skip to main content
10.1145/2187836.2187890acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Structured query suggestion for specialization and parallel movement: effect on search behaviors

Published:16 April 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Query suggestion, which enables the user to revise a query with a single click, has become one of the most fundamental features of Web search engines. However, it is often difficult for the user to choose from a list of query suggestions, and to understand the relation between an input query and suggested ones. In this paper, we propose a new method to present query suggestions to the user, which has been designed to help two popular query reformulation actions, namely, specialization (e.g. from "nikon" to "nikon camera" ) and parallel movement (e.g. from "nikon camera" to "canon camera"). Using a query log collected from a popular commercial Web search engine, our prototype called SParQS classifies query suggestions into automatically generated categories and generates a label for each category. Moreover, SParQS presents some new entities as alternatives to the original query (e.g. "canon" in response to the query "nikon"), together with their query suggestions classified in the same way as the original query's suggestions. We conducted a task-based user study to compare SParQS with a traditional "flat list" query suggestion interface. Our results show that the SParQS interface enables subjects to search more successfully than the flat list case, even though query suggestions presented were exactly the same in the two interfaces. In addition, the subjects found the query suggestions more helpful when they were presented in the SParQS interface rather than in a flat list.

References

  1. A. Amin, M. Hildebrand, J. van Ossenbruggen, V. Evers, and L. Hardman. Organizing suggestions in autocompletion interfaces. In Proc. of ECIR, pages 521--529, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Anagnostopoulos, L. Becchetti, C. Castillo, and A. Gionis. An optimization framework for query recommendation. In Proc. of WSDM, pages 161--170, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. P. Anick. Using terminological feedback for web search refinement: a log-based study. In Proc. of SIGIR, pages 88--95, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R. Baeza-Yates, C. Hurtado, and M. Mendoza. Query recommendation using query logs in search engines. In Current Trends in Database Technology-EDBT 2004 Workshops, pages 588--596, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. P. Boldi, F. Bonchi, C. Castillo, D. Donato, A. Gionis, and S. Vigna. The query-flow graph: model and applications. In Proc. of CIKM, pages 609--618, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. P. Boldi, F. Bonchi, C. Castillo, and S. Vigna. From Dango to Japanese Cakes: Query Reformulation Models and Patterns. In Proc. of WI, pages 183--190, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. H. Cao, D. Jiang, J. Pei, Q. He, Z. Liao, E. Chen, and H. Li. Context-aware query suggestion by mining click-through and session data. In Proc. of KDD, pages 875--883, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Dumais and N. J. Belkin. The TREC interactive tracks: Putting the user into search. In E. Voorhees and D. Harman, editors, TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval, pages 123--152. MIT Press, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. S. Dumais, E. Cutrell, and H. Chen. Optimizing search by showing results in context. In Proc. of CHI, pages 277--284, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Guo, X. Cheng, G. Xu, and H. Shen. A Structured Approach to Query Recommendation With Social Annotation Data. In Proc. of CIKM, pages 619--628, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Guo, G. Xu, X. Cheng, and H. Li. Named entity recognition in query. In Proc. of SIGIR, pages 267--274, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Q. He, D. Jiang, Z. Liao, S. Hoi, K. Chang, E. Lim, and H. Li. Web query recommendation via sequential query prediction. In Proc. of ICDE, pages 1443--1454, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. R. Johnson and D. Wichern. Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 4th ed. Prentice Hall, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. Kamvar and S. Baluja. Query suggestions for mobile search: understanding usage patterns. In Proc. of CHI, pages 1013--1016, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. D. Kelly, A. Cushing, M. Dostert, X. Niu, and K. Gyllstrom. Effects of popularity and quality on the usage of query suggestions during information search. In Proc. of CHI, pages 45--54, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. D. Kelly, K. Gyllstrom, and E. Bailey. A comparison of query and term suggestion features for interactive searching. In Proc. of SIGIR, pages 371--378, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. Komachi and H. Suzuki. Minimally supervised learning of semantic knowledge from query logs. In Proc. of IJCNLP, pages 358--365, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. H. Ma, H. Yang, I. King, and M. Lyu. Learning latent semantic relations from clickthrough data for query suggestion. In Proc. of CIKM, pages 709--718, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Q. Mei, D. Zhou, and K. Church. Query suggestion using hitting time. In Proc. of CIKM, pages 469--478, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. G. Nemhauser, L. Wolsey, and M. Fisher. An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions-I. Mathematical Programming, 14(1):265--294, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. E. Sadikov, J. Madhavan, L. Wang, and A. Halevy. Clustering query refinements by user intent. In Proc. of WWW, pages 841--850, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. S. Sekine, K. Sudo, and C. Nobata. Extended named entity hierarchy. In Proc. of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2002), pages 1818--1824, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. S. Sekine and H. Suzuki. Acquiring ontological knowledge from query logs. In Proc. of WWW, pages 1223--1224, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. J. Sim and C. Wright. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Physical therapy, 85(3):257--268, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Y. Song and L. He. Optimal rare query suggestion with implicit user feedback. In Proc. of WWW, pages 901--910, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Y. Song, D. Zhou, and L.-w. He. Post-ranking query suggestion by diversifying search results. In Proc. of SIGIR, pages 815--824, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. J. Wen, J. Nie, and H. Zhang. Clustering user queries of a search engine. In Proc. of WWW, pages 162--168, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. R. White and G. Marchionini. Examining the effectiveness of real-time query expansion. Information Processing & Management, 43(3):685--704, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. K. Yee, K. Swearingen, K. Li, and M. Hearst. Faceted metadata for image search and browsing. In Proc. of CHI, pages 401--408, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. X. Yin and S. Shah. Building taxonomy of web search intents for name entity queries. In Proc. of WWW, pages 1001--1010, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Structured query suggestion for specialization and parallel movement: effect on search behaviors

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WWW '12: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web
      April 2012
      1078 pages
      ISBN:9781450312295
      DOI:10.1145/2187836

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 April 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader