skip to main content
10.1145/2350190.2350203acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmiddlewareConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Automatic detection of rumor on Sina Weibo

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 August 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

The problem of gauging information credibility on social networks has received considerable attention in recent years. Most previous work has chosen Twitter, the world's largest micro-blogging platform, as the premise of research. In this work, we shift the premise and study the problem of information credibility on Sina Weibo, China's leading micro-blogging service provider. With eight times more users than Twitter, Sina Weibo is more of a Facebook-Twitter hybrid than a pure Twitter clone, and exhibits several important characteristics that distinguish it from Twitter. We collect an extensive set of microblogs which have been confirmed to be false rumors based on information from the official rumor-busting service provided by Sina Weibo. Unlike previous studies on Twitter where the labeling of rumors is done manually by the participants of the experiments, the official nature of this service ensures the high quality of the dataset. We then examine an extensive set of features that can be extracted from the microblogs, and train a classifier to automatically detect the rumors from a mixed set of true information and false information. The experiments show that some of the new features we propose are indeed effective in the classification, and even the features considered in previous studies have different implications with Sina Weibo than with Twitter. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on rumor analysis and detection on Sina Weibo.

References

  1. P. Bordia and N. DiFonzo. Problem solving in social interactions on the internet: Rumor as social cognition. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67(1): 33--49, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. J. Carletta. Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22(2): 249--254, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. C. Castillo, M. Mendoza, and B. Poblete. Information credibility on twitter. In WWW, pages 675--684, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. B. D. Eugenio and M. Glass. The kappa statistic: A second look. Computational Linguistics, 30(1): 95--101, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. T. S. Ferguson. A Course in Large Sample Theory. Chapman and Hall, London, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. A. Hassan, V. Qazvinian, and D. R. Radev. What's with the attitude? identifying sentences with attitude in online discussions. In EMNLP, pages 1245--1255, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Mathioudakis and N. Koudas. Twittermonitor: trend detection over the twitter stream. In Proceedings of the 2010 international conference on Management of data, SIGMOD '10, pages 1155--1158, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Mendoza, B. Poblete, and C. Castillo. Twitter under crisis: can we trust what we rt? In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics, SOMA '10, pages 71--79, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. R. Morris, S. Counts, A. Roseway, A. Hoff, and J. Schwarz. Tweeting is believing?: understanding microblog credibility perceptions. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW '12, pages 441--450, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. W. Peterson and N. Gist. Rumor and public opinion. American Journal of Sociology, pages 159--167, 1951.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. V. Qazvinian, E. Rosengren, D. R. Radev, and Q. Mei. Rumor has it: Identifying misinformation in microblogs. In EMNLP, pages 1589--1599, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Ratkiewicz, M. Conover, M. Meiss, B. Gonçalves, S. Patil, A. Flammini, and F. Menczer. Detecting and tracking the spread of astroturf memes in microblog streams. CoRR, abs/1011.3768, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Automatic detection of rumor on Sina Weibo

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MDS '12: Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Mining Data Semantics
      August 2012
      103 pages
      ISBN:9781450315463
      DOI:10.1145/2350190

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 August 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader