skip to main content
10.1145/2369220.2369248acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesictdConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Collage: a presentation tool for school teachers

Published:13 December 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present Collage, a software application designed for classroom presentations for school teachers in the developing world. An in-depth investigation of teaching practices in several schools in India led us to believe that a simple tool that enabled the display of images and textbook materials while facilitating blackboard-like interactions would be very helpful for these teachers. Collage is a simple media viewer with a small number of features that enables teachers to prepare lessons with little overhead and then present them in classrooms with maximum flexibility. The tool was piloted in three schools in suburban India for use in real-world classroom teaching. All teachers who used Collage uniformly praised it, and students' learning of visual concepts seemed to improve through it. Interestingly, some teachers continue to use the tool now for their own teaching needs and have spontaneously shared it with colleagues from other schools.

References

  1. One Media Player Per Teacher, http://www.ompt.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Microsoft Partners in Learning, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Gates, "Where's the power? What's the point?," Across The Board, vol. 39, 2002, pp. 45--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Williamson, L. Newton, D. Moseley, S. Higgins, R. Bramald, F. Hardman, J. Miller, M. Mroz, H. Tse, D. Newton, and I. Thompson, "Ways forward with ICT: effective pedagogy using information and communications technology for literacy and numeracy in primary schools," http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001369.htm, Sep. 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. K. Shapley, D. Sheehan, C. Maloney, and F. Caranikas-Walker, Evaluation of the Texas Technology Immersion Pilot, Texas Center for Educational Research (TCER): 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. F. Barrera-Osorio and L. Linden, "The Use and Misuse of Computers in Education: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in Colombia," World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Cunningham, K. Kerr, R. McEune, P. Smith, and S. Harris, Laptops for Teachers: an Evaluation of the First Year of the Initiative, ICT in Schools Research and Evaluation Series No. 19: 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. T. Oppenhemier, The Flickering Mind: The False Promise of Technology in the Classroom, Random House, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. L. Linden, Complement or Substitute? The Effect of Technology on Student Achievement in India, Columbia University: 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Banerjee, S. Cole, E. Duflo, and L. Linden, Remedying Education: Evidence from two randomized experiments in India, Poverty Action Lab: 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S. Higgins, G. Beauchamp, and D. Miller, "Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards," Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 32(3), 2007, pp. 213--225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. S. Ainsworth and S. Grimshaw, "Evaluating the REDEEM authoring tool: Can teachers create effective learning environments?," International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 14, 2004, pp. 279--312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. I. Hall and S. Higgins, "Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards," Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 21, 2005, pp. 102--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. D. G. Levasseur and J. K. Sawyer, "Pedagogy Meets PowerPoint: A Research Review of the Effects of Computer-Generated Slides in the Classroom," The Review of Communication, vol. 6(1), Apr. 2006, pp. 101--123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. R. Anderson, R. Anderson, C. Hoyer, and S. Wolfman, "A Study of Digital Ink in Lecture Presentation," Proc. of CHI '04, 2004, pp. 567--574. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. R. Anderson, R. Anderson, P. Davis, N. Linnell, C. Prince, V. Razmov, and F. Videon, "Classroom Presenter: Enhancing Interactive Education with Digital Ink," IEEE Computer, 2007, pp. 56--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. L. Nelson, S. Ichimura, E. Pederson, and L. Adams, "Palette: A Paper interface for Giving Presentations," Proc. of CHI '99, 1999, pp. 354--361. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. B. Signer and M. Norrie, "PaperPoint: A Paper-Based Presentation and Interactive Paper Prototyping Tool," Proc. of TEI '07, 2007, pp. 57--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. T. Parikh, P. Javid, K. Sasikumar, K. Ghosh, and K. Toyama, "Mobile phones and paper documents: evaluating a new approach for capturing microfinance data in rural India," Proc. of CHI 2006, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. K. Chen, H. Chen, N. Conway, H. Dolan, J. Hellerstein, and T. Parikh, "Improving data quality with dynamic forms," International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)d, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. A. Szabo and N. Hastings, "Using IT in the undergraduate classroom: Should we replace the blackboard with PowerPoint?," Computers & Education, vol. 35(3), Nov. 2000, pp. 175--187. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. L. Challoo and J. Bayliss, "Presentation Software as a Lecture Aid in a Fourth Grade Music Class.," Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, San Antonio, USA: AACE, 2007, pp. 2728--2734.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. E. Tufte, The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint, Graphics Press, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. W. Blokzijl and R. Naeff, "The Instructor as Stagehand," Business Communication Quarterly, vol. 67(1), 2004, pp. 70--77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. L. Lichtschlag, T. Karrer, and J. Borchers, "Fly: A Tool to Author Planar Presentations," Proc. CHI '09, 2009, pp. 547--556. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. B. Loch and D. Donovan, "Progressive Teaching of Mathematics with Tablet Technology," e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology (e-JIST), vol. 9(2), 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. K. Sawyer, "Creative Teaching: Collaborative Discussion as Disciplined Improvisation," Educational Researcher, vol. 33(2), 2004, pp. 12--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. S. Panjwani, L. Micallef, K. Fenech, and K. Toyama, "Effects of Integrating Digital Visual Materials with Textbook Scans in the Classroom," International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, vol. 5, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. R. E. Mayer, Multimedia Learning, Cambridge University Press, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICTD '10: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development
    December 2010
    479 pages
    ISBN:9781450307871
    DOI:10.1145/2369220

    Copyright © 2010 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 13 December 2010

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate22of116submissions,19%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader