skip to main content
research-article

Agent-based homeostatic control for green energy in the smart grid

Published:15 July 2011Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

With dwindling nonrenewable energy reserves and the adverse effects of climate change, the development of the smart electricity grid is seen as key to solving global energy security issues and to reducing carbon emissions. In this respect, there is a growing need to integrate renewable (or green) energy sources in the grid. However, the intermittency of these energy sources requires that demand must also be made more responsive to changes in supply, and a number of smart grid technologies are being developed, such as high-capacity batteries and smart meters for the home, to enable consumers to be more responsive to conditions on the grid in real time. Traditional solutions based on these technologies, however, tend to ignore the fact that individual consumers will behave in such a way that best satisfies their own preferences to use or store energy (as opposed to that of the supplier or the grid operator). Hence, in practice, it is unclear how these solutions will cope with large numbers of consumers using their devices in this way. Against this background, in this article, we develop novel control mechanisms based on the use of autonomous agents to better incorporate consumer preferences in managing demand. These agents, residing on consumers' smart meters, can both communicate with the grid and optimize their owner's energy consumption to satisfy their preferences. More specifically, we provide a novel control mechanism that models and controls a system comprising of a green energy supplier operating within the grid and a number of individual homes (each possibly owning a storage device). This control mechanism is based on the concept of homeostasis whereby control signals are sent to individual components of a system, based on their continuous feedback, in order to change their state so that the system may reach a stable equilibrium. Thus, we define a new carbon-based pricing mechanism for this green energy supplier that takes advantage of carbon-intensity signals available on the Internet in order to provide real-time pricing. The pricing scheme is designed in such a way that it can be readily implemented using existing communication technologies and is easily understandable by consumers. Building upon this, we develop new control signals that the supplier can use to incentivize agents to shift demand (using their storage device) to times when green energy is available. Moreover, we show how these signals can be adapted according to changes in supply and to various degrees of penetration of storage in the system. We empirically evaluate our system and show that, when all homes are equipped with storage devices, the supplier can significantly reduce its reliance on other carbon-emitting power sources to cater for its own shortfalls. By so doing, the supplier reduces the carbon emission of the system by up to 25% while the consumer reduces its costs by up to 14.5%. Finally, we demonstrate that our homeostatic control mechanism is not sensitive to small prediction errors and the supplier is incentivized to accurately predict its green production to minimize costs.

References

  1. Alpaydin, E. 2004. Introduction to Machine Learning. The MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bathurst, G. N. and Strbac, G. 2003. Value of combining energy storage and wind in short-term energy and balancing markets. Electric Power Syst. Res. 67, 1, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Burgio, A., Menniti, D., Pinnarelli, A., and Sorrentino, N. 2009. Reliability studies of a PV-WG hybrid system in presence of multi-micro storage systems. In Proceedings of PowerTech. 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bussmann, S., Jennings, N. R., and Wooldridge, M. J. 2004. Multi-Agent Systems for Manufacturing Control: A Design Methodology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. DECC. 2009a. Smarter grids: The opportunity. Tech. rep., Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), UK Government.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. DECC. 2009b. The UK low carbon transition plan: National strategy for climate and energy. Tech. rep., Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), UK Government.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Faruqui, A. and George, S. 2005. Quantifying customer response to dynamic pricing. Electricity J. 18, 4, 53--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Gajbhiye, R. and Soman, S. A. 2010. Facilitating emission trade within power exchange: Development of conceptual platform. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the European Energy Market. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gerding, E. H., Robu, V., Stein, S., Parkes, D., Rogers, A., and Jennings, N. R. 2011. Online mechanism design for electric vehicle charging. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents And Multi-Agent Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gomes, C. 2009. Computational sustainability: Computational methods for a sustainable environment, economy, and society. Bridge 39, 4, 5--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hammerstrom, D., Ambrosio, R., Carlon, T., DeSteese, J., Horst, G., Kajfasz, R., Kiesling, L., Michie, P., Pratt, R., Yao, M., et al. 2008. Pacific northwest gridwise testbed demonstration projects; Part I. Olympic Peninsula Project. Tech. rep., PNNL-17167, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris, C. 2005. Electricity Markets: Pricing, Structures, and Economics. Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hobbs, B. F., Bushnell, J., and Wolak, F. A. 2010. Is load-based carbon trading less costly than source-based trading? In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the European Energy Market. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Infield, D., Short, J., Home, C., and Freris, L. 2007. Potential for domestic dynamic demand-side management in the UK. In Proceedings of the Power Engineering Society General Meeting. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jennings, N. R., Corera, J., Laresgoiti, I., Mamdani, E. H., Perriolat, F., Skarek, P., and Varga, L. Z. 1996. Using ARCHON to develop real-world DAI applications for electricity transportation management and particle accelerator control. IEEE Expert Syst. 11, 6, 60--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kirschen, D. and Strbac, G. 2004. Fundamentals of Power System Economics. Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kockar, I., Conejo, A. J., and McDonald, J. R. 2009. Influence of emissions trading scheme on market clearing and prices. In Proceedings of the Power Energy Society General Meeting. 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Kok, K. and Venekamp, G. 2010. Market-based control in decentralized power systems. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Agent Technology for Energy Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Korpaas, M., Holen, A. T., and Hildrum, R. 2003. Operation and sizing of energy storage for wind power plants in a market system. Int. J. Electrical Power Energy Syst. 25, 8, 599--606.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Li, H. and Tesfatsion, L. 2009. Development of open source software for power market research: The AMES test bed. J. Energy Markets 2, 2, 111--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Li, J., Poulton, G., and James, G. 2010. Coordination of distributed energy resource agents. J. Appl. Artifi. Intell. 24, 5, 351--380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lubosny, Z. and Bialek, J. W. 2007. Supervisory control of a wind farm. IEEE Trans. Power Sys. 22, 3, 985--994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Makarov, Y., Pengwei, D., Kintner-Meyer, M. C. W., Chunlian, J., and Illian, H. 2010. Optimal size of energy storage to accommodate high penetration of renewable resources in WECC system. In Proceedings of the Conference on Innovative Smart Grid Technologies. 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Marieb, E. and Hoehn, K. 2007. Human Anatomy and Physiology. Pearson Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Mazer, A. 2007. Electric Power Planning for Regulated and Deregulated Markets. Wiley-IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Milligan, M., Porter, K., DeMeo, E., Denholm, P., Holttinen, H., Kirby, B., Miller, N., Mills, A., O'Malley, M., Schuerger, M., and Soder, L. 2009. Wind power myths debunked. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 7, 6, 89--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Morales, J., Conejo, A. J., and Perez-Ruiz, J. 2010. Short-Term trading for a wind power producer. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 25, 1, 554--564.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Ramchurn, S., Vytelingum, P., Rogers, A., and Jennings, N. R. 2011. Agent-Based control for decentralised demand side management in the smart grid. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents And Multi-Agent Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Schweppe, F., Daryanian, B., and Tabors, R. 1989. Algorithms for a spot price responding residential load controller. IEEE Power Engin. Rev. 9, 5, 49--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Schweppe, F., Tabors, R., Kirtley, J., Outhred, H., Pickel, F., and Cox, A. 1980. Homeostatic utility control. IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus Syst. 99, 3, 1151--1163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Smith, K. 2010. Energy demand research project - Fifth progress report. Tech. rep., OFGEM, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Sun, J. and Tesfatsion, L. 2007. DC optimal power flow formulation and solution using QuadProgJ. In ISU Economics Working Paper no. 06014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. US Department Of Energy. 2003. Grid 2030: A national vision For electricity's second 100 years. http://www.oe.energy.gov/DocumentsandMedia/Electric_Vision_Document.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Vytelingum, P., Voice, T. D., Ramchurn, S., Rogers, A., and Jennings, N. R. 2010. Agent-Based micro-storage management for the smart grid. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 39--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Wong, S., Bhattacharya, K., and Fuller, J. 2010. Long-Term effects of feed-in tariffs and carbon taxes on distribution systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 25, 3, 1241--1253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Ygge, F., Akkermans, J. M., Andersson, A., Krejic, M., and Boertjes, E. 1999. The HOMEBOTS system and field test: A multi-commodity market for predictive power load management. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology. vol. 1. 363--382.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Agent-based homeostatic control for green energy in the smart grid

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
      ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology  Volume 2, Issue 4
      July 2011
      272 pages
      ISSN:2157-6904
      EISSN:2157-6912
      DOI:10.1145/1989734
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 July 2011
      • Accepted: 1 February 2011
      • Revised: 1 December 2010
      • Received: 1 October 2010
      Published in tist Volume 2, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader