skip to main content
10.1145/1835804.1835923acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The community-search problem and how to plan a successful cocktail party

Published:25 July 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

A lot of research in graph mining has been devoted in the discovery of communities. Most of the work has focused in the scenario where communities need to be discovered with only reference to the input graph. However, for many interesting applications one is interested in finding the community formed by a given set of nodes. In this paper we study a query-dependent variant of the community-detection problem, which we call the community-search problem: given a graph G, and a set of query nodes in the graph, we seek to find a subgraph of G that contains the query nodes and it is densely connected.

We motivate a measure of density based on minimum degree and distance constraints, and we develop an optimum greedy algorithm for this measure. We proceed by characterizing a class of monotone constraints and we generalize our algorithm to compute optimum solutions satisfying any set of monotone constraints. Finally we modify the greedy algorithm and we present two heuristic algorithms that find communities of size no greater than a specified upper bound. Our experimental evaluation on real datasets demonstrates the efficiency of the proposed algorithms and the quality of the solutions we obtain.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

kdd2010_sozio_csp_01.mov

mov

150.1 MB

References

  1. G. Agarwal and D. Kempe. Modularity-maximizing network communities via mathematical programming. European Physics Journal B, 66(3), 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. R. Andersen and K. Chellapilla. Finding dense subgraphs with size bounds. In WAW, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. Andersen, F. Chung, and K. Lang. Local graph partitioning using pagerank vectors. In FOCS, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Y. Asahiro, K. Iwama, H. Tamaki, and T. Tokuyama. Greedily finding a dense subgraph. In SWAT, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. Asur and S. Parthasarathy. A viewpoint-based approach for interaction graph analysis. In KDD, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. U. Brandes, D. Delling, M. Gaertler, R. G¨orke, M. Hoefer, Z. Nikoloski, and D. Wagner. On modularity clustering. TKDE, 20(2):172--188, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Charikar. Greedy approximation algorithms for finding dense components in a graph. In APPROX, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Cheng, Y. Ke,W. Ng, and J. X. Yu. Context-aware object connection discovery in large graphs. In ICDE, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Y. Dourisboure, F. Geraci, and M. Pellegrini. Extraction and classification of dense communities in the web. In WWW, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. C. Faloutsos, K. McCurley, and A. Tomkins. Fast discovery of connection subgraphs. In KDD, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. U. Feige, G. Kortsarz, and D. Peleg. The dense k-subgraph problem. Algorithmica, 29:2001, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. G. W. Flake, S. Lawrence, and C. L. Giles. Efficient identification of web communities. In KDD, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. G. W. Flake, S. Lawrence, C. L. Giles, and F. M. Coetzee. Self-organization and identification of web communities. Computer, 35(3):66--71, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. Fortunato and M. Barthelemy. Resolution limit in community detection. PNAS, 104(1), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. D. Gibson, R. Kumar, and A. Tomkins. Discovering large dense subgraphs in massive graphs. In VLDB, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. Girvan and M. E. J. Newman. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 99(12):7821--7826, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. J. Hastad. Clique is hard to approximate within n1--µ. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC), 4(38), 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. G. Karypis and V. Kumar. A fast and high quality multilevel scheme for partitioning irregular graphs. JSC, 20(1), 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. G. Kasneci, S. Elbassuoni, and G. Weikum. Ming: mining informative entity relationship subgraphs. In CIKM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. Khuller and B. Saha. On finding dense subgraphs. In ICALP, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Y. Koren, S. C. North, and C. Volinsky. Measuring and extracting proximity graphs in networks. TKDD, 1(3), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. B. Korte and J. Vygen. Combinatorial Optimization: Theory and Algorithms (Algorithms and Combinatorics). Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. L. Kou, G. Markowsky, and L. Berman. A fast algorithm for steiner trees. Acta Informatica, 15(2):141--145, 1981Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. T. Lappas, K. Liu, and E. Terzi. Finding a team of experts in social networks. In KDD, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. J. Leskovec, K. J. Lang, A. Dasgupta, and M. W. Mahoney. Statistical properties of community structure in large social and information networks. In WWW, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. M. Newman. Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. P. Sevon, L. Eronen, P. Hintsanen, K. Kulovesi, and H. Toivonen. Link discovery in graphs derived from biological databases. In DILS, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. H. Tong and C. Faloutsos. Center-piece subgraphs: problem definition and fast solutions. In KDD, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. S. White and P. Smyth. A spectral clustering approach to finding communities in graph. In SDM, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The community-search problem and how to plan a successful cocktail party

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        KDD '10: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
        July 2010
        1240 pages
        ISBN:9781450300551
        DOI:10.1145/1835804

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 July 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

        Upcoming Conference

        KDD '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader