skip to main content
10.1145/2228360.2228452acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Near-optimal, dynamic module reconfiguration in a photovoltaic system to combat partial shading effects

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Partial shading is a serious obstacle to effective utilization of photovoltaic (PV) systems since it can result in significant output power degradation for the system. A PV system is organized as a series connection of PV modules, each module comprising of a number of series-parallel connected cells. This paper presents modified PV cell structures with integrated switches, imbalanced cell connection topologies for PV modules, and a dynamic programming algorithm to produce near-optimal reconfigurations of each PV module with the goal of maximizing the system output power level under any partial shading patterns. Through simulations, we have demonstrated up to a factor of 2.3X improvement in the output power level of a PV system comprised of 3 PV modules with 60 PV cells per module.

References

  1. N. Femia, G. Petrone, G. Spagnuolo, and M. Vitelli, "Optimization of perturb and observe maximum power point tracking method," IEEE T. on Power Electronics, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. F. Liu, S. Duan, F. Liu, B. Liu, and Y. Kang, "A variable step size INC MPPT method for PV systems," IEEE T. on Industrial Electronics, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Y. Kim, N. Chang, Y. Wang, and M. Pedram, "Maximum power transfer tracking for a photovoltaic-supercapacitor energy system," in ISLPED, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Lu, V. Raghunathan, and K. Roy, "Maximum power point considerations in micro-scale solar energy harvesting systems," in IEEE ISCAS, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. H. Patel, and V. Agarwal, "Maximum power point tracking scheme for PV systems operating under partially shaded conditions," IEEE T. on Industrial Electronics, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. R. Bruendlinger, B. Bletterie, M. Milde, and H. Oldenkamp, "Maximum power point tracking performance under partially shaded PV array conditions," in Proc. 21st EUPVSEC, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. D. Nguyen, and B. Lehman, "An adaptive solar photovoltaic array using model-based reconfiguration algorithm," IEEE T. on Industrial Electronics, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. G. Velasco-Quesada, F. Guinjoan-Gispert, R. Pique-Lopez, M. Roman-Lumbreras, and A. Conesa-Rosa, "Electrical PV array reconfiguration strategy for energy extraction improvement in grid-connected PV systems," IEEE T. on Industrial Electronics, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. A. Chaaban, M. Alahmad, J. Neal, J. Shi, C. Berryman, Y. Cho, S. Lau, H. Li, A. Schwer, Z. Shen, J. Stansbury, and T. Zhang, "Adaptive photovoltaic system," in IECON, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Y. Kim, S. Park, Y. Wang, Q. Xie, N. Chang, M. Poncino, and M. Pedram, "Balanced reconfiguration of storage banks in a hybrid electrical energy storage system," in ICCAD, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. W. Lee, Y. Kim, Y. Wang, N. Chang, M. Pedram, and S. Han, "Versatile high-fidelity photovoltaic module emulation system," in ISLPED, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Y. Wang, Y. Kim, Q. Xie, N. Chang, and M. Pedram, "Charge migration efficiency optimization in hybrid electrical energy storage (HEES) systems," in ISLPED, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Near-optimal, dynamic module reconfiguration in a photovoltaic system to combat partial shading effects

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DAC '12: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Design Automation Conference
      June 2012
      1357 pages
      ISBN:9781450311991
      DOI:10.1145/2228360

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 June 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,770of5,499submissions,32%

      Upcoming Conference

      DAC '24
      61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
      June 23 - 27, 2024
      San Francisco , CA , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader