Joan Llobera
Abstract
An experiment was carried out to examine the impact on electrodermal activity of people when approached by groups of one or four virtual characters at varying distances. It was premised on the basis of proxemics theory that the closer the approach of the virtual characters to the participant, the greater the level of physiological arousal. Physiological arousal was measured by the number of skin conductance responses within a short time period after the approach, and the maximum change in skin conductance level 5 s after the approach. The virtual characters were each either female or a cylinder of human size, and one or four characters approached each subject a total of 12 times. Twelve male subjects were recruited for the experiment. The results suggest that the number of skin conductance responses after the approach and the change in skin conductance level increased the closer the virtual characters approached toward the participants. Moreover, these response variables were inversely correlated with the number of visits, showing a typical adaptation effect. There was some evidence to suggest that the number of characters who simultaneously approached (one or four) was positively associated with the responses. Surprisingly there was no evidence of a difference in response between the humanoid characters and cylinders on the basis of this physiological data. It is suggested that the similarity in this quantitative arousal response to virtual characters and virtual objects might mask a profound difference in qualitative response, an interpretation supported by questionnaire and interview results. Overall the experiment supported the premise that people exhibit heightened physiological arousal the closer they are approached by virtual characters.
- Bailenson, J., Blascovich, J., Beall, A., and Loomis, J. 2003. Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Person. Soc. Psych. Bull. 29, 819--833.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Bailenson, J. N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., and Loomis, J. M. 2001. Equilibrium theory revisited: Mutual gaze and personal space in virtual environments. Pres. Teleop. Virt. Environ. 10, 583--598. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Beltran, F. S., Salas, L., and Quera, V. 2006. Spatial behavior in groups: An agent-based approach. J. Artific. Soc. Soc. Simul. 9, 3, 1--16.Google Scholar
- Bideau, B., Kulpa, R., Menardais, S., Fradet, L., Multon, F., Delamarche, P., and Arnaldi, B. 2003. Real handball goalkeeper vs. virtual handball thrower. Pres. Teleop. Virt. Environ. 12, 411--421. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Blascovich, J. 2002. Social influence within immersive virtual environments. In The Social Life of Avatars: Presence and Interaction in Shared Virtual Environments, Springer CSCW Series. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. 127--145. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Blascovich, J., Loomis, J., Beall, A., Swinth, K., Hoyt, C., and Bailenson, J. 2002. Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psych. Inquir. 13, 103--124.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Boucsein, W. 1992. Electrodermal Activity. Plenum Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Brooks, A. G. and Arkin, R. C. 2007. Behavioral overlays for non-verbal communication expression on a humanoid robot. Auton. Rob. 22, 55--74. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carrozzino, M., Tecchia, F., Bacinelli, S., Cappelletti, C., and Bergamasco, M. 2005. Lowering the development time of multimodal interactive application: The real-life experience of the XVR project. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology ACM Press New York, NY, 270--273. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cruz-Neira, C., Sandin, D. J., and Defanti, T. A. 1993. Surround-screen projection-based virtual reality: The design and implementation of the CAVE. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. 135--142. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Draper, J. V., Kaber, D. B., and Usher, J. M. 1998. Telepresence. Hum. Fact. 40, 354--375.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dror, H. A. and Steinberg, D. M. 2006. Robust experimental design for multivariate generalized linear models. Technomet. 48, 520--529.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Friedman, D., Steed, A., and Slater, M. 2007. Spatial social behavior in second life. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4722. Springer, Berlin, Germany, 252--263. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guye-Vuilleme, A., Capin, T. K., Pandzic, S., Thalmann, N. M., and Thalmann, D. 1999. Nonverbal communication interface for collaborative virtual environments. Virt. Real. 4, 49--59.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hall, E. T. 1973. The hidden dimension. Leonardo 94--94.Google Scholar
- Hudson, T. C., Seeger, A., Weber, H., Juliano, J., and Helser, A. T. 2001. VRPN: A device-independent, network-transparent VR peripheral system. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. ACM New York, NY, 55--61. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jarque, C. M. and Bera, A. K. 1980. Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals. Econom. Lett. 6, 255--259.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McBride, G., King, M. G., and James, J. W. 1965. Social proximity effects on galvanic skin responses in adult humans. J. Psych. 61, 153.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A. 1989. Generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, London, U. K. New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Noë, A. 2004. Action In Perception. Bradford Books Series. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Pertaub, D. P., Slater, M., and Barker, C. 2002. An experiment on public speaking anxiety in response to three different types of virtual audience. Pres.-Teleop. Virt. Environ. 11, 68--78. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sanchez-Vives, M. V. and Slater, M. 2005. From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nat. Rev. Neurosc. 6, 332--339.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sheridan, T. B. 1992. Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Pres. Teleop. Virt. Environ. 1, 120--126. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sheridan, T. B. 1996. Further musings on the psychophysics of presence. Pres. Teleop. Virt. Environ. 5, 241--246.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Slater, M. 2009. Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philos Trans R Soc Lond. In Press.Google Scholar
- Slater, M., Antley, A., Davison, A., Swapp, D., Guger, C., Barker, C., Pistrang, N., and Sanchez-Vives, M. V. 2006. A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments. PLoS ONE 1, e39. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000039.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Spanlang, B. 2009. HALCA: A Hardware accelerated library for character animation EVENT Lab. Facultat de Psicologia, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
- Wilcox, L. M., Allison, R. S., Elfassy, S., and Grelik, C. 2006. Personal space in virtual reality. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 3, 412--428. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Proxemics with multiple dynamic characters in an immersive virtual environment
Recommendations
Reinforcement learning utilizes proxemics: An avatar learns to manipulate the position of people in immersive virtual reality
A reinforcement learning (RL) method was used to train a virtual character to move participants to a specified location. The virtual environment depicted an alleyway displayed through a wide field-of-view head-tracked stereo head-mounted display. Based ...
The role of posture in the communication of affect in an immersive virtual environment
VRCIA '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM international conference on Virtual reality continuum and its applicationsThis paper presents an experiment that investigates the importance of nonverbal behavioral cues when designing affective virtual characters for an immersive virtual environment (IVE).Forty-nine participants were each instructed to explore a virtual ...
Investigating Social Distances between Humans, Virtual Humans and Virtual Robots in Mixed Reality
AAMAS '18: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent SystemsMixed reality environments offer new potentials for the design of compelling social interaction experiences with virtual characters. In this paper, we summarise initial experiments we are conducting in which we measure comfortable social distances ...
Comments