skip to main content
10.1145/2024288.2024344acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesi-knowConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A visual analytics approach to dynamic social networks

Published:07 September 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

The visualization and analysis of dynamic networks have become increasingly important in several fields, for instance sociology or economics. The dynamic and multi-relational nature of this data poses the challenge of understanding both its topological structure and how it changes over time. In this paper we propose a visual analytics approach for analyzing dynamic networks that integrates: a dynamic layout with user-controlled trade-off between stability and consistency; three temporal views based on different combinations of node-link diagrams (layer superimposition, layer juxtaposition, and two-and-a-half-dimensional view); the visualization of social network analysis metrics; and specific interaction techniques for tracking node trajectories and node connectivity over time. This integration of visual, interactive, and automatic methods supports the multi-faceted analysis of dynamically changing networks.

References

  1. Andrews, K., Wohlfahrt, M., and Wurzinger, G. 2009. Visual graph comparison. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Information Visualization (Barcelona, 15--17 July 2009). IV'09. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 62--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Barnes, J. and Hut, P. 1986. A hierarchical O(n Log n) force calculation algorithm. Nature. 324(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bender-deMoll, S. and McFarland, D. A. 2006. The art and science of dynamic network visualization. Journal of Social Structure. 7 (2), 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertin, J. and Daru, M. 2001. Matrix theory of graphics. Information Design Journal. 10 (1), 5--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Biedl, T., Lubiw, A., and Spriggs, M. J. 2005. Morphing planar graphs while preserving edge directions. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Graph Drawing (Limerick, Ireland, September 2005). GD'05. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 13--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Brandes, U. and Corman, S. R. 2003. Visual unrolling of the network evolution and the analysis of dynamic discourse. Information Visualization. 2 (1), 40--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Brandes, U. and Wagner, D. 1997. A Bayesian paradigm for dynamic graph layout. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Graph Drawing (Rome, Italy, September 1997). GD'97. Springer, London, UK, 236--247. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Branke, J. 2001. Dynamic graph drawing. Springer Lecture Notes In Computer Science. 2025, 228--246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Bridgeman, S. and Tamassia, R. 2002. A user study in similarity measures for graph drawing, Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications. 6 (3), 225--254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Carley, K. M. 2003. Dynamic networks analysis. In Summary of the NRC workshop on Social Network Modeling and Analysis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, C. 2005. Top 10 unsolved information visualization problems. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 25 (4), 12--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Coleman, M. K. 1993. Aesthetics-based graph layout for human consumption, Master Thesis, University of California Los Angeles, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Correa, C. D. and Ma, K.-L. 2011. Visualizing social networks. In Social Network Data Analytics. C. Aggarwal Ed., Springer, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Di Battista, G., Eades, P., Tamassia, R., and Tollis, I. G. 1994. Algorithms for drawing graphs: an annotated bibliography. Computational Geometry: Theory and Application. 4 (5), 235--282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Diehl, S., Görg, C., and Kerren, A. 2001. Preserving the mental map using foresighted layout. In Proceedings of Joint Eurographics - IEEE TCVG Symposium on Visualization (Ascona, Switzerland, May 2001). VisSym'01. Springer Verlag, Vienna, Austria, 175--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Dwyer, T. and Gallagher, D. R. 2004. Visualising changes in fund manager holdings in two and a half-dimensions. Information Visualization. 3 (4), 227--244. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Eades, P. and Lai, W. 1991. Preserving the mental map of a diagram. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Computational Graphics and Visualization Techniques (Sesimbra, Portugal, September 1991). COMPUGRAPHICS '91. Elsevier, 24--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Erten, C., Harding, P. J., Kobourov, S. G., Wampler, K., and Yee, G. 2004. GraphAEL: graph animations with evolving layouts. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2912, 98--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Erten, C., Kobourov, S. G., and Pitta, C. 2003. Intersection-free morphing of planar graphs. In Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Graph Drawing (Perugia, Italy, September 2003). GD'03. Springer-Verlag, London, UK, 320--331.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Freeman, L. C. 2000. Visualizing social networks. Journal of Social Structure. 1 (1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Freire M., Plaisant C., Shneiderman B., and Golbeck J. 2010. ManyNets: an interface for multiple network analysis and visualization. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI'10. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 213--222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Friederich, C. and Houle, M. E. 2001. Graph drawing in motion II. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Graph Drawing (Vienna, Austria, September 2010). GD'01. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 220--231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Frishman, Y. and Tal, A. 2004. Dynamic drawing of clustered graphs. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (October 2004). InfoVis'04. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 191--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Fruchterman, T. M. J. and Reingold, E. M. 1991. Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software - Practice & Experience. 21 (11), 1129--1164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Ghoniem, M., Fakete, J.-D., and Castagliola, P. 2004. A comparison of the readability of graphs using node-link diagrams and matrix-based representation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (October 2004). InfoVis'04. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Groh G., Hanstein H., and Wörnld W. 2009. Interactively visualizing dynamic social networks with dyson. In Proc. of the IUI'09 Workshop on Visual Interfaces to the Social and the Semantic Web. ACM, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Heer, J., Card, S. K., and Landay, J. A. 2005. Prefuse: a toolkit for interactive information visualization. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI '05. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 421--430. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Herman, I., Melançon, G., and Scott Marshall, M. 2000. Graph visualization and navigation in information visualization: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 6 (1), 24--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Kamada, T. and Kawai, S.. 1989. An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters. 31 (1), 7--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Kumar, G. and Garland, M. 2006. Visual exploration of complex time-varying graphs, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 12 (5). Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 805--812. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Lee, Y.-Y., Lin, C.-C., and Yen, H.-C. 2006. Mental map preserving graph drawing using simulated annealing. In Proceedings of the 2006 Asia-Pacific Symposium on Information Visualisation, (2006). Australian Computer Society, Darlinghurst, Australia. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Loubier, E. and Dousset, B. 2008. Temporal and relational data representation by graph morphing. In Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference (Valencia, Spain, September 2008). ESREL'08. Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. McGrath, C. J. and Blythe, J. 2004. Do you see what I want you to see? The effects of motion and spatial layout on viewers' perceptions of graph structure. Journal of Social Structure. 5 (2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Misue, K., Eades, P., Lai., W., and Sugiyama, K. 1995. Layout adjustment and the mental map. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing. 6 (2), 183--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Moody, J., McFarland, D., and Bender-deMoll, S. 2005. Dynamic network visu1ization. American Journal of Sociology. 110 (4), 1206--1241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Moreno, J. L. 1934. Who shall survive? A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Nervous and Mental Disease Monograph Series, 58, 22--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. North, S. C. 1996. Incremental layout in DynaDAG. Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences. 1027, 409--418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Perer, A. and Shneiderman, B. 2008. Integrating statistics and visualization: case studies of gaining clarity during exploratory data analysis. In Proceedings of 26th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 265--274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Pohl, M., Reitz, F., and Birke, P. 2008. As time goes by: integrated visualization and analysis of dynamic networks. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 372--375. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Purchase H. C., Hoggan E., and Görg, C. 2006. How important is the "mental map"? An empirical investigation of a dynamic graph layout algorithm. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Graph Drawing. GD'06. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 184--195. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Saffrey, P. and Purchase, H. C. 2008. The "mental map" versus "static aesthetic" compromise in dynamic graphs: a user study. In Proceedings of the 9th Australasian Conference on User Interface. Australian Computer Society Inc., Darlinghurst, Australia, 85--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Sarodnick, F. and Brau, H. 2006. Methoden der Usability Evaluation. Hans Huber, Bern, CH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Tominski, C., Abello, J., and Schumann, H. 2009. CGV-An interactive graph visualization system. Computer Graphics. 33, 6 (December 2009), 660--678. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Tufte, E. R. 1983. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Yang, X., Asur, S., Parthasarathy, S., and Mehta, S. 2008. A visual-analytic toolkit for dynamic interaction graphs. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowldege Discovery and Data Mining. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 1016--1024. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A visual analytics approach to dynamic social networks

      Recommendations

      Reviews

      George Popescu

      This paper explores visualization techniques for understanding the dynamics of social networks. Its main contribution is represented by integrating interactive visualization techniques with payout algorithms and metrics. The paper highlights distinguishable solutions from previous work. Its strong points include a solid problem formation, a presentation of complex visualization issues, and strong argumentation for the design choice, particularly the views. Figures complement the text to justify the concepts--for instance, the juxtaposition of views in a dynamic network. The paper offers a clear and comprehensive understanding of the visualization method. Online Computing Reviews Service

      Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

      Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        i-KNOW '11: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies
        September 2011
        306 pages
        ISBN:9781450307321
        DOI:10.1145/2024288

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 September 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate77of238submissions,32%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader