skip to main content
10.1145/2157689.2157804acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Personalization in HRI: a longitudinal field experiment

Published:05 March 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Creating and sustaining rapport between robots and people is critical for successful robotic services. As a first step towards this goal, we explored a personalization strategy with a snack delivery robot. We designed a social robotic snack delivery service, and, for half of the participants, personalized the service based on participants' service usage and interactions with the robot. The service ran for each participant for two months. We evaluated this strategy during a 4-month field experiment. The results show that, as compared with the social service alone, adding personalized service improved rapport, cooperation, and engagement with the robot during service encounters.

References

  1. Aaker, J., Fournier, S., & Brasel, A. (2004). When good brands do bad. Journal of Consumer research, 31, 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bickmore, T. & Picard, R. (2005). Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships. Transactions on Computer Human Interaction, 59(1), 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dautenhahn, K. (2004). Robots we like to live with: A developmental perspective on a personalized, life-long robot companion. Proc. of ROMAN'04, 17--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Gockley, R., Bruce, A., Forlizzi, J., Michalowski, M., Mundell, A., Rosenthal, S., Sellner, B., Simmons, R., Snipes, K., Schultz, A. C., & Wang, J. (2005). Designing robots for long-term social interaction. Proc. of IROS'05, 2199--2204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., & Powers, A. (2003). Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. Proc. of ROMAN'03, 55--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Gwinner, K. P., Gremier, D. D., & Bitner, M. J. (1998). Relational benefits in services industries: The customer's perspective. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 26(2), 101--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hada, Y., Gakuhari, H., Takase, K., & Hemeldan, E. I. (2004). Delivery service robot using distributed acquisition, actuators and intelligence. Proc. of IROS'04, 2997--3002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Kidd, C. D., & Breazeal, C. (2008). Robots at home: Understanding long-term human-robot interaction. Proc. of IROS'08, 3230--3235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Knapp, M. L, & Hall, J. A. (2009). Nonverbal communication in human interaction. Cengage Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee, M. K., & Forlizzi, J. (2009). Designing adaptive robotic services. Proc. of IASDR'09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, M. K., Forlizzi, J., Rybski, P. E., Crabbe, F., Chung, W., Finkle, J., Glaser, E., & Kiesler, S. (2009). The Snackbot: Documenting the design of a robot for long-term Human-Robot Interaction. Proc. of HRI'09, 7--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lee, M. K., Kiesler, S., & Forlizzi, J. (2011). Mining behavioral economics to design persuasive technology for healthy choices. Proc. of CHI'11, 325--334. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lee, M. K., Kiesler, S., Forlizzi, J., Srinivasa, S., & Rybski, P. (2010). Gracefully mitigating breakdowns in robotic services. Proc. of HRI'10, 203--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Mason, M., & Lopes, M. (2011). Robot self-initiative and personalization by learning through repeated interactions. Proc. of HRI'11, 433--440. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mehrabian, A. (1970). A semantic space for nonverbal behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35(2), 248--257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Roundtree, R. I., & Bitner, M. J. (2000). Self-service technologies: Understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 50--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Nakauchi, Y., & Simmons, R. (2002). A social robot that stands in line. Autonomous Robots, 12, 313--324. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Pfeifer, L. M. & Bickmore, T. (2011). Is the media equation a flash in the pan? The durability and longevity of social responses to computers. Proc. of CHI'10, 777--780. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Rosenthal, S., Veloso, M., & Dey, A. K. Is someone in this office available to help me? Proactively seeking help from spatially-situated humans. To appear in Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Surprenant, C. F., & Solomon, M. R. (1987). Predictability and personalization in the service encounter. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 86--96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Venolia, G., Tang, J., Cervantes, R., Bly, S., Robertson, G. G., Lee, B. & Inkpen, K. (2010). Embodied Social Proxy. Proc. of CHI'10, 1049--105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Personalization in HRI: a longitudinal field experiment

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '12: Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction
      March 2012
      518 pages
      ISBN:9781450310635
      DOI:10.1145/2157689

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 March 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader