ABSTRACT
Social networking sites (e.g. Facebook), microblogging services (e.g. Twitter), and content-sharing sites (e.g. YouTube and Flickr) have introduced the opportunity for wide-scale, online social participation. Visibility of national and international priorities such as public health, political unrest, disaster relief, and climate change has increased, yet we know little about the benefits - and possible costs - of engaging in social activism via social media. These powerful social issues introduce a need for scientific research into technology mediated social participation. What are the actual, tangible benefits of "greening" Twitter profile pictures in support of the Iranian elections? Does cartooning a Facebook profile picture really raise awareness of child abuse? Are there unintended negative effects through low-risk, low-cost technology-mediated participation? And, is there a difference - in both outcome and engagement level - between different types of online social activism? This SIG will investigate technology mediated social participation through a critical lens, discussing both the potential positive and negative outcomes of such participation. Approaches to designing for increased participation, evaluating effects of participation, and next steps in scientific research directions will be discussed.
- Batson, C. D., Ahmad, N. and Tsang, J. Four Motives for Community Involvement. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 3 (2002), 429--445.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bennett, W. New Media Power: The Internet and Global Activism. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, 2003.Google Scholar
- Fogg, B. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Ubiquity, 2002, (December 2002), 2. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gladwell, M. Small Change - Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted, New Yorker, October 4, 2010.Google Scholar
- Granovetter, M. The Strength of Weak Ties. American journal of sociology, 78, 6 (1973), 1360--1380.Google Scholar
- Pepitone, J. Text Donations Raise $7m for Red Cross Haiti Effort. CNNMoney, January 16, 2010.Google Scholar
- Pirolli, P., Preece, J. and Shneiderman, B. Cyberinfrastructure for Social Action on National Priorities. IEEE Computer, 43, 11 (2010), 20--21. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Slovic, P. Perception of Risk. Science, 236, 4799 (April 17, 1987), 280--285.Google Scholar
- Williams, J., Goose, S. and Wareham, M. Banning Landmines: Disarmament, Citizen Diplomacy, and Human Security. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD 2008.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- From slacktivism to activism: participatory culture in the age of social media
Recommendations
Exploring UK Millennials' Social Media Consumption Patterns and Participation in Elections, Activism, and źSlacktivismź
This study explores how UK young adults' exposure to social networking sites SNSs and attention to specific SNS content relate to their political practices. Data were collected from a diverse group of undergraduates during the 2015 General Election and ...
Health Slacktivism on Social Media: Predictors and Effects
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Social Computing and Social Media - Volume 8531The present study examined predictors, moderators, and effects of health slacktivism, which is characterized as individuals' effortless acts in supporting health causes primarily through Internet and social media. Findings revealed that issue-...
Prosocial media in action
Highlights- Analyses two events where social media played a vital role in helping behaviour.
AbstractOnline social media has been criticized by social psychologists as ineffective in providing significant social change to such a degree that the term ‘Slacktivism’ has been coined as a counter term to online ‘Activism.’ Yet, research to ...
Comments