skip to main content
10.1145/1963405.1963415acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A unified framework for recommending diverse and relevant queries

Published:28 March 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Query recommendation has been considered as an effective way to help search users in their information seeking activities. Traditional approaches mainly focused on recommending alternative queries with close search intent to the original query. However, to only take relevance into account may generate redundant recommendations to users. It is better to provide diverse as well as relevant query recommendations, so that we can cover multiple potential search intents of users and minimize the risk that users will not be satisfied. Besides, previous query recommendation approaches mostly relied on measuring the relevance or similarity between queries in the Euclidean space. However, there is no convincing evidence that the query space is Euclidean. It is more natural and reasonable to assume that the query space is a manifold. In this paper, therefore, we aim to recommend diverse and relevant queries based on the intrinsic query manifold. We propose a unified model, named manifold ranking with stop points, for query recommendation. By turning ranked queries into stop points on the query manifold, our approach can generate query recommendations by simultaneously considering both diversity and relevance in a unified way. Empirical experimental results on a large scale query log of a commercial search engine show that our approach can effectively generate highly diverse as well as closely related query recommendations.

References

  1. R. Baeza-Yates and A. Tiberi. Extracting semantic relations from query logs. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 76--85, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. Beeferman and A. Berger. Agglomerative clustering of a search engine query log. In Proceedings of the sixth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 407--416, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. P. Boldi, F. Bonchi, C. Castillo, D. Donato, and S. Vigna. Query suggestions using query-flow graphs. In Proceedings of the 2009 workshop on Web Search Click Data, pages 56--63, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. H. Cao, D. Jiang, J. Pei, Q. He, Z. Liao, E. Chen, and H. Li. Context-aware query suggestion by mining click-through and session data. In Proceeding of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 875--883, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Carbonell and J. Goldstein. The use of mmr, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. In Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 335--336, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. L. Clarke, M. Kolla, G. V. Cormack, O. Vechtomova, A. Ashkan, S. Büttcher, and I. MacKinnon. Novelty and diversity in information retrieval evaluation. In Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 659--666, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. H. Cui, J.-R. Wen, J.-Y. Nie, and W.-Y. Ma. Probabilistic query expansion using query logs. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 325--332, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. H. Deng, I. King, and M. R. Lyu. Entropy-biased models for query representation on the click graph. In Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 339--346, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Guo, G. Xu, H. Li, and X. Cheng. A unified and discriminative model for query refinement. In Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 379--386, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. He, M. Li, H.-J. Zhang, H. Tong, and C. Zhang. Manifold-ranking based image retrieval. In Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 9--16, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. K. Järvelin and J. Kekäläinen. Cumulated gain-based evaluation of ir techniques. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 20(4):422--446, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. Jones, B. Rey, O. Madani, and W. Greiner. Generating query substitutions. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 387--396, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. P. Kelly and D. Bridge. Enhancing the diversity of conversational collaborative recommendations: a comparison. Artif. Intell. Rev., 25:79--95, April 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. R. Kraft and J. Zien. Mining anchor text for query refinement. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 666--674, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. L. Li, Z. Yang, L. Liu, and M. Kitsuregawa. Query-url bipartite based approach to personalized query recommendation. In Proceedings of the 23rd national conference on Artificial intelligence, pages 1189--1194, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. H. Ma, H. Yang, I. King, and M. R. Lyu. Learning latent semantic relations from clickthrough data for query suggestion. In Proceeding of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management, pages 709--718, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Q. Mei, J. Guo, and D. Radev. Divrank: the interplay of prestige and diversity in information networks. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 1009--1018, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Q. Mei, D. Zhou, and K. Church. Query suggestion using hitting time. In Proceeding of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management, pages 469--477, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. R. Ohbuchi and T. Shimizu. Ranking on semantic manifold for shape-based 3d model retrieval. In Proceeding of the 1st ACM international conference on Multimedia information retrieval, pages 411--418, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. F. Radlinski, P. N. Bennett, B. Carterette, and T. Joachims. Redundancy, diversity and interdependent document relevance. SIGIR Forum, 43(2):46--52, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. Theobald, R. Schenkel, and G. Weikum. Efficient and self-tuning incremental query expansion for top-k query processing. In Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 242--249, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. X. Wan, J. Yang, and J. Xiao. Manifold-ranking based topic-focused multi-document summarization. In Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence, pages 2903--2908, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. J.-R. Wen, J.-Y. Nie, and H.-J. Zhang. Clustering user queries of a search engine. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 162--168, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. J. Xu and W. B. Croft. Query expansion using local and global document analysis. In Proceedings of the 19th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 4--11, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. M. Zhang. Enhancing diversity in top-n recommendation. In Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems, pages 397--400, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. D. Zhou, O. Bousquet, T. N. Lal, J. Weston, and B. Schölkopf. Learning with local and global consistency. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. D. Zhou, J. Weston, A. Gretton, O. Bousquet, and B. Schölkopf. Ranking on data manifolds. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. X. Zhu, A. B. Goldberg, J. V. Gael, and D. Andrzejewski. Improving diversity in ranking using absorbing random walks. In Proceedings North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics - Human Language Technologies (NAACL HLT), pages 97--104, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WWW '11: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web
    March 2011
    840 pages
    ISBN:9781450306324
    DOI:10.1145/1963405

    Copyright © 2011 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 28 March 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader