skip to main content
10.1145/2024156.2024193acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagessiggraph-asiaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Adaptive sampling and reconstruction using greedy error minimization

Published:12 December 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

We introduce a novel approach for image space adaptive sampling and reconstruction in Monte Carlo rendering. We greedily minimize relative mean squared error (MSE) by iterating over two steps. First, given a current sample distribution, we optimize over a discrete set of filters at each pixel and select the filter that minimizes the pixel error. Next, given the current filter selection, we distribute additional samples to further reduce MSE. The success of our approach hinges on a robust technique to select suitable per pixel filters. We develop a novel filter selection procedure that robustly solves this problem even with noisy input data. We evaluate our approach using effects such as motion blur, depth of field, interreflections, etc. We provide a comparison to a state-of-the-art algorithm based on wavelet shrinkage and show that we achieve significant improvements in numerical error and visual image quality. Our approach is simple to implement, requires a single user parameter, and is compatible with standard Monte Carlo rendering.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Bala, K., Walter, B., and Greenberg, D. P. 2003. Combining edges and points for interactive high-quality rendering. ACM Trans. Graph. 22 (July), 631--640. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bolin, M. R., and Meyer, G. W. 1998. A perceptually based adaptive sampling algorithm. In SIGGRAPH '98, 299--309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chen, J., Wang, B., Wang, Y., Overbeck, R. S., Yong, J.-H., and Wang, W. 2011. Efficient depth-of-field rendering with adaptive sampling and multiscale reconstruction. Computer Graphics Forum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dammertz, H., Sewtz, D., Hanika, J., and Lensch, H. P. A. 2010. Edge-avoiding à-trous wavelet transform for fast global illumination filtering. In Proceedings of the Conference on High Performance Graphics, Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, Switzerland, HPG '10, 67--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Deussen, O., Hanrahan, P., Lintermann, B., Měch, R., Pharr, M., and Prusinkiewicz, P. 1998. Realistic modeling and rendering of plant ecosystems. In Proceedings of the 25th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM, New York, NY, USA, SIGGRAPH '98, 275--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Donoho, D. L., and Johnstone, J. M. 1994. Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika 81, 3, 425--455.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Egan, K., Tseng, Y.-T., Holzschuch, N., Durand, F., and Ramamoorthi, R. 2009. Frequency analysis and sheared reconstruction for rendering motion blur. ACM Trans. Graph. 28 (July), 93:1--93:13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Egan, K., Hecht, F., Durand, F., and Ramamoorthi, R. 2011. Frequency analysis and sheared filtering for shadow light fields of complex occluders. ACM Transactions on Graphics 30, 2 (Apr.), 9:1--9:13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Farrugia, J., and Péroche, B. 2004. A progressive rendering algorithm using an adaptive perceptually based image metric. In Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 23, Wiley Online Library, 605--614.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldenshluger, A., and Nemirovski, A. 1997. On spatial adaptive estimation of nonparametric regression. Math. Meth. Statistics 6, 135--170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hachisuka, T., Jarosz, W., Weistroffer, R. P., Dale, K., Humphreys, G., Zwicker, M., and Jensen, H. W. 2008. Multidimensional adaptive sampling and reconstruction for ray tracing. ACM Trans. Graph. 27 (August), 33:1--33:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Katkovnik, V. 1999. A new method for varying adaptive bandwidth selection. Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on 47, 9, 2567--2571. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kollig, T., and Keller, A. 2002. Efficient multidimensional sampling. Computer Graphics Forum 21, 3, 557--563.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Lee, J.-S. 1980. Digital image enhancement and noise filtering by use of local statistics. IEEE Trans. PAMI 2, 2 (march), 165--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lehtinen, J., Aila, T., Chen, J., Laine, S., and Durand, F. 2011. Temporal light field reconstruction for rendering distribution effects. ACM Trans. Graph. 30 (August), 55:1--55:12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lepski, O. V., Mammen, E., and Spokoiny, V. G. 1997. Optimal spatial adaptation to inhomogeneous smoothness: An approach based on kernel estimates with variable bandwidth selectors. The Annals of Statistics 25, 3, pp. 929--947.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Mitchell, D. P. 1987. Generating antialiased images at low sampling densities. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 21 (August), 65--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Overbeck, R. S., Donner, C., and Ramamoorthi, R. 2009. Adaptive wavelet rendering. ACM Trans. Graph. 28 (December), 140:1--140:12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Pharr, M., and Humphreys, G. 2010. Physically Based Rendering, Second Edition: From Theory To Implementation, 2nd ed. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Portilla, J., Strela, V., Wainwright, M., and Simoncelli, E. 2003. Image denoising using scale mixtures of gaussians in the wavelet domain. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on 12, 11, 1338--1351. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ritschel, T., Engelhardt, T., Grosch, T., Seidel, H.-P., Kautz, J., and Dachsbacher, C. 2009. Micro-rendering for scalable, parallel final gathering. ACM Trans. Graph. 28 (December), 132:1--132:8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Shirley, P., Aila, T., Cohen, J., Enderton, E., Laine, S., Luebke, D., and McGuire, M. 2011. A local image reconstruction algorithm for stochastic rendering. In Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games, ACM, New York, NY, USA, I3D '11, 9--14 PAGE@5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Silverman, B. 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis, vol. 26. Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Soler, C., Subr, K., Durand, F., Holzschuch, N., and Sillion, F. 2009. Fourier depth of field. ACM Trans. Graph. 28 (May), 18:1--18:12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Adaptive sampling and reconstruction using greedy error minimization

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SA '11: Proceedings of the 2011 SIGGRAPH Asia Conference
      December 2011
      730 pages
      ISBN:9781450308076
      DOI:10.1145/2024156

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 December 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate178of869submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader