Abstract
With dwindling nonrenewable energy reserves and the adverse effects of climate change, the development of the smart electricity grid is seen as key to solving global energy security issues and to reducing carbon emissions. In this respect, there is a growing need to integrate renewable (or green) energy sources in the grid. However, the intermittency of these energy sources requires that demand must also be made more responsive to changes in supply, and a number of smart grid technologies are being developed, such as high-capacity batteries and smart meters for the home, to enable consumers to be more responsive to conditions on the grid in real time. Traditional solutions based on these technologies, however, tend to ignore the fact that individual consumers will behave in such a way that best satisfies their own preferences to use or store energy (as opposed to that of the supplier or the grid operator). Hence, in practice, it is unclear how these solutions will cope with large numbers of consumers using their devices in this way. Against this background, in this article, we develop novel control mechanisms based on the use of autonomous agents to better incorporate consumer preferences in managing demand. These agents, residing on consumers' smart meters, can both communicate with the grid and optimize their owner's energy consumption to satisfy their preferences. More specifically, we provide a novel control mechanism that models and controls a system comprising of a green energy supplier operating within the grid and a number of individual homes (each possibly owning a storage device). This control mechanism is based on the concept of homeostasis whereby control signals are sent to individual components of a system, based on their continuous feedback, in order to change their state so that the system may reach a stable equilibrium. Thus, we define a new carbon-based pricing mechanism for this green energy supplier that takes advantage of carbon-intensity signals available on the Internet in order to provide real-time pricing. The pricing scheme is designed in such a way that it can be readily implemented using existing communication technologies and is easily understandable by consumers. Building upon this, we develop new control signals that the supplier can use to incentivize agents to shift demand (using their storage device) to times when green energy is available. Moreover, we show how these signals can be adapted according to changes in supply and to various degrees of penetration of storage in the system. We empirically evaluate our system and show that, when all homes are equipped with storage devices, the supplier can significantly reduce its reliance on other carbon-emitting power sources to cater for its own shortfalls. By so doing, the supplier reduces the carbon emission of the system by up to 25% while the consumer reduces its costs by up to 14.5%. Finally, we demonstrate that our homeostatic control mechanism is not sensitive to small prediction errors and the supplier is incentivized to accurately predict its green production to minimize costs.
- Alpaydin, E. 2004. Introduction to Machine Learning. The MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bathurst, G. N. and Strbac, G. 2003. Value of combining energy storage and wind in short-term energy and balancing markets. Electric Power Syst. Res. 67, 1, 1--8.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Burgio, A., Menniti, D., Pinnarelli, A., and Sorrentino, N. 2009. Reliability studies of a PV-WG hybrid system in presence of multi-micro storage systems. In Proceedings of PowerTech. 1--5.Google Scholar
- Bussmann, S., Jennings, N. R., and Wooldridge, M. J. 2004. Multi-Agent Systems for Manufacturing Control: A Design Methodology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Google ScholarDigital Library
- DECC. 2009a. Smarter grids: The opportunity. Tech. rep., Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), UK Government.Google Scholar
- DECC. 2009b. The UK low carbon transition plan: National strategy for climate and energy. Tech. rep., Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), UK Government.Google Scholar
- Faruqui, A. and George, S. 2005. Quantifying customer response to dynamic pricing. Electricity J. 18, 4, 53--63.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gajbhiye, R. and Soman, S. A. 2010. Facilitating emission trade within power exchange: Development of conceptual platform. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the European Energy Market. 1--6.Google Scholar
- Gerding, E. H., Robu, V., Stein, S., Parkes, D., Rogers, A., and Jennings, N. R. 2011. Online mechanism design for electric vehicle charging. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents And Multi-Agent Systems. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gomes, C. 2009. Computational sustainability: Computational methods for a sustainable environment, economy, and society. Bridge 39, 4, 5--13.Google Scholar
- Hammerstrom, D., Ambrosio, R., Carlon, T., DeSteese, J., Horst, G., Kajfasz, R., Kiesling, L., Michie, P., Pratt, R., Yao, M., et al. 2008. Pacific northwest gridwise testbed demonstration projects; Part I. Olympic Peninsula Project. Tech. rep., PNNL-17167, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA.Google Scholar
- Harris, C. 2005. Electricity Markets: Pricing, Structures, and Economics. Wiley.Google Scholar
- Hobbs, B. F., Bushnell, J., and Wolak, F. A. 2010. Is load-based carbon trading less costly than source-based trading? In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the European Energy Market. 1--6.Google Scholar
- Infield, D., Short, J., Home, C., and Freris, L. 2007. Potential for domestic dynamic demand-side management in the UK. In Proceedings of the Power Engineering Society General Meeting. 1--6.Google Scholar
- Jennings, N. R., Corera, J., Laresgoiti, I., Mamdani, E. H., Perriolat, F., Skarek, P., and Varga, L. Z. 1996. Using ARCHON to develop real-world DAI applications for electricity transportation management and particle accelerator control. IEEE Expert Syst. 11, 6, 60--88.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kirschen, D. and Strbac, G. 2004. Fundamentals of Power System Economics. Wiley.Google Scholar
- Kockar, I., Conejo, A. J., and McDonald, J. R. 2009. Influence of emissions trading scheme on market clearing and prices. In Proceedings of the Power Energy Society General Meeting. 1--5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kok, K. and Venekamp, G. 2010. Market-based control in decentralized power systems. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Agent Technology for Energy Systems.Google Scholar
- Korpaas, M., Holen, A. T., and Hildrum, R. 2003. Operation and sizing of energy storage for wind power plants in a market system. Int. J. Electrical Power Energy Syst. 25, 8, 599--606.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Li, H. and Tesfatsion, L. 2009. Development of open source software for power market research: The AMES test bed. J. Energy Markets 2, 2, 111--128.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Li, J., Poulton, G., and James, G. 2010. Coordination of distributed energy resource agents. J. Appl. Artifi. Intell. 24, 5, 351--380. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lubosny, Z. and Bialek, J. W. 2007. Supervisory control of a wind farm. IEEE Trans. Power Sys. 22, 3, 985--994.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Makarov, Y., Pengwei, D., Kintner-Meyer, M. C. W., Chunlian, J., and Illian, H. 2010. Optimal size of energy storage to accommodate high penetration of renewable resources in WECC system. In Proceedings of the Conference on Innovative Smart Grid Technologies. 1--5.Google Scholar
- Marieb, E. and Hoehn, K. 2007. Human Anatomy and Physiology. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Mazer, A. 2007. Electric Power Planning for Regulated and Deregulated Markets. Wiley-IEEE.Google Scholar
- Milligan, M., Porter, K., DeMeo, E., Denholm, P., Holttinen, H., Kirby, B., Miller, N., Mills, A., O'Malley, M., Schuerger, M., and Soder, L. 2009. Wind power myths debunked. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 7, 6, 89--99.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Morales, J., Conejo, A. J., and Perez-Ruiz, J. 2010. Short-Term trading for a wind power producer. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 25, 1, 554--564.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ramchurn, S., Vytelingum, P., Rogers, A., and Jennings, N. R. 2011. Agent-Based control for decentralised demand side management in the smart grid. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents And Multi-Agent Systems. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schweppe, F., Daryanian, B., and Tabors, R. 1989. Algorithms for a spot price responding residential load controller. IEEE Power Engin. Rev. 9, 5, 49--50.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schweppe, F., Tabors, R., Kirtley, J., Outhred, H., Pickel, F., and Cox, A. 1980. Homeostatic utility control. IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus Syst. 99, 3, 1151--1163.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Smith, K. 2010. Energy demand research project - Fifth progress report. Tech. rep., OFGEM, UK.Google Scholar
- Sun, J. and Tesfatsion, L. 2007. DC optimal power flow formulation and solution using QuadProgJ. In ISU Economics Working Paper no. 06014.Google Scholar
- US Department Of Energy. 2003. Grid 2030: A national vision For electricity's second 100 years. http://www.oe.energy.gov/DocumentsandMedia/Electric_Vision_Document.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Vytelingum, P., Voice, T. D., Ramchurn, S., Rogers, A., and Jennings, N. R. 2010. Agent-Based micro-storage management for the smart grid. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 39--46. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wong, S., Bhattacharya, K., and Fuller, J. 2010. Long-Term effects of feed-in tariffs and carbon taxes on distribution systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 25, 3, 1241--1253.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ygge, F., Akkermans, J. M., Andersson, A., Krejic, M., and Boertjes, E. 1999. The HOMEBOTS system and field test: A multi-commodity market for predictive power load management. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology. vol. 1. 363--382.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Agent-based homeostatic control for green energy in the smart grid
Recommendations
Agent-based control for decentralised demand side management in the smart grid
AAMAS '11: The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1Central to the vision of the smart grid is the deployment of smart meters that will allow autonomous software agents, representing the consumers, to optimise their use of devices and heating in the smart home while interacting with the grid. However, ...
Intelligent agents for the smart grid
AAMAS '10: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1The Intelligent Decentralised Energy-Aware Systems (iDEaS) project at the University of Southampton (see www.ideasproject.info) is developing and demonstrating the application of intelligent agents within the smart grid; a future vision of an ...
Optimal Power Management of Residential Customers in the Smart Grid
Recently intensive efforts have been made on the transformation of the world's largest physical system, the power grid, into a “smart grid” by incorporating extensive information and communication infrastructures. Key features in such a &#...
Comments