Daniele Quercia
Jon Crowcroft
ABSTRACT
We study the relationship between Facebook popularity (number of contacts) and personality traits on a large number of subjects. We test to which extent two prevalent viewpoints hold. That is, popular users (those with many social contacts) are the ones whose personality traits either predict many offline (real world) friends or predict propensity to maintain superficial relationships. We find that the predictor for number of friends in the real world (Extraversion) is also a predictor for number of Facebook contacts. We then test whether people who have many social contacts on Facebook are the ones who are able to adapt themselves to new forms of communication, present themselves in likable ways, and have propensity to maintain superficial relationships. We show that there is no statistical evidence to support such a conjecture.
- R. Algesheimer, U. Dholakia, and A. Herrmann. The Social Influence of Brand Community: Evidence from European Car Clubs. Journal of Marketing, 69, July 2005.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- C. Anderson, O. John, D. Keltner, and A. Kring. Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, July 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. S. Berry, J. K. Willingham, and C. A. Thayer. Affect and personality as predictors of conflict and closeness in young adults' friendships. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, March 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Bowling, T. Beehr, and W. Swader. Giving and receiving social support at work: the roles of personality and reciprocity. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 67, December 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Buchanan and J. Smith. Using the Internet for psychological research: Personality testing on the World Wide Web. British Journal of Psychology, 90, March 2002.Google Scholar
- M. Burke, R. Kraut, and C. Marlow. Social Capital on Facebook: Differentiating Uses and Users. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), May 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Burke, C. Marlow, and T. Lento. Social Network Activity and Social Well-Being. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), April 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. T. Cacioppo and W. Patrick. Loneliness: Human Nature and the Need for Social Connection. W. W. Norton & Company, 2008.Google Scholar
- C. M. Cheng and T. Chartrand. Self-Monitoring Without Awareness: Using Mimicry as a Nonconscious Affiliation Strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, December 2003.Google Scholar
- P. Costa and R. Mccrae. The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). SAGE Publications, 2005.Google Scholar
- D. Crandall, L. Backstrom, D. Cosley, S. Suri, D. Huttenlocher, and J. Kleinberg. Inferring social ties from geographic coincidences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, December 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Dehle and J. Landers. You can't always get what you want, but can you get what you need? Personality traits and social support in marriage. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, November 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. S. Dodds, R. Muhamad, and D. J. Watts. An Experimental Study of Search in Global Social Networks. Science, 301:827--829, August 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. Duan, Z. Chen, Z. Liu, and W. Jin. Efficient target strategies for contagion in scale-free networks. Physical Review E, 72:026133, August 2005.Google Scholar
- R. Dunbar. Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 1993.Google Scholar
- N. Ellison, C. Steinfield, and C. Lampe. The benefits of Facebook "friends": Exploring the relationship between college students' use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, July 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. Gibson. Burning Chrome. Ace Books, 1987.Google Scholar
- T. B. Gogolinski. Effects Of Self-Monitoring and Public Self-Consciousness on Perceptions of Facebook Profiles. Colonial Academic Alliance Undergraduate Research Journal, 1, 2010.Google Scholar
- J. Golbeck, C. Robles, and K. Turner. Predicting personality with social media. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), May 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Goldberg, J. Johnson, H. Eber, R. Hogan, M. Ashton, R. Cloninger, and H. Gough. The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, February 2006.Google Scholar
- S. Gosling and S. Vazire. Personality impressions based on facebook profiles. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), March 2007.Google Scholar
- S. Gosling, S. Vazire, S. Srivastava, and O. John. Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, February 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Hargittai. Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 2008.Google Scholar
- S. Henderson. Neurosis and the social environment. New York: Academic Press, 1981.Google Scholar
- J. Henrich, S. Heine, and A. Norenzayan. The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, June 2010.Google Scholar
- B. Hogan. The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online. Bulletin of Science Technology Society, December 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Jagatic, N. Johnson, A. Nathaniel, M. Jakobsson, and F. Menczer. Social phishing. Communications of the ACM, 50, October 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Jensen-Campbell and W. Graziano. Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 71, January 2004.Google Scholar
- O. P. John and S. Srivastava. The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. Guilford Press, 1999.Google Scholar
- G. D. Jong, E. V. Sonderen, and P. Emmelkamp. A comprehensive model of stress: the roles of experience stress and Neuroticism in explaining the stress-distress relationship. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 68, 1999.Google Scholar
- B. R. Karney and T. N. Bradbury. The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: a review of theory, methods and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, July 1995.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. A. Kleck, C. A. Reese, D. Z. Behnken, and S. S. Sundar. The company you keep and the image you project: Putting your best face forward in online social networks. In Proceedings of the International Communication Association, May 2007.Google Scholar
- A. Kramer, D. Adam, and K. Rodden. Word usage and posting behaviors: modeling blogs with unobtrusive data collection methods. In Proceeding of the 26th Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), April 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Lanier. You Are Not a Gadget: A Manifesto. Knopf, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Lee-Baggley, M. Preece, and A. DeLongis. Coping with interpersonal stress: role of Big Five traits. Journal of Personality, 73, July 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Lewis and A. West. 'Friending': London-based undergraduates' experience of Facebook. New media and Society, 11, September 2009.Google Scholar
- C. S. Lin. Exploring the Personality Trait of Self-Monitoring on Technology Usage of Web Portals. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 11, April 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Lu and M. Argyle. Receiving and giving support: effects on relationships and well-being. Psychology Quarterly, 5, April 1992.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. McCrae and P. Costa. Personality, coping, and coping effectiveness in an adult sample. Journal of Personality, 54, 1986.Google Scholar
- A. Mehra, M. Kilduff, and D. Brass. The Social Networks of High and Low Self-monitors: Implications for Workplace Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 11, March 2000.Google Scholar
- D. Nettle. Personality: What Makes You the Way You Are. Oxford University Press, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. D. Nyea, B. W. Robertsa, G. Saucierb, and X. Zhouc. Testing the measurement equivalence of personality adjective items across cultures. Journal of Research in Personality, July 2008.Google Scholar
- T. B. O'Brien and A. DeLongis. The interactional context of problem-, emotion-, and relationship-focused coping: the role of the Big Five personality factors. Journal of Personality, 64, December 1996.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Parks. Personal networks and personal relationships. Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
- D. Quercia, M. Kosinski, D. Stillwell, and J. Crowcroft. Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), October 2011.Google Scholar
- U. Reips. The Web Experiment Method: Advantages, disadvantages, and solutions. CA Academic Press, 2000.Google Scholar
- D. Russell, B. Booth, D. Reed, and P. Laughlin. Personality, social networks, and perceived social support among alcoholics: a structural equation analysis. Journal of Personality, 65, September 1997.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Shirky. Here Comes Everybody. Allen Lane, 2008.Google Scholar
- M. Snyder. Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 30, 1974.Google Scholar
- R. Swickert. Personality and social support processes. The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Swickert, C. Rosentreter, J. Hittner, and J. Mushrush. Extraversion, social support processes, and stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, April 2002.Google Scholar
- S. T. Tong, B. V. D. Heide, L. Langwell, and J. B. Walther. Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, April 2008.Google Scholar
- J. Y. Tsai, P. Kelley, P. Drielsma, L. F. Cranor, J. Hong, and N. Sadeh. Who's viewed you?: the impact of feedback in a mobile location-sharing application. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Vazire and S. Gosling. e-Perceptions: Personality Impressions Based on Personal Websites. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, July 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- The personality of popular facebook users
Recommendations
Personality and patterns of Facebook usage
WebSci '12: Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science ConferenceWe show how users' activity on Facebook relates to their personality, as measured by the standard Five Factor Model. Our dataset consists of the personality profiles and Facebook profile data of 180,000 users. We examine correlations between users' ...
Predicting personality with social media
CHI EA '11: CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsSocial media is a place where users present themselves to the world, revealing personal details and insights into their lives. We are beginning to understand how some of this information can be utilized to improve the users' experiences with interfaces ...
Personality and social characteristics of Facebook non-users and frequent users
Facebook is currently the largest social networking website with an estimated one billion of monthly active users in 2012. While most of the prior research has explored characteristics of Facebook users, less is known about the characteristics of ...
Comments