Christopher Power
David Swallow
ABSTRACT
This paper describes an empirical study of the problems encountered by 32 blind users on the Web. Task-based user evaluations were undertaken on 16 websites, yielding 1383 instances of user problems. The results showed that only 50.4% of the problems encountered by users were covered by Success Criteria in the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG 2.0). For user problems that were covered by WCAG 2.0, 16.7% of websites implemented techniques recommended in WCAG 2.0 but the techniques did not solve the problems. These results show that few developers are implementing the current version of WCAG, and even when the guidelines are implemented on websites there is little indication that people with disabilities will encounter fewer problems. The paper closes by discussing the implications of this study for future research and practice. In particular, it discusses the need to move away from a problem-based approach towards a design principle approach for web accessibility.
- Research Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines. U.S. General Services Administration, 2004.Google Scholar
- Equality Act 2010. Government Equalities Office, 2010.Google Scholar
- Alonso, F., Fuertes, J. L., González, Á. L. and Martíez, L. On the testability of WCAG 2.0 for beginners. In Proc. of W4A'10, ACM (2010). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Babu, R. and Singh, R. (2009) Evaluation of Web Accessibility and Usability from Blind User's Perspective: The Context of Online Assessment, in (AISeL), A. E. L., ed. Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) 2009, San Francisco, Paper 623, 2009.Google Scholar
- Brajnik, G., Yesilada, Y. and Harper, S. Testability and validity of WCAG 2.0: the expertise effect. In Proc. of ASSETS 2010, ACM (2010), 43--50. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Caldwell, B., Cooper, M., Guarino Reid, L. and Vanderheiden, G. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consoritum (W3C), 2008. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/ on Jan. 15, 2012.Google Scholar
- Colwell, C. and Petrie, H. Evaluation of guidelines for designing accessible Web content. SIGCAPH Comput. Phys. Handicap., 70 (2001), 11--13. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cooper, M., Guarino Reid, L., Vanderheiden, G. and Caldwell, B. Understanding WCAG 2.0: A guide to understanding and implementing Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), 2010. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDINGWCAG20/ on Jan. 15, 2012.Google Scholar
- Cooper, M., Guarino Reid, L., Vanderheiden, G. and Caldwell, B. Techniques for WCAG 2.0: Techniques and Failures for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), 2010. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/ on Jan. 15, 2012.Google Scholar
- Disability Rights Commission. The Web: access and inclusion for disabled people - A formal Investigation conducted by the Disability Rights Commission. Disability Rights Commission, 2004,Google Scholar
- Donnelly, A. and Magennis, M. Making Accessibility Guidelines Usable. In Proc. Universal Access: Theoretical Perspectives, Practice and Experience, Springer (2003), 56--57. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Freed, F. and Rothberg, M. Accessible Digital Media Guidelines, National Centre for Accessible Media Website, (2006). Retrieved from http://ncam.wgbh.org/invent_build/web_multimedia/accessible-digital-media-guide on Jan. 15, 2012.Google Scholar
- Goette, T., Collier, C. and Daniels White, J. An exploratory study of the accessibility of state government Web sites. Universal Access in the Information Society, 5, 1 (2006), 41--50. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hackett, S. and Parmanto, B. A longitudinal evaluation of accessibility: higher education web sites. Internet Research, 15, 3 (2005), 281--294.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Henry, S. L. Introduction to Web Accessibility. Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), 2005. Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.php on Jan. 15, 2012.Google Scholar
- Kane, S. K., Shulman, J. A., Shockley, T. J. and Ladner, R. E. A web accessibility report card for top international university web sites. In Proc. of W4A'07, ACM (2007), 148--156. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kelly, B., Sloan, D., Phipps, L., Petrie, H. and Hamilton, F. Forcing standardization or accommodating diversity?: a framework for applying the WCAG in the real world. In Proc. of W4A'05, ACM (2005), 46--54. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lazar, J., Dudley-Sponaugle, A. and Greenidge, K.-D. Improving web accessibility: a study of webmaster perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 2 (2004), 269--288.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lazar, J. and Greenridge, K.-D. One year older, but not necessarily wiser: an evaluation of homepage accessibility problems over time. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4, 4 (2006), 285--291. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leporini, B. and Paternò, F. Applying Web Usability Criteria for Vision-Impaired Users: Does It Really Improve Task Performance? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24, 1 (2008), 17--47.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Leuthold, S., Bargas-Avila, J. A. and Opwis, K. Beyond web content accessibility guidelines: Design of enhanced text user interfaces for blind internet users. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, 4 (2008), 257--270. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lopes, R., Gomes, D. and Carriço, L. Web Not For All: A Large Scale Study of Web Accessibility. In Proc. of W4A'10, ACM (2010), 10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nielsen, J. Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, Boston, MA, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Petrie, H., Badani, A. and Bhalla, A. Sex, lies and web accessibility: the use of accessibility logos and statements on e-commerce and financial websites. In Proc. of ADDW 2005, University of Dundee (2005). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Petrie, H. and Kheir, O. The relationship between accessibility and usability of websites. In Proc. of CHI'07, ACM (2007), 397--406. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Petrie, H., Power, C., Swallow, D., Velasco, C. A., Gallagher, B., Magennis, M., Murphy, E., Collin, S. and Down, K. The value chain of web accessibility: challenges and opportunities. In Proc. of ADDW 2011, Sun SITE Central Europe (2011).Google Scholar
- Power, C., Petrie, H., Freire, A. and Swallow, D. Remote Evaluation of WCAG 2.0 Techniques by Web Users with Visual Disabilities. In Proc. of UAHCI: Design for All and eInclusion, 6765, (2011), 285--294. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Regan, B. Accessibility and design: a failure of the imagination. In Proc. of W4A'04, ACM (2004), 29--37. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rømen, D. and Svanæs, D. Evaluating web site accessibility: validating the WAI guidelines through usability testing with disabled users. In Proc. of the 5th NordiCHI 2008, ACM (2008), 535--538. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sloan, D., Gregor, P., Booth, P. and Gibson, L. Auditing accessibility of UK Higher Education web sites. Interacting with Computers, 14, 4 (2002), 313--325.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thatcher, J., Burkes, M. R., Heilmann, C., Henry, S. L., Kirkpatrick, A., Lauke, P. H., Lawson, B., Regan, B., Rutter, R., Urban, M. and Waddel, C. D. Web accessibility: web standards and regulatory compliance. Friends of ED, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vanderheiden, G., Chisholm, W. and Jacobs, I. Web Content Accessibility Guildeines 1.0. Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), 1999. Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/ on Jan. 15, 2012.Google Scholar
- Williams, R. and Rattray, R. An assessment of Web accessibility of UK accountancy firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 18, 9 (2003), 710--716.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Guidelines are only half of the story: accessibility problems encountered by blind users on the web
Recommendations
Guidelines for an accessible web automation interface
ASSETS '11: The proceedings of the 13th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibilityIn recent years, the Web has become an ever more sophisticated and irreplaceable tool in our daily lives. While the visual Web has been advancing at a rapid pace, assistive technology has not been able to keep up, increasingly putting visually impaired ...
Why read if you can skim: towards enabling faster screen reading
W4A '12: Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web AccessibilitySkimming broadly refers to different speed-reading methods that aim to enhance the rate of reading without unduly compromising on comprehension and retention of information. Skimming of content could be particularly useful for people with vision ...
Correlating Navigation Barriers on Web 2.0 with Accessibility Guidelines
Computers Helping People with Special NeedsAbstractThe constant emergence of new resources and interaction possibilities brought by web 2.0 brings a constant urge of keeping in track how those new elements can affect the interaction of people with disabilities and how far current re-search has ...
Comments