skip to main content
10.1145/1943403.1943432acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Predicting and compensating for lexicon access errors

Published:13 February 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Learning a foreign language is a long, error-prone process, and much of a learner's time is effectively spent studying vocabulary. Many errors occur because words are only partly known, and this makes their mental storage and retrieval problematic. This paper describes how an intelligent interface may take advantage of the access structure of the mental lexicon to help predict the types of mistakes that learners make, and thus compensate for them. We give two examples, firstly a dictionary interface which circumvents the tip-of-the-tongue problem through search-by-similarity, and secondly an adaptive test generator which leverages user errors to generate plausible multiple-choice distractors.

References

  1. G. A. Alvarez and P. Cavanagh. The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science: a Journal of the American Psychological Society, 15(2):106--11, Feb. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. Bilac. Intelligent dictionary interface for learners of Japanese. Master's thesis, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Brown and N. Iwashita. Language background and item difficulty: the development of a computer-adaptive test of Japanese. System, 24(2):199--206, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. J. C. Brown, G. A. Frishkoff, and M. Eskenazi. Automatic question generation for vocabulary assessment. In HLT '05: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 819--826, Vancouver, Canada, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. Brown and D. McNeill. The "Tip of the Tongue" Phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5:325--337, 1966.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. Bull and C. McKenna. Blueprint for Computer-Assisted Assessment. Routledge Falmer, London, UK, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. C. Collins. WordNet Explorer: Applying Visualization Principles to Lexical Semantics. Technical report, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. Halpern, editor. The Kodansha Kanji Learner's Dictionary. Kodansha International, Tokyo, Japan, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Hoshino, L. Huan, and H. Nakagawa. A Framework for Automatic Generation of Grammar and Vocabulary Questions. In Proceedings of the WorldCALL 2008 Conference, pages 179--182, Fukuoka, Japan, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. T. Joyce. Lexical access and the mental lexicon for two-kanji compound words: A priming paradigm study. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, pages 1--12, Blacksburg, VA, USA, July 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. H. Kunichika, M. Urushima, T. Hirashima, and A. Takeuchi. Realizing Adaptive Questions and Answers for ICALL Systems. In Proceeding of the 2005 Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning through Intelligent and Socially Informed Technology, pages 854--856, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. B. Laufer. How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In P. Arnaud and H. Bejoint, editors, Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics, pages 126--132. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. B. Laufer. The lexical plight in second language reading; words you don't know, words you think you know, and words you can't guess. In J. Coady and T. Huckin, editors, Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition, Cambridge Applied Linguistics, pages 20--34. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. B. Laufer and Z. Goldstein. Testing Vocabulary Knowledge: Size, Strength, and Computer Adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54(3):399--436, Sept. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. S. J. Lupker. Visual word recognition: Theories and findings. In M. J. Snowling and C. Hulme, editors, The Science of Reading: A Handbook, chapter 3. Blackwell Publishing, Carlton, Australia, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J. L. McClelland and D. E. Rumelhart. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception, Part 1: An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88:375--407, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. F. Moerdijk, C. Tiberius, and J. Niestadt. Accessing the ANW dictionary. In Proceedings of the 2008 Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of the Lexicon, pages 18--24, Manchester, UK, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. I. S. P. Nation. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. S. Nikolova, X. Ma, M. Tremaine, and P. Cook. Vocabulary Navigation Made Easier. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 361--364, Hong Kong, China, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. E. Rich. Users are individuals: individualising user models. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 18:199--214, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. H. Saito, H. Masuda, and M. Kawakami. Form and sound similarity effects in kanji recognition. Reading and Writing, 10(3 - 5):323--357, Oct. 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. A. L. Strehl, L. Li, E. Wiewiora, J. Langford, and M. L. Littman. PAC model-free reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 881--888, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. E. Sumita, F. Sugaya, and S. Yamamoto. Measuring non-native speakers' proficiency of English by using a test with automatically-generated fill-in-the-blank questions. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Building Educational Applications Using NLP, pages 61--68, Ann Arbor, USA, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. K. Tanaka-Ishii and J. Godon. Kansuke: A kanji look-up system based on a few stroke prototype. In Proceedings of 21st International Conference on Computer Processing of Oriental Languages, Sentosa, Singapore, December 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. S. Urquhart and C. Weir. Reading in a Second Language: Process, Product and Practice. Longman, New York, USA, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. C. J. C. H. Watkins and P. Dayan. Techincal Note: Q-Learning. Machine Learning, 8(3-4):279--292, May 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. T. N. Wydell, B. Butterworth, and K. Patterson. The inconsistency of consistency effects in reading: The case of Japanese kanji. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21(5):1155--1168, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. S.-L. Yeh and J.-L. Li. Role of structure and component in judgments of visual similarity of Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(4):933--947, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. L. Yencken and T. Baldwin. Efficient grapheme-phoneme alignment for Japanese. In Proceedings of the Australasian Language Technology Workshop 2005, pages 143--151, Sydney, Australia, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. L. Yencken and T. Baldwin. Measuring and predicting orthographic associations: Modelling the similarity of Japanese kanji. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Manchester, UK, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Predicting and compensating for lexicon access errors

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IUI '11: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
      February 2011
      504 pages
      ISBN:9781450304191
      DOI:10.1145/1943403

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 February 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader