Jenay M. Beer
ABSTRACT
Many older adults wish to remain in their own homes as they age [16]. However, challenges in performing home upkeep tasks threaten an older adult's ability to age in place. Even healthy independently living older adults experience challenges in maintaining their home [13]. Challenges with home tasks can be compensated through technology, such as home robots. However, for home robots to be adopted by older adult users, they must be designed to meet older adults' needs for assistance and the older users must be amenable to robot assistance for those needs. We conducted a needs assessment to (1) assess older adults' openness to assistance from robots; and (2) understand older adults' opinions about using an assistive robot to help around the home. We administered questionnaires and conducted structured group interviews with 21 independently living older adults (ages 65-93). The questionnaire data suggest that older adults prefer robot assistance for cleaning and fetching/organizing tasks overall. However their assistance preferences discriminated between tasks. The interview data provided insight as to why they hold such preferences. Older adults reported benefits of robot assistance (e.g., the robot compensating for limitations, saving them time and effort, completing undesirable tasks, and performing tasks at a high level of performance). Participants also reported concerns such as the robot damaging the environment, being unreliable at or incapable of doing a task, doing tasks the older adult would rather do, or taking up too much space/storage. These data, along with specific comments from participant interviews, provide the basis for preliminary recommendations for designing mobile manipulator robots to support aging in place.
- AARP. (2005, April). Beyond 50.05 survey. Retrieved February 13, 2009, from http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/il/beyond_50_05_survey.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Baltes, P. B., and Baltes, M. M. 1990. Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. Baltes and M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the Behavioral Sciences, 1--34. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., and MacDonald, B. 2009. Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions. International Journal of Social Robotics,1, 4 (2009), 319--330. DOI = http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12369-009-0030--6.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Broadbent, E., Tamagawa, R., Patience, A., Knock, B., Kerse, N., Day, K., and MacDonald, B. A. 2011. Attitudes towards health-care robots in a retirement village. Australas. J. Ageing. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741--6612.2011.00551.x.Google Scholar
- Bugmann, G., and Copleston, S. 2011. What Can a Personal Robot Do for You? In R. Groß, L. Alboul, C. Melhuish, M. Witkowski, T. Prescott & J. Penders (Eds.), Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems, 6856, 360--371. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Caine, K. E., Fisk, A. D. and Rogers, W. A. 2007. Designing privacy conscious aware homes for older adults. In Hum. Fac. Erg. Soc. P. (Baltimore, MD, Oct 1-5, 2007). HFES'07.Google Scholar
- Cesta, A., Cortellessa, G., Giuliani, M. V., Pecora, F., Scopelliti, M. and Tiberio, L. 2007. Psychological implications of domestic assistive technology for the elderly. PsychNology J., 5, 3.Google Scholar
- Choi, Y. S., Deyle, T., Chen, T., Glass, J. D., and Kemp, C. C. 2009. A List of Household Objects for Robotic Retrieval Prioritized by People with ALS. In Proceedings of International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (Kyoto, 23-26 June, 2009). ICRR '09. IEEE. DOI = http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2009.5209484.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Clark, M. C., Czaja, S. J. and Weber, R. A. 1990. Older Adults and Daily Living Task Profiles. Hum. Factors, 32, 5(1990), 537--549.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S. N., Rogers, W. A. and Sharit, J. 2006. Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychol. Aging, 21 (2006), 333--352. DOI = http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Erber, J. T. (2005). Aging and older adulthood. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
- Ezer, N., Fisk, A. D. and Roger, W. A. 2009. More than a servant: Self-reported willingness of younger and older adults to having a robot perform interactive and critical tasks in the home. In Hum. Fac. Erg. Soc. P., (San Antonio, TX, Oct 19-23, 2009). HFES'09, 136--150.Google Scholar
- Fausset, C. B., Kelly, A. J., Rogers, W. A. and Fisk, A. D. 2011. Challenges to aging in place: Understanding home maintenance difficulties. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 25, 2 (May 2011), 125--141. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2011.571105.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fausset, C. B., Mayer, A. K., Rogers, W. A., and Fisk, A. D., 2009. Understanding Aging in Place for Older Adults: A Needs Analysis. In Hum. Fac. Erg. Soc. P., (San Antonio, TX, Oct 19-23, 2009). HFES'09, 521--525.Google Scholar
- Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W., A., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., and Sharit, J. 2009. Designing for Older Adults: Principles and creative Human Factors Approaches (2ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Gitlin, L. 2003. Conducting research on home environments: Lessons learned and new directions. The Gerontologist, 43, 5, 628--637. DOI = http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/43.5.628Google ScholarCross Ref
- Giuliani, M. V., Scopelliti, M., and Fornara, F. 2005. Elderly People at Home: Technological Help in Everyday Activities. IEEE Workshop on Robots and Human Interactive Communication, (2005), 365--370.Google Scholar
- Houser, A., Fox-Grage, W., and Gibson, M. J. 2006. Across the States 2006: Profiles of Long-Term Care and Independent Living. From http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/health/d18763_2006_ats.pdf.Google Scholar
- King, C., Chen, T., Fan, Z., Glass, J. D., and Kemp, C. C. 2011. Dusty: An assistive mobile manipulator that retrieves dropped objects for people with motor impairments. Disabil. Rehabil., (Oct, 2011). DOI = http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2011.615374.Google Scholar
- Lawton, M. P. 1990. Aging and performance of home tasks. Hum. Factors, 32, 5 (Oct 1990), 527--536.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lawton, M. P., and Nahemow, L. 1973. Ecology and the Aging Process. In C. Eisdorfer and M. Powell Lawton (eds). The Psychology of Adult Development and Aging, 619--674. Washington D.C.: APA.Google Scholar
- Melenhorst, A.-S., Rogers, W. A., and Bouwhuis, D. G. 2006. Older Adults' Motivated Choice for Technological Innovation: Evidence for Benefit-Driven Selectivity. Psychol. Aging, 21, 1 (Mar 2006), 190--195. DOI = http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.190.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pollack, M. E., Brown, L., Colbry, D., McCarthy, C. E., Orosz, C., Peintner, B., Ramakrishnan, S. and Tsamardinos, I. 2002. Autominder: an intelligent cognitive orthotic system for people with memory impairment. Robot. Auton. Syst., 44 (2002), 273--282. DOI = http://dx.doi.org/10.1.1.12.4554.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rogers, W. A., Meyer, B., Walker, N., and Fisk, A. D. 1998. Functional limitations to daily living tasks in the aged: A focus group analysis. Hum. Factors, 40, 1 (1998), 111--125.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Smarr, C.-A., Fausset, C. B., and Rogers, W. A. 2011. Understanding the potential for robot assistance for older adults in the home environment (HFA-TR-1102). Atlanta, GA: Georgia Tech, School of Psychology, Human Factors and Aging Laboratory. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/39670Google Scholar
- Smarr, C., Prakash A., Beer J., Mitzner T., Kemp, C. and Rogers W. In prep. Older Adults' Preferences for and Acceptance of Robot Assistance for ADLs.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau. 2011. International data base. World population by age and sex. From http://www.census.gov/population/international/data/idb/worldpop.php}.Google Scholar
- Wada, K., Shibata, T., Musha, T. and Kimura, S. 2008. Robot therapy for elders affected by dementia. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 27, 4 (2008), 53--60. DOI = http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MEMB.2008.919496.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- The domesticated robot: design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place
Recommendations
Home robotic devices for older adults: Opportunities and concerns
AbstractRobotic devices for older adults are becoming a reality. New robots are being introduced for the growing subpopulation of healthy older adults, with an emphasis on supporting the positive aspects of aging. In order to inform the design ...
Highlights- Older adults' attitudes and emotional reactions toward robotic devices were evaluated.
Older adults' medication management in the home: how can robots help?
HRI '13: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interactionSuccessful management of medications is critical to maintaining healthy and independent living for older adults. However, medication non-adherence is a common problem with a high risk for severe consequences, which can jeopardize older adults' chances ...
Socially assistive robots for the aging population: are we trapped in stereotypes?
HRI '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interactionRobots caring for the older population in care facilities and at home is an ongoing theme in HRI research. Research projects on this topic exist all over the globe in the USA, Europe, and Asia. All of these projects have the overall ambitious goal to ...
Comments