skip to main content
10.1145/1837274.1837498acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design and analysis of compact ultra energy-efficient logic gates using laterally-actuated double-electrode NEMS

Published:13 June 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Nano-Electro-Mechanical Switches (NEMS) are among the most promising emerging devices due to their near-zero subthreshold-leakage currents. This paper reports device fabrication and modeling, as well as novel logic gate design using "laterally-actuated double-electrode NEMS" structures. The new device structure has several advantages over existing NEMS architectures such as being immune to impact bouncing and release vibrations (unlike a vertically-actuated NEMS) and offer higher flexibility to implement compact logic gates (unlike a single-electrode NEMS). A comprehensive analytical framework is developed to model different properties of these devices by solving the Euler-Bernoulli's beam equation. The proposed model is validated using measurement data for the fabricated devices. It is shown that by ignoring the non-uniformity of the electrostatic force distribution, the existing models "underestimate" the actual value of Vpull-in and Vpull-out. Furthermore, novel energy efficient NEMS-based circuit topologies are introduced to implement compact inverter, NAND, NOR and XOR gates. For instance, the proposed XOR gate can be implemented by using only two NEMS devices compared to that of a static CMOS-based XOR gate that requires at least 10 transistors.

References

  1. G. E. Moore, "Cramming more components onto integrated circuits," Electronics, vol. 38, pp. 114--117, 1965.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Y. Taur and T. Ning, Fundamentals of Modern VLSI Devices, Cambridge University Press, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. N. Abele et al., "Suspended-gate MOSFET: bringing new MEMS functionality into solid-state MOS transistor," IEDM, 2005, pp. 479--481.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. H. F. Dadgour and K. Banerjee, "Design and Analysis of Hybrid NEMS-CMOS Circuits for Ultra Low-Power Applications," DAC, 2007, pp. 306--311. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. Chong, et al., "Nanoelectromechanical (NEM) Relay Integrated with CMOS SRAM for Improved Stability and Low Leakage," ICCAD, 2009, pp. 478--484. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. H. F. Dadgour and K. Banerjee, "Hybrid NEMS-CMOS integrated circuits: a novel strategy for energy-efficient designs," IET Computers and Digital Techniques, Special Issue on Advances in Nanoelectronics Circuits and Systems, vol. 3, pp. 593--608, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. K. L. Ekinci and M. L. Roukes, "Nanoelectromechanical systems," Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 76, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. E. Jang et al., "Nanoelectromechanical switches with vertically aligned carbon nanotubes," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 87, 163114, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. N. Abele et al., "Ultra-Low Voltage MEMS Resonator Based on RSG-MOSFET," 19th IEEE International Conference on MEMS, 2006, pp. 882--885.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. F. Gong, Z. Y. Xiao and P. Chan, "Integration of an RF MEMS resonator with a bulk CMOS process using a low-temperature and dry-release fabrication method," Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, vol. 17, pp. 20--25, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. H. Kam et al., "A new nano-electro-mechanical field effect transistor (NEMFET) design for low-power electronics," IEDM, 2005, pp. 463--466.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. K. Akarvardar et al., "Design Considerations for Complementary Nanoelectromechanical Logic Gates," IEDM, 2007, pp. 299--302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. K. Akarvardar et al., "Energy-reversible complementary NEM logic gates," Device Research Conference, 2008, pp. 69--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S. Bhunia, M. Tabib-Azar and D. Saab, "Ultralow-Power Reconfigurable Computing with Complementary Nano-Electromechanical Carbon Nanotube Switches," ASP-DAC, 2007, pp. 86--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Li, H. X. Tang and M. L. Roukes, "Ultra-sensitive NEMS-based cantilevers for sensing, scanned probe and very high-frequency applications," Nature Nanotech., vol. 2, pp. 114--120, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. W. W. Jang et al., "Fabrication and characterization of a nanoelectromechanical switch with 15-nm-thick suspension air gap", Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 92, 103110, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. L. Duraffourg, et. al., "Compact and explicit physical model for lateral metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor with nanoelectromechanical system based resonant gate," Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 92, 174106, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. H. A. C. Tilmans and R. Legtenberg, "Electrostatically driven vacuum-encapsulated polysilicon resonators: Part II. Theory and Performance", Sensors Actuators A, vol. 45, pp. 67--84, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. C. O'Mahony et al., "Analysis of Electromechanical Boundary Effects on the Pull-in of Micromachined Fixed--Fixed Beams", Journal of Micromech. and Microengr, vol. 13, pp. 75--80, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. P. M. Osterberg, "Electrostatically Actuated Microelectromechanical Test Structures for Material Property Measurements", Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, 1995, pp. 52--87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. S. Chowdhury, M. Ahmadi and W. C. Miller, "Pull-in voltage calculations for MEMS sensors with cantilevered beams," NEWCAS, pp. 143--146, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. S. Gorthi, A. Mohanty and A. Chatterjee, "Cantilever beam electrostatic MEMS actuators beyond pull-in," J. Micromech. Microeng, vol. 16, pp. 1800--1810, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. S. Pamidighantam, R. Puers, K. Baert and H. Tilman, Pull-in voltage analysis of electrostatically actuated beam structures with fixed--fixed and fixed-free end conditions, J. Micromech. Microeng, vol. 12, pp. 458--464, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Y. C. Hu et al., "Closed form solutions for the pull-in voltage of micro curled beams subjected to electrostatic loads," J. Micromech. Microeng, vol. 16, pp. 648--655, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. D. A. Czaplewski et al., "A nanomechanical switch for integration with CMOS logic," J. Micromech. Microeng, vol. 19, 085003, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. R. Maboudian and R. T. Howe, "Critical Review: Adhesion in Surface Micromechanical Structures," Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B, vol. 15, 1997, pp. 1--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. M. Di Ventra, S. Evoy, and J. R. Heflin, Introduction to Nanoscale Science and Technology, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Design and analysis of compact ultra energy-efficient logic gates using laterally-actuated double-electrode NEMS

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DAC '10: Proceedings of the 47th Design Automation Conference
      June 2010
      1036 pages
      ISBN:9781450300025
      DOI:10.1145/1837274

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 June 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,770of5,499submissions,32%

      Upcoming Conference

      DAC '24
      61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
      June 23 - 27, 2024
      San Francisco , CA , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader