skip to main content
10.1145/1967486.1967546acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiiwasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Natural language processing technologies for developing a language learning environment

Published:08 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

So far, Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) comes in many different flavors. Our research work focuses on developing an integrated e-learning environment that allows improving language skills in specific contexts. Integrated e-learning environment means that it is a Web-based solution that performs language learning tasks using common working environments like, for instance, Web browsers or Email clients. It should be accessible on different platforms, even on mobile devices. Natural Language Processing (NLP) forms the technological basis for developing such a learning framework. The paper gives an overview of the state-of-the-art in this area. Therefore, on the one hand, it explains creation processes for NLP resources and gives an overview of corpora. On the other hand, it describes existing NLP standards. Based on our requirements, the paper gives special attention to the evaluation and comparison of toolkits that can suitably support the planned implementation. An outlook at the end points out necessary developments in e-learning to keep in mind.

References

  1. Baker, C. F., Filmore, C. J., Lowe, J. B. The Berkeley FrameNet Project. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics -- Volume 1, pp. 86--90. Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Boguraev, B. and Ando, R. K. TimeML-Compliant Text Analysis for Temporal Reasoning. Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 997--1003. Edinburgh, Scotland, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Buitelaar, P., Cimiano, P., Frank, A., Racioppa, S. SOBA: SmartWeb Ontology-based Annotation. Proceedings of the Demo Session at the International Semantic Web Conference. Athens, Greece, 2006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Carstensen, K.-U., Ebert, Ch., Endriss, C., Jekat, S., Klabunde, R., and Langer, H. Computerlinguistik und Sprachtechnologie. (2nd edition). Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Munich, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Cunningham, H., Wilks, Y., Gaizauskas, R. J. GATE -- a General Architecture for Text Engineering. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pp. 1057--1060. Copenhagen, Denmark, August 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Doddington, G., Mitchell, A., Przybocki, M., Ramshaw, L., Strassel, S., Weischedel, R. The Automatic Content Extraction (ACE) Program -- Tasks, Data, and Evaluation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pp. 837--840. Lisbon, Portugal, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Emele, M. C. 1994. The Typed Feature Structure Representation Formalism. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Sharable Natural Language Resources. Ikoma, Nara, August 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Francopoulo, G., Bel, N., George, M., Calzolari, N., Monachini, M., Pet, M., Soria, C. Lexical Markup Framework: ISO standard for semantic information in NLP lexicons. Tubingen, Germany, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Frank, A., Becker, M., Crysmann, B., Kiefer, B., Schäfer, U. Integrated Shallow and Deep Parsing: TopP meets HPSG. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 104--111, Sapporo, Japan, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gaes, F. Principles and Practice of Semantic Web Reasoning. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gildea, D. and Martha Palmer, M. The Necessity of Parsing for Predicate Argument Recognition. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 239--246, Philadelphia, USA, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Huang, Chu-ren, Calzolari, N., Gangemi, A., Lenci, A., Oltramari, A., Prevot, L. Ontology and the Lexicon: A Natural Language Processing Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Indurkhya, I., Damerau, F. J. (eds.). Handbook of Natural Language Processing. Chapman & Hall/CRC Machine Learning & Pattern Recognition, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. ISO/TC 37/SC 4 N453. Language Resource Management -- Lexical Markup Framework (LMF), LMF-revision-16, ISO FDIS 24613:2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. ISO/TC 37/SC 4/WG1. Language Resource Management -- Feature Structures -- Part 1: Feature Structure Representation. ISO/DIS 24610-1, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kingsbury, P. and Palmer, M. From Treebank to PropBank. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC). Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. LMF. The Lexical Markup Framework. http://www.lexicalmarkupframework.org (accessed 06 01, 2010)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mitkov R. The Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Palmer, M., Gildea, D. and Kingsbury, P. The Proposition Bank: A Corpus Annotated with Semantic Roles. Computational Linguistics Journal, no. 31:1. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Petasis, G., Karkaletsis, V., Paliouras, G. Androutsopoulos, I. and Spyropoulos, C. D. 2002. Ellogon: A New Text Engineering Platform. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 72--78. Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Sag, I. A., Wasow, T. and Bender, E. M. Syntactic Theory (2nd edition). Stanford, CSLI Publications, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sauri, R. Littman, J., Knippen, B., Gaizauskas, R., Setzer, A. and Pustejovsky, J. TimeML Annotation Guidelines Version 1.2.1, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Schäfer, U. Integrating Deep and Shallow Natural Language Processing Components -- Representations and Hybrid Architectures. Saarbrücken Dissertations in Computational Linguistics and Language, Vol. 22, DFKI GmbH and Computational Linguistics Department, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Schäfer, U. Shallow, Deep and Hybrid Processing with UIMA and Heart of Gold. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Workshop Towards Enhanced Interoperability for Large HLT Systems: UIMA for NLP, pp. 43--50. Marrakesh, Morocco, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. SpatialML: Annotation Scheme for Marking Spatial Expressions in Natural Language. Version 3.1. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Natural language processing technologies for developing a language learning environment
                        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

                        Recommendations

                        Comments

                        Login options

                        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                        Sign in
                        • Published in

                          cover image ACM Other conferences
                          iiWAS '10: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services
                          November 2010
                          895 pages
                          ISBN:9781450304214
                          DOI:10.1145/1967486

                          Copyright © 2010 ACM

                          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                          Publisher

                          Association for Computing Machinery

                          New York, NY, United States

                          Publication History

                          • Published: 8 November 2010

                          Permissions

                          Request permissions about this article.

                          Request Permissions

                          Check for updates

                          Qualifiers

                          • research-article

                        PDF Format

                        View or Download as a PDF file.

                        PDF

                        eReader

                        View online with eReader.

                        eReader