skip to main content
10.1145/1957656.1957816acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Do elderly people prefer a conversational humanoid as a shopping assistant partner in supermarkets?

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 March 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Assistive robots can be perceived in two main ways: tools or partners. In past research, assistive robots that offer physical assistance for the elderly are often designed in the context of a tool metaphor. This paper investigates the effect of two design considerations for assistive robots in a partner metaphor: conversation and robot-type. The former factor is concerned with whether robots should converse with people even if the conversation is not germane for completing the task. The latter factor is concerned with whether people prefer a communication/function oriented design for assistive robots. To test these design considerations, we selected a shopping assistance situation where a robot carries a shopping basket for elderly people, which is one typical scenario used for assistive robots. A field experiment was conducted in a real supermarket in Japan where 24 elderly participants shopped with robots. The experimental results revealed that they prefer a conversational humanoid as a shopping assistant partner.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

246h.mpg

mpg

10.1 MB

References

  1. Bogdan, C., Green, A., Huettenrauch, H. and Severinson Eklundh, K. Cooperative Design of a Robotic Shopping Trolley. In Proc. of COST-298 (European Cooperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research), 2009Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Breazeal, C., Brooks, A., Gray, J., Hoffman, G. Kidd, C. Lee, H. Lieberman, J., Lockerd, A. and Mulanda, D. Humanoid Robots as Cooperative Partners for People. International Journal of Humanoid Robots, vol. 1, no. 2, 2003Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Burgard, W., Cremers, A. B, Fox, D., Hahnel, D., Lakemeyer, G., Schulz, D., Steiner, W., and Thrun, S. The Interactive Museum Tour-Guide Robot. In Proc. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 11--18, 1998 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Dautenhahn, K., Walters, M. L., Woods, S., Koay, K. L., Nehaniv, C. L., Sisbot, E. A., Alami, R. and Siméon, T. How May I Serve You? A Robot Companion Approaching a Seated Person in a Helping Context. ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction, 172--179, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Davis, F. D. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies vol. 38, Issue 3, 475--487, 1993 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dubowsky, S. Genot, F., Godding, S., Kozono, H.,Skwersky, A., Yu, H. and Yu, L.S. PAMM: A Robotic Aid to the Elderly for Mobility Assistance and Monitoring: A "Helping-Hand" for the Elderly. IEEE Intl. Conf. On Robotics and Automation: 570--576, 2000Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I. and Dautenhahn, K. A Survey of Socially Interactive Robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 42, 143--166, 2003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Glas, D. F., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H. and Hagita, N. Field trial for simultaneous teleoperation of mobile social robots. ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human robot interaction, 149--156, 2009 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Goller M., Kerscher T., Ziegenmeyer M., Ronnau A., Zollner J. M., and Dillmann R. Haptic Control for the Interactive Behavior Operated Shopping Trolley. In Proc. of the New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction Workshop of the 2009 Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour, 2009Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Goodrich, M. A. and Schultz, A. C. Human-Robot Interaction: A Survey. Foundations and Trends in Human, Computer Interaction, vol. 1, 203--275, 2007 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Graf, B. An Adaptive Guidance System for Robotic Walking Aids. Journal of Computing and Information Technology, vol. 17, no. 1, 109--120, 2009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Gross, H.-M., Boehme, H., Schroeter, C., Mueller, S., Koenig, A., Einhorn, E., Martin, Ch., Merten, M. and Bley, A. TOOMAS: interactive shopping guide robots in everyday use - final implementation and experiences from long-term field trials. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent robots and systems, 2005--2012, 2009 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Heerink, M., Kröse, B. J. A., Evers, V., Wielinga, B. The Influence of Social Presence on Acceptance of a Companion Robot by Older People. Journal of Physical Agents, vol. 2 no. 2, 33--40, 2008Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Heerink, M., Kröse, B. J. A., Wielinga, B. J., Evers, V. Enjoyment, Intention to Use and Actual Use of a Conversational Robot by Elderly People. ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction, 113--120, 2008 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kanda, T. Ishiguro, H. Imai, M. and Ono, T. Development and Evaluation of Interactive Humanoid Robots. Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 92, no. 11, 1839--1850, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kawai, H. Toda, T. Ni, J. Tsuzaki, M. and Tokuda, K. XIMERA: a new TTS from ATR based on corpus-based technologies. 5th ISCA Speech Synthesis Workshop, 179--184, 2004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kulyukin, V., Gharpure, C. and Nicholson. J. RoboCart: Toward Robot-Assisted Navigation of Grocery Stores by the Visually Impaired, IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2845--2850, 2005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Lee, M. K., Kielser, S. Forlizzi, J, Srinivasa, S. and Rybski, P. Gracefully Mitigating Breakdowns in Robotic Services. ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction, 203--210, 2010 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lingemann, K. Nuchter, A. Hertzberg, J. and Surmann, H. Highspeed laser localization for mobile robots, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 51, 275--296, 2005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Montemerlo, M. Pineau, J. Roy, N. Thrun, S. and Varma, V. Experiences with a Mobile Robotic Guide for the Elderly. Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. Edmonton, Jul. 587--592, 2002 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Mutlu, B. and Forlizzi, J. Robots in organizations: the role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction, ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human robot interaction, 287--942, 2008 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Pollack M., E. Intelligent technology for an aging population: The use of AI to assist elders with cognitive impairment. The AI magazine vol. 26, no. 2, 9--24, 2005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Shibata, T. An overview of human interactive robots for psychological enrichment. The proceedings of IEEE Vol. 92, no. 11, 1749--1758, 2004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Shiomi, M., Sakamoto, D., Kanda, T., Ishi, C. T., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N. A Semi-autonomous Communication Robot -A Field Trial at a Train Station-. ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction, 303--310, 2008 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Siegwart R., Arras K. O., Bouabdallah S., Burnier D., Froidevaux G., Greppin X., Jensen B., Lorotte A., Mayor L., Meisser M., Philippsen R., Piguet R., Ramel G., Terrien G., and Tomatis N. Robox at Expo.02: A Large-Scale Installation of Personal Robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 42, issue 3-4, 203--222, March 2003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Weiss, A. Igelsbock, J. Tscheligi, M. Bauer, A. Kuhnlenz, K. Wollherr, D. and Buss, M. Robots Asking for Directions: The Willingness of Passers-by to Support Robots. ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction, 23--30, 2010 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Do elderly people prefer a conversational humanoid as a shopping assistant partner in supermarkets?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '11: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction
      March 2011
      526 pages
      ISBN:9781450305617
      DOI:10.1145/1957656

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 March 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader