skip to main content
10.1145/1991996.1992009acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmrConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploiting contextual spaces for image re-ranking and rank aggregation

Published:18 April 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

The objective of Content-based Image Retrieval (CBIR) systems is to return the most similar images given an image query. In this scenario, accurately ranking collection images is of great relevance. In general, CBIR systems consider only pairwise image analysis, that is, compute similarity measures considering only pair of images, ignoring the rich information encoded in the relations among several images. This paper presents a novel re-ranking approach based on contextual spaces aiming to improve the effectiveness of CBIR tasks, by exploring relations among images. In our approach, information encoded in both distances among images and ranked lists computed by CBIR systems are used for analyzing contextual information. The re-ranking method can also be applied to other tasks, such as: (i) for combining ranked lists obtained by using different image descriptors (rank aggregation); and (ii) for combining post-processing methods. We conducted several experiments involving shape, color, and texture descriptors and comparisons to other post-processing methods. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.

References

  1. N. Arica and F. T. Y. Vural. Bas: a perceptual shape descriptor based on the beam angle statistics. Pattern Recogn. Lett., 24(9--10):1627--1639, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. X. Bai, B. Wang, X. Wang, W. Liu, and Z. Tu. Co-transduction for shape retrieval. ECCV, 3:328--341, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Belongie, J. Malik, and J. Puzicha. Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. PAMI, 24(4):509--522, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. P. Brodatz. Textures: A Photographic Album for Artists and Designers. Dover, 1966.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. R. da S. Torres and A. X. Falcao. Contour Salience Descriptors for Effective Image Retrieval and Analysis. Image and Vision Computing, 25(1):3--13, January 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. F. F. Faria, A. Veloso, H. M. Almeida, E. Valle, R. da S. Torres, M. A. Goncalves, and W. M. Jr. Learning to rank for content-based image retrieval. In MIR '10, pages 285--294, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Huang, S. R. Kumar, M. Mitra, W.-J. Zhu, and R. Zabih. Image indexing using color correlograms. In CVPR '97, page 762, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Ji, K. Zhou, C. Liao, Z. Zheng, G.-R. Xue, O. Chapelle, G. Sun, and H. Zha. Global ranking by exploiting user clicks. In SIGIR '09, pages 35--42, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. B. H. Kontschieder Peter, Donoser Michael. Beyond pairwise shape similarity analysis. ACCV '09, pages 655--666, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. V. Kovalev and S. Volmer. Color co-occurence descriptors for querying-by-example. In MMM '98, page 32, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. L. J. Latecki, R. Lakmper, and U. Eckhardt. Shape descriptors for non-rigid shapes with a single closed contour. In CVPR, pages 424--429, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. H. Ling and D. W. Jacobs. Shape classification using the inner-distance. PAMI, 29(2):286--299, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. H. Ling, X. Yang, and L. J. Latecki. Balancing deformability and discriminability for shape matching. ECCV, 3:411--424, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Y.-T. Liu, T.-Y. Liu, T. Qin, Z.-M. Ma, and H. Li. Supervised rank aggregation. In WWW 2007, pages 481--490, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. T. Ojala, M. Pietikäinen, and T. Mäenpää. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. PAMI, 24(7):971--987, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. G. Park, Y. Baek, and H.-K. Lee. Re-ranking algorithm using post-retrieval clustering for content-based image retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 41(2):177--194, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. D. C. G. Pedronette and R. da S. Torres. Exploiting contextual information for image re-ranking. CIARP, pages 541--548, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. D. C. G. Pedronette and R. da S. Torres. Shape retrieval using contour features and distance optmization. In VISAPP, volume 1, pages 197--202, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. F. Perronnin, Y. Liu, and J.-M. Renders. A family of contextual measures of similarity between distributions with application to image retrieval. CVPR, pages 2358--2365, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. T. Qin, T.-Y. Liu, X.-D. Zhang, D.-S. Wang, and H. Li. Global ranking using continuous conditional random fields. In NIPS, pages 1281--1288, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. O. Schwander and F. Nielsen. Reranking with contextual dissimilarity measures from representational bregmanl k-means. In VISAPP, volume 1, pages 118--122, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. R. O. Stehling, M. A. Nascimento, and A. X. Falcao. A compact and efficient image retrieval approach based on border/interior pixel classification. In CIKM '02, pages 102--109, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. M. J. Swain and D. H. Ballard. Color indexing. IJCV, 7(1):11--32, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. B. Tao and B. W. Dickinson. Texture recognition and image retrieval using gradient indexing. JVCIR, 11(3):327--342, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. A. Temlyakov, B. C. Munsell, J. W. Waggoner, and S. Wang. Two perceptually motivated strategies for shape classification. CVPR, 1:2289--2296, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Z. Tu and A. L. Yuille. Shape matching and recognition - using generative models and informative features. ECCV, pages 195--209, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. J. van de Weijer and C. Schmid. Coloring local feature extraction. In ECCV, volume Part II, pages 334--348. Springer, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. X. Yang, X. Bai, L. J. Latecki, and Z. Tu. Improving shape retrieval by learning graph transduction. ECCV, 5305:788--801, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. X. Yang, S. Koknar-Tezel, and L. J. Latecki. Locally constrained diffusion process on locally densified distance spaces with applications to shape retrieval. In CVPR, pages 357--364, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Exploiting contextual spaces for image re-ranking and rank aggregation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICMR '11: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval
      April 2011
      512 pages
      ISBN:9781450303361
      DOI:10.1145/1991996

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 April 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate254of830submissions,31%

      Upcoming Conference

      ICMR '24
      International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval
      June 10 - 14, 2024
      Phuket , Thailand

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader