009, Proceedings of the AIAA Infotech@Aerospace Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. H. Kashima, K. Tsuda and A. Inokuchi, "Kernels for Graphs", 2004, Vol. 39, No. 1, Kernel Methods in Computational Biology, pages 101--113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. G. R. G. Lanckriet, N. Cristianini, L. El Ghaoui, P. Bartlett and M. I. Jordan, "Learning the Kernel Matrix with Semidefinite Programming", 2004, Vol. 5, Journal of Machine Learning Research, pages 27--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. P. Patel and E. Keogh and J. Lin and S. Lonardi, "Mining Motifs in Massive Time Series Databases", 2002,International Conference on Data Mining. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. B. Scholkopf, J. C. Platt, J. Shawe-taylor, A. J. Smola and R. C. Williamson, "Estimating the Support of a High-Dimensional Distribution". 2001, Vol. 13, No. 7, Neural Computation, issn 0899--7667,MIT Press,Cambridge, MA, USA, pages 1443--1471. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. B. Scholkopf and A. Smola, "Learning with Kernels", 2002,MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. D. M. J. Tax and R. P. W. Duin, "Support Vector Domain Description", 1999,Vol. 20, Pattern Recognition Letters, pages 1191--1199. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Aviation Safety Team, "Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Accidents", 2007, Boeing Commercial Airplanes.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. H. Zhang, A. C. Berg, M. Maire and J. Malik, "SVM-KNN: Discriminative Nearest Neighbor Classification for Visual Category Recognition", 2006, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2126--2136.. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Multiple kernel learning for heterogeneous anomaly detection: algorithm and aviation safety case study

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                KDD '10: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
                July 2010
                1240 pages
                ISBN:9781450300551
                DOI:10.1145/1835804

                Copyright © 2010 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 25 July 2010

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

                Upcoming Conference

                KDD '24

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader