skip to main content
10.1145/191246.191314acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Finding interesting rules from large sets of discovered association rules

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 November 1994Publication History

ABSTRACT

Association rules, introduced by Agrawal, Imielinski, and Swami, are rules of the form “for 90% of the rows of the relation, if the row has value 1 in the columns in set W, then it has 1 also in column B”. Efficient methods exist for discovering association rules from large collections of data. The number of discovered rules can, however, be so large that browsing the rule set and finding interesting rules from it can be quite difficult for the user. We show how a simple formalism of rule templates makes it possible to easily describe the structure of interesting rules. We also give examples of visualization of rules, and show how a visualization tool interfaces with rule templates.

References

  1. 1.Rakesh Agrawal, Tomasz Imielinski, and Arun Swami. Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In Proceedings o/ the 1993 Internatzonal ConJerence on Management of Data (SIGMOD 93), pages 207- 216, May 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Rakesh Agrawal and Ramakrishnan Srikant. Fast algorithms for mining association rules in large databases. In VLDB '94. September 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.G.H. Collier. Thot-II: Hypertext with explicit semantics. In ACM Hypertext '87 Proceedings, pages 269 - 289, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, November 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.E. It. Gansner, S. C. North, and K. P. Vo. DAG a program that draws directed graphs. Software-- Practice and Experience, 18(11):1047- 1062, November 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Jiawei Hail, Yandong Cai, and Nick Cercone. Knowledge discovery in databases: an attribute-oriented approach, in Proceedings of the 18th Internatzonal Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB), pages 547- 559, August 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Peter H oschka and Willi K15sgen. A support system for interpreting statistical data. In Gregory Piatetsky- Shapiro and William J. Frawley, editors, Knowledge Dzscovery in Databases, pages 325 - 345. AAAI Press / The MIT Press, Menlo Park, CA, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.K. W. Kolence. Tile software empiricist. Performance Evaluation Review, 2(2):31 - 36, 1973. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.K. W. Kolence and P. J. Kiviat. Software unit profiles and Kiviat figures. Performance Evaluation Rewew, 2(3):2- 12, 1973. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Heikki Mannila, Hannu Toivonen, and A. Inkeri Verkamo. Efficient algorithms for discovering association rules. In Usama M. Fayyad and Ramasamy Uthurusamy, editors, AAA1 Workshop on Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pages 181 - 192, Seattle, Washington, July 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.S. Moen. Drawing dynamic trees. IEEE Software, 7(4):21 - 28. July 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.F. N. Paulisch and W. F. Tichy. EDGE: An extendible graph editor. Software--Practzce and Experience, 20(S1):63 - 88, June 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.Gregory Piatetsky-Shapiro. Discovery, analysis, and presentation of strong rules. In Gregory Piatetsky- Shapiro and William 3. Frawley, editors, Knowledge Dzscovery ,n Databases, pages 229- 248. AAAI Press / The MIT Press, Menlo Park, CA. 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Gregory Piatetsky-Shapiro and William J. Frawley, editors. Knowledge D,scovery in Databases. AAAI Press / The MIT Press, Menlo Park, CA, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.Gregory Piatetsky-Shapiro and Christopher J. Matheus. The interestingness of deviations. In Usarea M. Fayyad and Ramasamy Uthurusamy. editors, AAAI Workshop on Knowledge Discovery #n Databases. pages 25- 36, Seattle, Washington, July 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.L. A. Rowe, M. Davis, E. Messinger, C. Meyer, C. Spirakis, and A. Tuan. A browser for directed graphs. Software#Practice and Experience, 17(1):61 - 76, January 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.J. Q. Walker II. A node-positioning algorithm for general trees. Software--Practzce and Expemence, 20(7):685 - 705, July 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Finding interesting rules from large sets of discovered association rules

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CIKM '94: Proceedings of the third international conference on Information and knowledge management
          November 1994
          463 pages
          ISBN:0897916743
          DOI:10.1145/191246

          Copyright © 1994 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 29 November 1994

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

          Upcoming Conference

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader