skip to main content
10.1145/2030112.2030135acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Getting closer: an empirical investigation of the proximity of user to their smart phones

Published:17 September 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Much research in ubiquitous computing assumes that a user's phone will be always on and at-hand, for collecting user context and for communicating with a user. Previous work with the previous generation of mobile phones has shown that such an assumption is false. Here, we investigate whether this assumption about users' proximity to their mobile phones holds for a new generation of mobile phones, smart phones. We conduct a data collection field study of 28 smart phone owners over a period of 4 weeks. We show that in fact this assumption is still false, with the within arm's reach proximity being true close to 50% of the time, similar to the earlier work. However, we also show that smart phone proximity within the same room (arm+room) as the user is true almost 90% of the time. We discuss the reasons for these phone proximities and the implications of this on the development of mobile phone applications, particularly those that collect user and environmental context, and delivering notification to users. We also show that we can accurately predict the proximity at the arm level and arm+room level with 75 and 83% accuracy, respectively, with features simple to collect and model on a mobile phone. Further we show that for several individuals who are almost always within the arm+room level, we can predict this level with over 90% accuracy.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

4-4.mov

mov

45.2 MB

References

  1. Banjo, O., Hu, Y. and Sundar, S.S. Cell phone usage and social interaction with proximate others: Ringing in theoretical model. The Open Communication Journal, 2, 2008: 127--135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Brandt, J., Weiss, N., and Klemmer, S. R. Lowering the burden for diary studies under mobile conditions. CHI '07 extended abstracts. 2007. 2303--2308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Consolvo, S., et al. Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of ubifit garden. CHI '08. 2008. 1797--1806. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cozza, R. Forecast: Mobile Communications Devices by Open Operating System, Worldwide. Gartner Report. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Cozza, R., et al. A. Market Share Analysis: Mobile Devices, Worldwide, 4Q10 and 2010. Gartner Report. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Eagle, N. and Pentland, A.S. Reality mining: sensing complex social systems. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 10 (March 2006): 255--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Entner, R. Smartphones to Overtake Feature Phones in U.S. by 2011, Nielsen Wire, http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/smartphones-to-overtake-feature-phones-in-u-s-by-2011/, March 26, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Garzonis, S. Mobile Service Awareness Via Auditory Notifications. Doctoral thesis, University of Bath, June 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Györb'1ró, N., Fábián, Á. and Hományi, G. An activity recognition system for mobile phones. Mobile Networks and Applications, 14 (February 2009): 82--91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hall, M., et al. The WEKA Data Mining Software: An Update. SIGKDD Explorations, 11(1), 2009: 10--1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Helal, S., et al. Smart phone based cognitive assistant. UbiHealth 2003, Workshop on Ubiquitous Computing for Pervasive Healthcare Applications. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Henderson-Summet, V. Facilitating Communication for Deaf Individuals with Mobile Technologies. Doctoral thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kahneman, D., et al. A Survey Method for Characterizing Daily Life Experience: The Day Reconstruction Method. Science, 306 (December 2004): 1776--1780.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kellogg, D. Among Mobile Phone Ussrs, Hispanics, Asians are Most-Likely Smartphone Owners in the U.S. Nielsen Wire, http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/among-mobile-phone-users-hispanics-asians-are-most-likely-smartphone-owners-in-the-u-s, February 2, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Krause, A., Smailagic, A., Siewiorek, D.P. Context-Aware Mobile Computing: Learning Context-Dependent Personal Preferences from Wearable Sensor Array. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 5(2) Feb. 2006 pp. 113--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Krumm, J. Ubiquitous Advertising: The Killer Application for the 21st Century. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 10 (January 2011): 66--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Laasonen, K. Clustering and prediction of mobile user routes from cellular data, 2005. Knowledge Discovery in Databases. 2005. 569--576. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Massimi, M., Baecker, R.M., and Wu, M. Using participatory activities with seniors to critique, build, and evaluate mobile phones. ASSETS 2007. 2007, 155--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Partridge, K. and Golle, P. On using existing time-use study data for ubiquitous computing applications. In UbiComp'08, 2008, 144--153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Patel, S.N., et al. Farther Than You May Think: An Empirical Investigation of the Proximity of Users to Their Mobile Phones. UbiComp '06. 2006, 123--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Preuveneers, D. and Berbers, Y. Mobile phones assisting with health self-care: a diabetes case study. MobileHCI '08. 2008, 177--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Satyanarayanan, M. Swiss army knife or wallet? IEEE Pervasive 4(2), Jan.-Mar., 2005, 2--3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Varshavsky, A. and Patel, S. Location in Ubiquitous Computing. In Krumm, J. (ed.), Ubiquitous Computing Fundamentals, Taylor and Francis Group, Florida, (2010) Chapter 8, 285--319.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Getting closer: an empirical investigation of the proximity of user to their smart phones

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '11: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Ubiquitous computing
      September 2011
      668 pages
      ISBN:9781450306300
      DOI:10.1145/2030112

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 September 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader