skip to main content
10.1145/2247596.2247632acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesedbtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A generic data model and query language for spatiotemporal OLAP cube analysis

Published:27 March 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Nowadays, organizations need to use OLAP (On Line Analytical Processing) tools together with geographical information. To support this, the notion of SOLAP (Spatial OLAP) arouse, aimed at exploring spatial data in the same way as OLAP operates over tables. SOLAP however, only accounts for discrete spatial data. More sophisticated GIS-based decision support systems are increasingly being needed, to handle more complex types of data, like continuous fields. Fields describe physical phenomena that change continuously in time and/or space (e.g., temperature). Although many models have been proposed for adding spatial information to OLAP tools, no one allows the user to perceive data as a cube, and analyze any type of spatial data, continuous or discrete, together with typical alphanumerical discrete OLAP data, using only the classic OLAP operators (e.g., Roll-up, Drill-down). In this paper we propose an algebra that operates over data cubes, independently of the underlying data types and physical data representation. That means, in our approach, the final user only sees the typical OLAP operators at the query level. At lower abstraction levels we provide discrete and continuous spatial data support as well as different ways of partitioning the space. We also describe a proof-of-concept implementation to illustrate the ideas presented in the paper. As far as we are aware of, this is the first proposal that allows analyzing discrete and continuous spatiotemporal data and OLAP cubes together, using just the traditional OLAP operations, thus providing a very general framework for spatiotemporal data analysis.

References

  1. A. Abelló, J. Samos, and F. Saltor. On relationships offering new drill-across possibilities. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM international workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP, DOLAP '02, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Agrawal, A. Gupta, and S. Sarawagi. Modeling multidimensional databases. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Data Engineering, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. T. O. Ahmed and M. Miquel. Multidimensional structures dedicated to continuous spatiotemporal phenomena. In BNCOD, pages 29--40, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Bimonte and M.-A. Kang. Towards a model for the multidimensional analysis of field data. In Proceedings of the 14th east European conference on Advances in databases and information systems, ADBIS'10, pages 58--72, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. L. Gómez, S. Gómez, and A. Vaisman. Analyzing continuous fields with olap cubes. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM international workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP, DOLAP '11, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. L. Gómez, A. Vaisman, and E. Zimányi. Physical design and implementation of spatial data warehouses supporting continuous fields. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Data warehousing and knowledge discovery, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Gyssens and L. V. S. Lakshmanan. A foundation for multi-dimensional databases. In Proceedings of 23rd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB'97), pages 106--115, Athens, Greece, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. C. Hurtado, A. Mendelzon, and A. Vaisman. Maintaining data cubes under dimension updates. In Proceedings of IEEE/ICDE'99, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. G. V. Jones. Climate and terroir: Impacts of climate variability and change on wine. In Fine Wine and Terroir-The Geoscience Perspective, Geoscience Canada Reprint Series Number 9, Geological Association of Canada, St. John's, Newfoundland, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. R. Kimball. The Data Warehouse Toolkit. J. Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. R. Kimball and M. Ross. The Data Warehouse Toolkit: The Complete Guide to Dimensional Modeling, 2nd. Ed. J. Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. P. Kumler. An intensive comparison of Triangulated Irregular Networks (TINs) and Digital Elevation Models (DEMs). Cartographica, 31:45, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. H. Ledoux and C. Gold. A voronoi-based map algebra. In A. Riedl, W. Kainz, and G. A. Elmes, editors, Progress in Spatial Data Handling, pages 117--131. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. J. Mennis and R. Viger. Analyzing time series of satellite imagery using temporal map algebra. In Proceedings of the ASPRS Annual Conference, Denver, CO., 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Mennis, R. Viger, and C. Tomlin. Cubic map algebra functions for spatio-temporal analysis. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 32(1):17--32, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. J. L. Mennis. Multidimensional map algebra: Design and implementation of a spatio-temporal gis processing language. T. GIS, 14(1):1--21, 2010Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. S. Rivest, Y. Bédard, and P. Marchand. Toward better suppport for spatial decision making: Defining the characteristics of spatial on-line analytical processing (SOLAP). Geomatica, 55(4):539--555, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. Shanmugasundaram, U. M. Fayyad, and P. S. Bradley. Compressed data cubes for OLAP aggregate query approximation on continuous dimensions. In Proc. of KDD, pages 223--232, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. D. Tomlin. Geographic Information Systems and Cartographic Modelling. Prentice-Hall, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. A. A. Vaisman and E. Zimányi. A multidimensional model representing continuous fields in spatial data warehouses. In Proc. of ACM-GIS, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. T. van der Putte and H. Ledoux. Modelling three-dimensional geoscientic datasets with the discrete voronoi diagram. In Proceedings of 3D GeoInfo 2010, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. P. Vassiliadis. Modeling multidimensional databases, cubes and cube operations. In 10th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management, Proceedings, Capri, Italy, July 1--3, 1998 (SSDBM'98), pages 53--62, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. M. F. Worboys and M. Duckham. GIS: A Computing Perspective. CRC Press, second edition, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A generic data model and query language for spatiotemporal OLAP cube analysis

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            EDBT '12: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Extending Database Technology
            March 2012
            643 pages
            ISBN:9781450307901
            DOI:10.1145/2247596

            Copyright © 2012 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 27 March 2012

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate7of10submissions,70%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader