skip to main content
10.1145/2187980.2188262acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Collective attention and the dynamics of group deals

Published:16 April 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a study of the group purchasing behavior of daily deals in Groupon and LivingSocial and formulate a predictive dynamic model of collective attention for group buying behavior. Using large data sets from both Groupon and LivingSocial we show how the model is able to predict the success of group deals as a function of time.We find that Groupon deals are easier to predict accurately earlier in the deal lifecycle than LivingSocial deals due to the total number of deal purchases saturating quicker. One possible explanation for this is that the incentive to socially propagate a deal is based on an individual threshold in LivingSocial, whereas in Groupon it is based on a collective threshold which is reached very early. Furthermore, the personal benefit of propagating a deal is greater in LivingSocial.

References

  1. A. Arabshahi. Undressing Groupon: An analysis of the Groupon business model, December 2010. Available at http://www.ahmadalia.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. Asur, B. A. Huberman, G. Szabó, and C. Wang. Trends in social media : Persistence and decay. CoRR, abs/1102.1402, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. E. Bakshy, B. Karrer, and L. A. Adamic. Social influence and the diffusion of user-created content. In ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pages 325--334, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. W. Byers, M. Mitzenmacher, M. Potamias, and G. Zervas. A month in the life of Groupon. CoRR, abs/1105.0903, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. W. Byers, M. Mitzenmacher, M. Potamias, and G. Zervas. Daily deals: Prediction, social diffusion, and reputation ramifications. CoRR, abs/1105.0903, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. R. Colbaugh and K. Glass. Early warning analysis for social diffusion events. In ISI, pages 37--42, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. U. M. Dholakia. How effective are Groupon promotions for businesses? September 28, 2010. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1696327.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. P. DiMaggio and H. Louch. Socially embedded consumer transactions: For what kinds of purchases do people most often use networks? American Sociological Review, 63:619--637, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M. Grabchak, N. L. Bhamidipati, R. Bhatt, and D. Garg. Adaptive policies for selecting Groupon style chunked reward ads in a stochastic knapsack framework. In Proceedings of 20th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Guo, M. Wang, and J. Leskovec. The role of social networks in online shopping: Information passing, price of trust, and consumer choice. In ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. JiWire. JiWire Mobile Audience Insights Report Q1 2011, 2011. Available at http://www.jiwire.com/insights.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. K. Lerman and A. Galstyan. Analysis of social voting patterns on Digg. In ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Online Social Networks, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. K. Lerman and R. Ghosh. Information contagion: An empirical study of spread of news on Digg and Twitter social networks. In Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), May 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. K. Lerman and T. Hogg. Using a model of social dynamics to predict popularity of news. In Proceedings of 19th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. K. Lerman and T. Hogg. Using stochastic models to describe and predict social dynamics of web users. to appear in ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Leskovec, L. A. Adamic, and B. A. Huberman. The dynamics of viral marketing. ACM Transactions on the Web, 1(1), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. G. Szabó and B. A. Huberman. Predicting the popularity of online content. Commun. ACM, 53(8):80--88, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. F. Wu and B. A. Huberman. Novelty and collective attention. PNAS, 104(45), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Collective attention and the dynamics of group deals

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        WWW '12 Companion: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web
        April 2012
        1250 pages
        ISBN:9781450312301
        DOI:10.1145/2187980

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 16 April 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • tutorial

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader