skip to main content
10.1145/2009916.2010004acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Learning relevance from heterogeneous social network and its application in online targeting

Published:24 July 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

The rise of social networking services in recent years presents new research challenges for matching users with interesting content. While the content-rich nature of these social networks offers many cues on "interests" of a user such as text in user-generated content, the links in the network, and user demographic information, there is a lack of successful methods for combining such heterogeneous data to model interest and relevance. This paper proposes a new method for modeling user interest from heterogeneous data sources with distinct but unknown importance. The model leverages links in the social graph by integrating the conceptual representation of a user's linked objects. The proposed method seeks a scalable relevance model of user interest, that can be discriminatively optimized for various relevance-centric problems, such as Internet advertisement selection, recommendation, and web search personalization. We apply our algorithm to the task of selecting relevant ads for users on Facebook's social network. We demonstrate that our algorithm can be scaled to work with historical data for all users, and learns interesting associations between concept classes automatically. We also show that using the learnt user model to predict the relevance of an ad is the single most important signal in our ranking system for new ads (with no historical clickthrough data), and overall leads to an improvement in the accuracy of the clickthrough rate prediction, a key problem in online advertising.

References

  1. Facebook Statistics, http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. The Open Directory Project (ODP), http://www.dmoz.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. E. Agichtein, E. Brill, and S. Dumais. Improving web search ranking by incorporating user behavior information. In SIGIR '06. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. H. Bao and E. Y. Chang. Adheat: an influence-based diffusion model for propagating hints to match ads. In WWW '10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:993--1022, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. Boyd and N. B. Ellison. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. Chakrabarti, D. Agarwal, and V. Josifovski. Contextual advertising by combining relevance with click feedback. In WWW '08. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. P. Chatterjee, D. L. Hoffman, and T. P. Novak. Modeling the clickstream: Implications for web-based advertising efforts. Marketing Science, 22, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Ciaramita, V. Murdock, and V. Plachouras. Online learning from click data for sponsored search. In WWW '08. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Daoud, L. Tamine, M. Boughanem, and B. Chebaro. Learning implicit user interests using ontology and search history for personalization. In WISE'07: Proceedings of the 2007 international conference on Web information systems engineering. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. Fensel, F. van Harmelen, I. Horrocks, D. L. McGuinness, and P. F. Patel-Schneider. Oil: An ontology infrastructure for the semantic web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. H. Friedman. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. D. Goldberg, D. Nichols, B. M. Oki, and D. Terry. Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Commun. ACM, 35, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Q. Gu, J. Zhou, and C. H. Q. Ding. Collaborative filtering: Weighted nonnegative matrix factorization incorporating user and item graphs. In SDM, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. G. King and L. Zeng. Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis, 9:137--163, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. I. Konstas, V. Stathopoulos, and J. M. Jose. On social networks and collaborative recommendation. In SIGIR '09. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Y. Ng. Feature selection, l1 vs. l2 regularization, and rotational invariance. In ICML '04: Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. B. Piwowarski and H. Zaragoza. Predictive user click models based on click-through history. In CIKM '07. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. F. Provost, B. Dalessandro, R. Hook, X. Zhang, and A. Murray. Audience selection for on-line brand advertising: privacy-friendly social network targeting. In KDD '09. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. B. Ribeiro-Neto, M. Cristo, P. B. Golgher, and E. Silva de Moura. Impedance coupling in content-targeted advertising. In SIGIR '05. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. A. Shepitsen, J. Gemmell, B. Mobasher, and R. Burke. Personalized recommendation in social tagging systems using hierarchical clustering. In RecSys '08. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. D. Vallet, M. Fernández, P. Castells, P. Mylonas, and Y. Avrithis. Personalized information retrieval in context. In 3rd International Workshop on Modeling and Retrieval of Context, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. C. Wang, P. Zhang, R. Choi, and M. D'Eredita. Understanding consumers attitude toward advertising. In Eighth Americas Conference on Information Systems, pages 1143--1148, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Z. Wen and C.-Y. Lin. On the quality of inferring interests from social neighbors. In KDD '10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. R. W. White, P. Bailey, and L. Chen. Predicting user interests from contextual information. In SIGIR '09. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Learning relevance from heterogeneous social network and its application in online targeting

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '11: Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval
      July 2011
      1374 pages
      ISBN:9781450307574
      DOI:10.1145/2009916

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 July 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader