James Pierce
Eric Paulos
ABSTRACT
We present a qualitative study of reacquisition-the acquisition of previously possessed goods-involving in-depth interviews with 18 reacquirers within or nearby Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Based on critiques of sustainable consumption and our findings, we reframe technology consumption as acquisition, possession, dispossession and reacquisition. We present four reacquisition orientations describing our participants' motivations and practices: casual, necessary, critical, and experiential. We then present a range of findings including issues with work, time and effort involved in reacquisition, and values and practices of care and patience associated with invested reacquirers. We conclude with implications for designing technologies to support current reacquisition practices, as well as broader opportunities for HCI and interaction design to incorporate non-mainstream reacquisition practices and values into more mainstream technologies.
- Baudrillard, J. (1968). The system of objects. Verso.Google Scholar
- Blevis, E. (2007). Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse. Proc. CHI '07. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Blythe, M., Overbeeke, K. Monk, A. & Wright, P. eds. (2004). Funology: from Usability to Enjoyment. Kluwer. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the character of contemporary life. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Buechley et al. (2009). DIY for CHI: methods, communities, and values of reuse. CHI '09 E.A. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brynjarsdóttir, H. & Sengers, P. Ubicomp from the Edge of the North Atlantic: Lessons from Fishing Villages in Iceland and Newfoundland. Ubicomp '09 workshop.Google Scholar
- Cooper, T. (2008). Slower Consumption Reflections on Product Life Spans and the "Throwaway Society". Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(1--2):51--67.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Douglas, M. & Isherwood, B. (1979). The world of goods: Towards an anthropology of consumption. Basic books.Google Scholar
- Fry, T. (2009). Design futuring. Berg.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fry, T. (1994). Remakings. Envirobooks.Google Scholar
- Gaver, W., Beaver, J.,& Benford, S. (2003).Ambiguity as a resource for design. Proc. CHI '03. 233--240. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Sociology Press.Google Scholar
- Gregson, N. & Crewe, L. (2003). Second-hand cultures. Berg.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hanks, K., Odom, W., Roedl, D., and Blevis, E. (2008). Sustainable millennials: attitudes towards sustainability and the material effects of interactive technologies. Proc. CHI '08. 333--342. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huang & Truong. (2008). Breaking the disposable technology paradigm: opportunities for sustainable interaction design for mobile phones. Proc. CHI '08. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huh, J., Nathan, L. P., Silberman, S., Blevis, E., Tomlinson, B., Sengers, P., & Busse, D. (2010). Examining appropriation, re-use, and maintenance for sustainability. In Ext. Abst. CHI '10. 4457--4460. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huh, J., Nam, K., & Sharma, N. 2010. Finding the lost treasure: understanding reuse of used computing devices. In Proc. CHI '10. 1875--187. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lastovicka, J. & Fernandez, K. (2005). Three paths to disposition: The movement of meaningful possessions to strangers. Jour. Cons. Research, 31(4):813--823.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lucas, G. (2002). Disposability and Dispossession in the Twentieth Century. Jour. Material Culture, 7(1):5--22.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Miller, D, ed. (1998). Material cultures: Why some things matter. University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Odom, W., Pierce, J., Stolterman, E., & Blevis, E. (2009). Understanding why we preserve some things and discard others in the context of interaction design. Proc. CHI '09. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Roux, D. & Kourchia, M. (2006). I am what I wear?: An exploratory study of symbolic meanings associated with secondhand clothing. Advances in cons. research, 33:1--7.Google Scholar
- Satchell, C. & Dourish, P. Beyond the user: use and non-use in HCI. Proc. OZCHI '09. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., & Kaye, J. (2005). Reflective design. Proc. Critical Computing. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, cleanliness & convenience: the social organization of normality. Berg.Google Scholar
- Thomas, V. M. (2003). Demand and dematerialization impacts of second-hand markets: Reuse or more use? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 7(2): 65--78.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Verbeek, P-P. (2005). What things do: philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Penn. Stat.Google Scholar
- Wakkary & Tanenbaum. (2009). A sustainable identity: the creativity of an everyday designer. Proc. CHI '09. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3Woodruff et al. (2008). A bright green perspective on sustainable choices. Proc. CHI '08.. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Second-hand interactions: investigating reacquisition and dispossession practices around domestic objects
Recommendations
Applying the lens of sensory ethnography to sustainable HCI
Special issue on practice-oriented approaches to sustainable HCISociological appropriations of practice theory as applied to sustainable design have successfully problematized overly simplistic and individualistic models of consumer choice and behavior change. By taking everyday practices as the principal units of ...
A sustainable design fiction: Green practices
Special issue on practice-oriented approaches to sustainable HCIIn this article, we argue that an approach informed by practice theory coupled with design fiction provides useful insights into the role of interaction design with respect to environmental sustainability. We argue that a practice-oriented approach can ...
Toward an ecological sensibility: tools for evaluating sustainable HCI
CHI EA '10: CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe are developing evaluation tools that help sustainable HCI researchers to contribute to the overall project of achieving sustainability. In this paper we argue for the importance of broadening sustainable HCI evaluation beyond traditional HCI ...
Comments