skip to main content
10.1145/2317956.2317964acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Telematic dinner party: designing for togetherness through play and performance

Published:11 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

There is an increasing desire to remain connected when physically distant and computer-mediated communication (CMC) is one means of satisfying this desire. In particular, there is a growing trend for individuals to use commercially available technology to connect with friends and family in social and leisure settings. Drawing on this trend, performative arts and existing telecommunications research, we identify the social practice of sharing a meal together as ripe for reinterpretation within CMC. We explore the opportunities to design a technology platform that supports remote guests in experiencing togetherness and playfulness within the practices of a traditional dinner party. Through both visual and aural channels as well as remote agency, the dinner guests were able to share a holistic telematic dining experience comparable to a traditional co-presence dinner. Based on the findings, we propose that one must consider the social structure and cultural background of users to inform the design of a technological intervention.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Andriessen, J. H., and Roe, R. A. Telematics and Work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hove, UK, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Biocca, F. Virtual Reality: A tutorial. Journal of Communication 42, 4, (1992), 23--72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Biocca, F. and Harms, C. Defining and measuring social presence: Contribution to the Networked Minds Theory and Measure. In Proc. of PRESENCE 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Biocca, F., Burgoon, J., Harms, C., and Stoner, M. Criteria and scope conditions for a theory and measure of social presence. Presence 2001, 4th Annual International Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bødker, S. When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. In Proc. of NordiCHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Clark, A. Some Tentative Thoughts on Diaspora and the Emergence of Voice and Video over the Internet. AEN Journal, 2 1 (2007) 47--49Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Counihan, C., and Van, E. P. Food and culture: a reader. Routledge, New York, USA, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Bennett, S. An Exploratory Model of Play. American Anthropologist 73, 1 (1971), 45--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Egido, C. Video conferencing as a technology to support group work: a review of its failures. In Proc. CSCW 1988, ACM Press (1988), 13--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fish, R. S., Kraut, R. E., Root, R. W., and Rice, R. E. Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication. In Proc. CHI 1992, ACM Press (1992), 37--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Foley-Fisher, Z., Tsao, V., Wang, J., and Fels, S. NetPot: Easy Meal Enjoyment for Distant Diners. Entertainment Computing, 6243, (2010), 446--448. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gaver, B. and Sengers, P. Staying Open to Interpretation: Engaging Multiple Meanings in Design and Evaluation, Proc DIS 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Giges, B. and Warburton, E. C. From Router to Front Row:Lubricious Transfer and the Aesthetics of Telematic Performance. LEONARDO 43 1 (2010), 24--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Grimes, A., and Harper, R. Celebratory technology: new directions for food research in HCI. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 467--476. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Grudin, J. Why CSCW applications fail: Problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces. In Proc. of CSCW 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Gunawardena, C. N. Social Presence Theory and Implications for Interaction and Collaborative Learning in Computer Conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1, 2, (1995), 147--166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Harms, C. and Biocca, F. Internal consistency and reliability of the networked minds social presence measure. Presence Workshop, (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hassanein, K. and Head, M. Manipulating perceived social presence through the web interface and its impact on attitude towards online shopping. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 65, 8 (2007), 689--708. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Hauber, J., Regenbrecht, H., Hills, A., Cockburn, A. and Billinghurst, M. Social Presence in Two- and Three dimensional Videoconferencing. In Proc. Presence 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Heath, C. and Luff, P. Disembodied Conduct: Interactional Asymmetries in Video-Mediated Communication. In Proc. CHI 1991, ACM Press (1991), 99--103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Huizinga, J. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. Beacon Press, Boston, MA, USA 1950.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. IJsselsteijn, W. Staying in Touch. Social Presence and Connectedness through Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication Media. In Proc of HCI 2003, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (2003), 924--928.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Karahalios, K., and Dobson, K. Chit chat club: Bridging virtual and physical space for social interaction. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2005, ACM Press (2000), 1957--1960. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., and Jochems, W. M. G. Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behaviour, 19, 3, (2003), 335--353.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Lipartito, K. Picturephone and the Information Age The Social Meaning of Failure 1957. Technology and Culture, 44, 1, (2003), 50--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Mann, J. and Teran, M. Experiments in Connected Social Spaces. LiveForm:Telekinetics. 2001. http://www.lftk.org/tiki/tiki-index.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Mantovani, G. and Riva G. "Real" Presence: How Different Ontologies Generate Different Criteria for Presence, Telepresence, and Virtual Presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8, 5, (1999), 540--550. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Markopoulos P, IJsselsteijn W, Huijnen C, Romijn O, Philopoulos A. Supporting social presence through asynchronous awareness systems. In: Riva G, Davide F, IJsselsteijn WA (eds) Being there: concepts, effects and measurements of user presence in synthetic environments, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Mennecke, B., Triplett, J L..., Hassall, L. M., Heer, R. and Conde, Z. J. EmbodiedSocial Presence Theory. IEEE Computer Society, (2008) 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Meir, N. K. "A Fashionable Dinner Is Arranged as Follows": Victorian Dining Taxonomies. Victorian Literature and Culture, 33, (2005), 133--148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Nowak, K. Defining and Differentiating Copresence, Social Presence and Presence as Transportation. In Proc HCI 2001, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (2001), 686--690.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Nowak, K. and Biocca, F. Understanding The Influence of Agency and Anthropomorphism on Copresence, Social Presence and Physical Presence With Virtual Humans. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12,5, 481--494. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Pendergast, M. and Hayne, S., Groupware and social networks: will life ever be the same again? Information and Software Technology, 41, 6, (1999), 311--318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Rettie, R. (2003). Connectedness, awareness and social presence. PRESENCE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Robert, L. and Dennis, A. R. Paradox of Richness: A Cognitive Model of Media Choice. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 48, 1, (2005), 10--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Sacau, A., Gouveia, L. B., Gouveia, F. R., and Biocca, F. Presence in Computer-Mediated Environments: A short review of the main concepts, theories and trends. In Proc. of the IADIS 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Salen, K., and Zimmerman, E. Rules of Play. MIT Press, Boston, MA, USA, 2003Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Schreer, O., Kauff, P., and Sikora, T. 3D Video communication: Algorithms, Concepts and Realtime Systems in Human Centred Communication. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Shanken, E. A. Tele-Agency: Telematics, Telerobotics, and the Art of Meaning. Art Journal, 59, 2 (2000), 64--77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Stay Connected with Your Long Distance Love on Valentine's Day http://www.geeksquad.com/intelligence/blog/stay-connected-with-your-long-distance-love-on-valentines-day/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Strang, R. Measures of Social Intelligence. American Journal of Sociology, 36, 2 (1930), 263--269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. vom Lehn, D. and Heath, H. Discovering Exhibits: Video-Based Studies of Interaction in Museums and Science Centres. In: Knoblauch, H. and Schnettler, B. and Raab, J. and Soeffner, H. Video Analysis: Methodology and Methods: Qualitative Audiovisual Data Analysis in Sociology. Peter Lang Pub Inc., New York, NY, USA, (2006) 101--113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Wei, J., Wang, X., Tache, R., Peiris, R. L., Choi, Y., Halupka, V., Koh, J. T. K. V., Martinez, X. R., Cheok, A. D., Romão, T., Correia, N., Inami, M., Kato, H.; Prada, R., Terada, T., Dias, A. E., and Chambel, T. (ed.) Food Media: exploring interactive entertainment over telepresent dinner. In Proc Ubicomp 2011, 21--30 ACM, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilcox, J. R. Videoconferencing & Interactive Multimedia: The Whole Picture. Telecom Books, New York, NY, USA, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Williams, S. Savory suppers and fashionable feasts: dining in Victorian America. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TN, USA, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Telematic dinner party: designing for togetherness through play and performance

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '12: Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      June 2012
      828 pages
      ISBN:9781450312103
      DOI:10.1145/2317956

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 June 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader