ABSTRACT
While much of human-robot interaction research focuses upon people interacting with autonomous robots, there is also much to be gained from exploring human interpersonal interaction through robots. The current study focuses on mobile remote presence (MRP) systems as used by a population who could potentially benefit from more social connectivity and communication with remote people - older adults. Communication technologies are important for ensuring safety, independence, and social support for older adults, thereby potentially improving their quality of life and maintaining their independence [24]. However, before such technologies would be accepted and used by older adults, it is critical to understand their perceptions of the benefits, concerns, and adoption criteria for MRP systems. As such, we conducted a needs assessment with twelve volunteer participants (ages 63-88), who were given first-hand experience with both meeting a visitor via the MRP system and driving the MRP system to visit that person. The older adult participants identified benefits such as being able to see and be seen via the MRP system, reducing travel costs and hassles, and reducing social isolation. Among the concerns identified were etiquette of using the MRP, personal privacy, and overuse of the system. Some new use-cases were identified that have not yet been explored in prior work, for example, going to museums, attending live performances, and visiting friends who are hospitalized. The older adults in the current study preferred to operate the MRP themselves, rather than to be visited by others operating the MRP system. More findings are discussed in terms of their implications for design.
- Boissy, P., Corriveau, H., Michaud, F., Labonte, D. and Royer, M.-P. 2007. A qualitative study of in-home robotic telepresence for home care of community-living elderly subjects. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 13, 79--84.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Caine, K. E., Fisk, A. D. and Rogers, W. A. 2007. Designing privacy conscious aware homes for older adults. In Proceedings of HFES.Google Scholar
- Cesta, A., Cortellessa, G., Giuliani, M. V., Pecora, F., Scopelliti, M. and Tiberio, L. 2007. Psychological implications of domestic assistive technology for the elderly. PsychNology Journal 5, 3.Google Scholar
- Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S. N., Rogers, W. A. and Sharit, J. 2006. Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging 21, 333--352.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S., Kaouri, C., Walters, M., Koay, K. L. and Werry, I. 2005. What is a robot companion-Friend, assistant or butler? In Proceedings of IROS, IEEE, 1488--1493. DOI=10.1109/IROS.2005.1545189Google Scholar
- Demiris, G., Rantz, M. J., Aud, M. A., Marek, K. D., Tyrer, H. W., Skubic, M. and Hussam, A. A. 2004. Older adults' attitudes toward and perceptions of 'smart home' technologies: A pilot study. Informatics for Health and Social Care 29, 87--94.Google Scholar
- Ezer, N., Fisk, A. D. and Roger, W. A. 2009. More than a servant: Self-reported willingness of younger and older adults to having a robot perform interactive and critical tasks in the home. In Proceedings of HFES, 136--150. DOI=10.1518/107118109X12524441079382Google Scholar
- Forlizzi, J., DiSalvo, C. and Gemperle, F. 2004. Assistive robotics and an ecology of elders living independently in their homes. Human-Computer Interaction 19, 25--59. Google ScholarDigital Library
- GeckoSystems 2010. Gecko System Markets: Consumer Family.Google Scholar
- Gitlin, L. 2003. Conducting research on home environments: Lessons learned and new directions. The Gerontologist 43, 5, 628--637.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Giuliani, M. V., Scopelliti, M. and Fornara, F. 2005. Elderly people at home: Technological help in everyday activities. In Proceedings of RO-MAN, IEEE, 365--370.Google Scholar
- Hansen, S. T., Andersen, H. J. and Bak, T. 2010. Practical evaluation of robots for elderly in Denmark: An overview. In Proceedings of HRI, ACM, Osaka, Japan, 149--150. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1734454.1734517 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Heerink, M., Krose, B., Evers, V. and Wielinga, B. 2006. The influence fo a robot's social abilities on acceptance by elderly users. In Proceedings of RO-MAN, IEEE, 521--526.Google Scholar
- Heerink, M., Krose, B., Wielinga, B. and Evers, V. 2008. Enjoyment, intention to use and actual use of a conversational robot by elderly people. In Proceedings of HRI, ACM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 113--119. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1349822.1349838 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Heerink, M., Krose, B., Wielinga, B. and Evers, V. 2009. Measuring the influence of social abilities on acceptance of an interface robot and a screen agent by elderly users. In Proceedings of British Computer Society Conference on HCI, 430--439. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Helal, A. and Abdulrazak, B. 2006. TeCaRob: Tele-care using telepresence and robotic technology for assisting people with special needs. International Journal of ARM 7, 3, 46--53.Google Scholar
- Jouppi, N. P. 2002. First steps toward mutually-immersive mobile telepresence. In Proceedings of CSCW, ACM, New Orleans, LA, USA, 354--363. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/587078.587128 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kidd, C. D., Taggart, W. and Turkle, S. 2006. A sociable robot to encourage social interaction among the elderly. In Proceedings of ICRA, IEEE, 3972--3976.Google Scholar
- Melenhorst, A. S., Rogers, W. A. and Bouwhuis, D. G. 2006. Older adults' motivated choice for technological innovation: Evidence for benefit-driven selectivity. Psychology and Aging 21, 190--195.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michaud, F., Boissy, P., Labonte, D., Corriveau, H., Grant, A., Lauria, M., Cloutier, R., Roux, M.-A., Iannuzzi, D. and Royer, M.-P. 2007. Remote assistance in caregiving using telerobot. In Proceedings of ICTA.Google Scholar
- Morris, M., Lundell, J. and Dishman, E. 2004. Catalyzing social interaction with ubiquitous computing: A needs assessment of elders coping with cognitive decline. In Proceedings of CHI, Vienna, Austria, 1151--1154. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/985921.986011 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paulos, E. and Canny, J. 2001. Social tele-embodiment: Understanding presence. Autonomous Robots 11, 1, 87--95. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pollack, M. E., Brown, L., Colbry, D., Orosz, C., Peintner, B., Ramakrishnan, S., Engberg, S., Matthews, J. T., Dunbar-Jacob, J., McCarthy, C. E., Thrun, S., Montemerlo, M., Pineau, J. and Roy, N. 2002. Pearl: A mobile robotic assistant for the elderly AAAI Workshop on automation as caregiver.Google Scholar
- Rogers, W. A. and Mynatt, E. D. 2003. How can technology contribute to the quality of life of older adults? in The technology of humanity: Can technology contribute to the quality of life?, Mitchell, M. E. Ed. Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, 22--30.Google Scholar
- Sharit, J., Czaja, S. J., Perdomo, D. and Lee, C. C. 2004. A cost-benefit analysis methodology for assessing product adoption by older user populations. Applied Ergonomics 35, 81--92.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Taggart, W., Turkle, S. and Kidd, C. D. 2005. An interactive robot in a nursing home: Preliminary remarks CogSci workshop: Towards social mechanisms of android science.Google Scholar
- Tsai, T.-C., Hsu, Y.-L., Ma, A.-I., King, T. and Wu, C.-H. 2006. Developing a telepresence robot for interpersonal communication with the elderly in a home environment. Telemedicine and e-Health 13, 4, 407--424.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Venolia, G., Tang, J., Cervantes, R., Bly, S., Robertson, G., Lee, B. and Inkpen, K. 2010. Embodied social proxy: Mediating interpersonal connection in hub-and-satellite tams. In Proceedings of CHI, ACM, Atlanta, GA, 1049--1058. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1753326.1753482 Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Mobile remote presence systems for older adults: acceptance, benefits, and concerns
Recommendations
Recruiting Older Adults in the Wild: Reflections on Challenges and Lessons Learned from Research Experience
PervasiveHealth '18: Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for HealthcareIt is important to understand the older adults prior to the design process. The understanding can better facilitate design conversations between the researchers and the older adults. In this paper, we discussed our experiences of building a relationship ...
Older Adults' Digital Gameplay
Background. Empirical evidence suggests that digital gameplay can enhance social interaction and improve cognition for older adults. However, if digital games are to be effectively used as interventions to address age-related challenges, it is important ...
Ordinary Innovations of Older Adults: An Interview Study to Understand Interest Development in Aging
CSCW '18 Companion: Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social ComputingBuilding and maintaining personal interests are important for older adults to promote an active and healthy lifestyle. In this paper, we discuss older adults' innovative ways of developing their interests and the related influence on their health and ...
Comments