ABSTRACT
Social computing has led to an explosion of research in understanding users, and it has the potential to similarly revolutionize systems research. However, the number of papers designing and building new sociotechnical systems has not kept pace. We analyze challenges facing social computing systems research, ranging from misaligned methodological incentives, evaluation expectations, double standards, and relevance compared to industry. We suggest improvements for the community to consider so that we can chart the future of our field.
- Ackerman, M. 1994. Augmenting the Organizational Memory: A Field Study of Answer Garden. In Proc. CSCW '94. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ackerman, M.S. 2000. The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction 15(2). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barkhuus, L., and Rode, J.A. 2007. From Mice to Men -- 24 years of evaluation in CHI. In Proc. alt.chi '07. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Beenen, G., Ling, K., Wang, X., et al. 2004. Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. In Proc. CSCW '04. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bernstein, M.S., Little, G., Miller, R.C., et al. Soylent: A Word Processor with a Crowd Inside. In Proc. UIST '10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bernstein, M.S., Suh, B., Hong, L., Chen, J., Kairam, S., and Chi, E.H. 2010. Eddi: Interactive topic-based browsing of social streams. In Proc. UIST 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bernstein, M.S., Tan, D., Smith, G., et al. 2010. Personalization via Friendsourcing. TOCHI 17(2). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brooks, F. 1996. The computer scientist as toolsmith II. Communications of the ACM 39(3). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brooks, F. 2010. The Design of Design. Addison Wesley: Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
- Chi, E.H. 2009. A position paper on 'Living Laboratories': rethinking ecological designs and experimentation in human-computer interaction. HCI International 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christensen, C.M. 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma. Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
- DiMicco, J., Millen, D.R., Geyer, W., et al. 2008. Motivations for social networking at work. In Proc. CSCW 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Erickson, T., and Kellogg, W. 2000. Social Translucence: An approach to designing systems that support social processes. TOCHI 7(1). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Greenberg, S., and Buxton, B. 2008. Evaluation considered harmful (some of the time). In Proc. CHI '08. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Grudin, J. 1989. Why groupware applications fail: problems in design and evaluation. Office: Technology and People 4(3): 187--211.Google Scholar
- Hoffmann, R., Amershi, S., Patel, K., et al. 2009. Amplifying community content creation with mixed initiative information extraction. In Proc. CHI '09. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ishii, H., and Kobayashi, M. 1992. ClearBoard: a seamless medium for shared drawing and conversation with eye contact. In Proc. CHI '92. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kaye, J., and Sengers, P. 2007. The evolution of evaluation. In Proc. alt.chi 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kriplean, T., Toomim, M., Morgan, J., et al. 2011. REFLECT: Supporting Active Listening and Grounding on the Web through Restatement. In Proc. CSCW '11 Horizon.Google Scholar
- Lampe, C. 2010. The machine in the ghost: a socio-technical approach to user-generated content research. WikiSym keynote. http://www.slideshare.net/clifflampe/the-machine-in-the-ghost-a-sociotechnical-perspectiveGoogle Scholar
- Landauer, T. 1995. The Trouble with Computers: usefulness, usability and productivity. MIT Press, Cambridge. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Landay, J.A. 2009. I give up on CHI/UIST. Blog. http://dubfuture.blogspot.com/2009/11/i-give-up-on-chiuist.html.Google Scholar
- Lieberman, H. 2003. Tyranny of Evaluation. CHI Fringe.Google Scholar
- Little, G., Chilton, L., Goldman, M., and Miller, R.C. TurKit: Human Computation Algorithms on Mechanical Turk. UIST '10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Markus, L., 1987. Towards a "critical mass" theory of interactive media: Universal access, interdependence, and diffusion. Communication Research 14: 491--511.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Morris, M. Personal communication. December 22, 2010.Google Scholar
- Olsen Jr., D. 2007. Evaluating User Interface Systems Research. In Proc. UIST '07. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., et al. 2009. Scratch: programming for all. Commun. ACM 52(11). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rittel, H.W.J. and Webber, M.M. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4:2, pp. 155--169.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roseman, M., and Greenberg, S. 1996. Building real-time groupware with GroupKit, a groupware toolkit. TOCHI 3(1). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ross, L., and Nisbett, R. 1991. The person and the situation. Temple University Press.Google Scholar
- Shamma, D., Kennedy, L., and Churchill, E. Tweetgeist: Can the twitter timeline reveal the structure of broadcast events? In CSCW 2010 Horizon.Google Scholar
- Suh, B., Chi, E.H., Kittur, A., and Pendleton, B.A. 2008. Lifting the veil: improving accountability and social transparency in Wikipedia with WikiDashboard. Proc. CHI '08. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Viegas, F., Wattenberg, M., van Ham, F., et al. 2007. ManyEyes: a Site for Visualization at Internet Scale. IEEE Trans. Viz. and Comp. Graph. Nov/Dec 2007: 1121--1128. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhai, S. 2003. Evaluation is the worst form of HCI research except all those other forms that have been tried. Essay published at CHI Place.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- The trouble with social computing systems research
Recommendations
Social Simulacra: Creating Populated Prototypes for Social Computing Systems
UIST '22: Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and TechnologySocial computing prototypes probe the social behaviors that may arise in an envisioned system design. This prototyping practice is currently limited to recruiting small groups of people. Unfortunately, many challenges do not arise until a system is ...
Social Computing: An Examination of Self, Social, and Use Factors
This article explores the influence of social, self, and use factors on the intention to perform social computing actions in online social sites. A survey was conducted using peer-to-peer file sharing as representative of a social computing action. ...
Towards an understanding of social inference opportunities in social computing
GROUP '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group WorkSocial computing applications are transforming the way we make new social ties, work, learn and play, thus becoming an essential part our social fabric. As a result, people and systems routinely make inferences about people's personal information based ...
Comments