skip to main content
10.1145/1964921.1965000acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Nonlinear revision control for images

Published:25 July 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Revision control is a vital component of digital project management and has been widely deployed for text files. Binary files, on the other hand, have received relatively less attention. This can be inconvenient for graphics applications that use a significant amount of binary data, such as images, videos, meshes, and animations. Existing strategies such as storing whole files for individual revisions or simple binary deltas could consume significant storage and obscure vital semantic information. We present a nonlinear revision control system for images, designed with the common digital editing and sketching workflows in mind. We use DAG (directed acyclic graph) as the core structure, with DAG nodes representing editing operations and DAG edges the corresponding spatial, temporal and semantic relationships. We visualize our DAG in RevG (revision graph), which provides not only as a meaningful display of the revision history but also an intuitive interface for common revision control operations such as review, replay, diff, addition, branching, merging, and conflict resolving. Beyond revision control, our system also facilitates artistic creation processes in common image editing and digital painting workflows. We have built a prototype system upon GIMP, an open source image editor, and demonstrate its effectiveness through formative user study and comparisons with alternative revision control systems.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

tp106_11.mp4

mp4

13.9 MB

References

  1. Abram, G. D., and Whitted, T. 1990. Building block shaders. In SIGGRAPH '90, 283--288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bavoil, L., Callahan, S. P., Scheidegger, C. E., Vo, H. T., Crossno, P. J., Silva, C. T., and Freire, J. 2005. Vistrails: Enabling interactive multiple-view visualizations. In Visualization 2005, 135--142.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonanni, L., Xiao, X., Hockenberry, M., Subramani, P., Ishii, H., Seracini, M., and Schulze, J. 2009. Wetpaint: scraping through multi-layered images. In CHI '09, 571--574. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Convard, T., and Bourdot, P. 2004. History based reactive objects for immersive cad. In SM '04: Symposium on Solid modeling and applications, 291--296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cook, S. A. 1971. The complexity of theorem-proving procedures. In STOC '71: Symposium on Theory of computing, 151--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cook, R. L. 1984. Shade trees. In SIGGRAPH '84, 223--231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Edwards, W. K., and Mynatt, E. D. 1997. Timewarp: techniques for autonomous collaboration. In CHI '97, 218--225. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Edwards, W. K., Igarashi, T., LaMarca, A., and Mynatt, E. D. 2000. A temporal model for multi-level undo and redo. In UIST '00, 31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Estublier, J., Leblang, D., Hoek, A. v. d., Conradi, R., Clemm, G., Tichy, W., and Wiborg-Weber, D. 2005. Impact of software engineering research on the practice of software configuration management. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 14, 4, 383--430. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fairchild, K. M., Poltrock, S. E., and Furnas, G. W. 1999. Readings in information visualization. ch. SemNet: three-dimensional graphic representations of large knowledge bases, 190--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gansner, E. R., Koutsofios, E., North, S. C., and Vo, K.-P. 1993. A technique for drawing directed graphs. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 19, 3, 214--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Grabler, F., Agrawala, M., Li, W., Dontcheva, M., and Igarashi, T. 2009. Generating photo manipulation tutorials by demonstration. In SIGGRAPH '09, 66:1--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Grossman, T., Matejka, J., and Fitzmaurice, G. 2010. Chronicle: capture, exploration, and playback of document workflow histories. In UIST '10, 143--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hartmann, B., Yu, L., Allison, A., Yang, Y., and Klemmer, S. R. 2008. Design as exploration: creating interface alternatives through parallel authoring and runtime tuning. In UIST '08, 91--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Heer, J., and Card, S. K. 2004. Doitrees revisited: scalable, space-constrained visualization of hierarchical data. In AVI '04: Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, 421--424. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Heer, J., Card, S. K., and Landay, J. A. 2005. prefuse: a toolkit for interactive information visualization. In CHI '05, 421--430. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Heer, J., Mackinlay, J., Stolte, C., and Agrawala, M. 2008. Graphical histories for visualization: Supporting analysis, communication, and evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 14, 6, 1189--1196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hoppe, H. 1996. Progressive meshes. In SIGGRAPH '96, 99--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Hunt, J. J., Vo, K.-P., and Tichy, W. F. 1998. Delta algorithms: an empirical analysis. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 7, 2, 192--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Itti, L., Koch, C., and Niebur, E. 1998. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20 (November), 1254--1259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jackson, D., and Ladd, D. A. 1994. Semantic diff: A tool for summarizing the effects of modifications. In ICSM '94: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance, 243--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Jacobsen, J., Schlenker, T., and Edwards, L. 2005. Implementing a Digital Asset Management System: For Animation, Computer Games, and Web Development. Focal Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Klemmer, S. R., Thomsen, M., Phelps-Goodman, E., Lee, R., and Landay, J. A. 2002. Where do web sites come from?: capturing and interacting with design history. In CHI '02, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Kurihara, K., Vronay, D., and Igarashi, T. 2005. Flexible timeline user interface using constraints. In CHI '05, 1581--1584. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Kurlander, D. 1993. Chimera: example-based graphical editing. In Watch what I do: programming by demonstration, 271--290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Lau, T. 2010. Rethinking the systems review process. Commun. ACM 53 (November), 10--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Levoy, M. 1994. Spreadsheets for images. In SIGGRAPH '94, 139--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Myers, B. A., McDaniel, R. G., Miller, R. C., Ferrency, A. S., Faulring, A., Kyle, B. D., Mickish, A., Klimovitski, A., and Doane, P. 1997. The amulet environment: New models for effective user interface software development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 23, 347--365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Nakamura, T., and Igarashi, T. 2008. An application-independent system for visualizing user operation history. In UIST '08, 23--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Shneiderman, B. 2007. Creativity support tools: accelerating discovery and innovation. Commun. ACM 50 (December), 20--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Su, S. L., Paris, S., Aliaga, F., Scull, C., Johnson, S., and Durand, F. 2009. Interactive visual histories for vector graphics. Tech. Rep. MIT-CSAIL-TR-2009-031, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, June.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Terry, M., and Mynatt, E. D. 2002. Recognizing creative needs in user interface design. In C&C '02: Proceedings of the 4th conference on Creativity & cognition, 38--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Terry, M., Mynatt, E. D., Nakakoji, K., and Yamamoto, Y. 2004. Variation in element and action: supporting simultaneous development of alternative solutions. In CHI '04, 711--718. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Yee, H., Pattanaik, S., and Greenberg, D. P. 2001. Spatiotemporal sensitivity and visual attention for efficient rendering of dynamic environments. ACM Trans. Graph. 20, 1, 39--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Nonlinear revision control for images

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGGRAPH '11: ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 papers
      August 2011
      869 pages
      ISBN:9781450309431
      DOI:10.1145/1964921

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 July 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGGRAPH '11 Paper Acceptance Rate82of432submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGGRAPH '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader