skip to main content
10.1145/2207676.2208405acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

HoloDesk: direct 3d interactions with a situated see-through display

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

HoloDesk is an interactive system combining an optical see through display and Kinect camera to create the illusion that users are directly interacting with 3D graphics. A virtual image of a 3D scene is rendered through a half silvered mirror and spatially aligned with the real-world for the viewer. Users easily reach into an interaction volume displaying the virtual image. This allows the user to literally get their hands into the virtual display and to directly interact with an spatially aligned 3D virtual world, without the need for any specialized head-worn hardware or input device. We introduce a new technique for interpreting raw Kinect data to approximate and track rigid (e.g., books, cups) and non-rigid (e.g., hands, paper) physical objects and support a variety of physics-inspired interactions between virtual and real. In particular the algorithm models natural human grasping of virtual objects with more fidelity than previously demonstrated. A qualitative study highlights rich emergent 3D interactions, using hands and real-world objects. The implementation of HoloDesk is described in full, and example application scenarios explored. Finally, HoloDesk is quantitatively evaluated in a 3D target acquisition task, comparing the system with indirect and glasses-based variants.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

paperfile1967-3.mp4

mp4

87.9 MB

References

  1. Agrawala, M., et al. The two-user responsive workbench: support for collaboration through individual views of a shared space. In Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH (1997), 327--332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bimber, O., et al. The extended virtual table: An optical extension for table-like projection systems. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 10 (December 2001), 613--631. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bimber, O., and Raskar, R. Spatial Augmented Reality: Merging Real and Virtual Worlds. A. K. Peters, Ltd., Natick, MA, USA, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Brox, T., et al. High accuracy optical flow estimation based on a theory for warping. Computer 4, May (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Butler, A., et al. Vermeer: Direct Interaction with a 360° Viewable 3D Display. In Proc. ACM UIST (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Czernuszenko, M., et al. The immersadesk and infinity wall projection-based virtual reality displays. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 31 (May 1997), 46--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Feng, Z., et al. Trends in augmented reality tracking, interaction and display: A review of ten years of ISMAR. In Proc. IEEE ISMAR (2008), 193--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Graham, E. D., and MacKenzie, C. L. Physical versus virtual pointing. In Proc. ACM CHI (1996), 292--299. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Grossman, T., and Wigdor, D. Going Deeper: a Taxonomy of 3D on the Tabletop. In Proc. ACM ITS, IEEE (Oct. 2007), 137--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Hachet, M., et al. Toucheo: Multitouch and Stereo Combined in a Seamless Workspace. In Proc. ACM UIST (Oct. 2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hancock, M., Carpendale, S., and Cockburn, A. Shallow-Depth 3D Interaction: design and evaluation of one-, two- and three-touch techniques. In Proc. ACM CHI (2007), 1147--1156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hilliges, O., et al. Interactions in the Air: Adding Further Depth to Interactive Tabletops. In Proc. ACM UIST (2009), 139--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hoffman, D., et al. Vergence accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. IJVR 8, 3 (2008), 33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Izadi, S., et al. C-Slate: A Multi-Touch and Object Recognition System for Remote Collaboration using Horizontal Surfaces. In IEEE Tabletop, vol. 0, IEEE (2007), 3--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Izadi, S., et al. Going beyond the display. In Proc. ACM UIST, ACM (2008), 269. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Izadi, S., et al. KinectFusion: Real-time 3D Reconstruction and Interaction Using a Moving Depth Camera. In Proc. ACM UIST, ACM (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Johnson, A., Scharver, C., and Leigh, J. Designing Cranial Implants in a Haptic Augmented Reality Environment. Communications of the ACM 47, 8 (2004), 32--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kakehi, Y., et al. Tablescape Plus: Interactive Small-sized Vertical Displays on a Horizontal Tabletop Display. In Proc. ACM ITS, IEEE (2007), 155--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim, S. W., Treskunov, A., and Marti, S. DRIVE: Directly Reaching Into Virtual Environment with bare hand manipulation behind mobile display. In Proc. IEEE 3D UI (2011), 107--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Knödel, S., and Hachet, M. Multi-touch RST in 2D and 3D Spaces: Studying the Impact of Directness on User Performance. In Proc. IEEE 3D UI (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lee, T., and Hollerer, T. Handy AR: Markerless Inspection of Augmented Reality Objects Using Fingertip Tracking. In Proc. ISWC, IEEE (2007), 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Malik, S., and Laszlo, J. Visual touchpad: a two-handed gestural input device. In Proc. ACM ICMI (2004), 289. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Martinet, A., et al. The design and evaluation of 3d positioning techniques for multi-touch displays. In Proc. IEEE 3D UI (2010), 115--118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. McKenna, M. Interactive viewpoint control and three-dimensional operations. In Proc SI3D, vol. 25, ACM (1992), 53--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Mulder, J. D., and Liere, R. V. The personal space station: Bringing interaction within reach. In Proc. VRIC (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Nakashima, B. K., et al. A 2D-3D Integrated Tabletop Environment for Multi-user Collaboration. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 18, 1 (November 2007), 39--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Olwal, A., et al. ASTOR: An Autostereoscopic Optical See-through Augmented Reality System. In Proc. IEEE ISMAR, IEEE (2005), 24--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Papagiannakis, G., et al. A survey of mobile and wireless technologies for augmented reality systems. Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds 19 (February 2008), 3--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Paris, S., and Durand, F. A Fast Approximation of the Bilateral Filter Using a Signal Processing Approach. IJCV 81, 1 (Dec. 2007), 24--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Poston, T., and Serra, L. The virtual workbench: dextrous VR. In Proc. ACM VRST (1994), 111--121. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Prachyabrued, M., and Borst, C. W. Dropping the ball: Releasing a virtual grasp. In Proc. ACM VRST (2011), 59--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Reisman, J. L., et al. A screen-space formulation for 2D and 3D direct manipulation. In Proc. ACM UIST (2009), 69--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Stavness, I., Lam, B., and Fels, S. pCubee : A Perspective-Corrected Handheld Cubic Display. In Proc. ACM CHI (2010), 1381--1390. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Ware, C., Arthur, K., and Booth, K. S. Fish Tank Virtual Reality. In Proc. ACM CHI, ACM (1993), 37--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Wilson, A. D. Depth-Sensing Video Cameras for 3D Tangible Tabletop Interaction. In Proc. ACM ITS, IEEE (2007), 201--204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Wilson, A. D. Simulating Grasping Behavior on an Imaging Interactive Surface. In Proc. ACM ITS, ACM (2007), 125--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Wilson, A. D., and Benko, H. Combining multiple depth cameras and projectors for interactions on, above and between surfaces. In Proc. ACM UIST (2010), 273--282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Wilson, A. D., et al. Bringing Physics to the Surface. In Proc. ACM UIST (2008), 67--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Yoshida, T., et al. Repro3d: full-parallax 3d display using retro-reflective projection technology. In Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH, ACM (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Zhang, Z. A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22, 11 (2000), 1330--1334. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. HoloDesk: direct 3d interactions with a situated see-through display

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2012
      3276 pages
      ISBN:9781450310154
      DOI:10.1145/2207676

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 May 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader