skip to main content
10.1145/2370216.2370239acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring interspecies sensemaking: dog tracking semiotics and multispecies ethnography

Published:05 September 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

The domestic use of tracking technology with pets is on the rise, yet is under-researched. We investigate how tracking practices reconfigure human-dog relationships changing both humans and dogs. We question the sensemaking mechanisms by which both humans and dogs engage in context-based meaningful exchanges via the technology's mediation. We show how an indexical semiotic perspective could inform the development of interspecies technology. Finally, we discuss the methodological issues raised by doing research with animals and propose an interspecies semiotics which integrates animal companions and animal researchers' accounts into ethnographic observation.

References

  1. Bekoff, M. (2010). The Animal Manifesto: Six Reasons for Expanding our Compassion Footprint. New World Library.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Biosemiotics: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BiosemioticsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Boesen, J., Rode, J. Mancini, C. (2010). The Domestic Panopticon: Location Tracking in Families. Proc. UbiComp '10. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. DEFRA, Wildlife and Pets: defra.gov.uk/wildlife-pets/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Donaldson, J. (2005). The Culture Clash. James & Kenneth Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. GlobalPetFinder: globalpetfinder.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Golbeck, J., Neustaedter, C. (2012). Pet Video Chat: Monitoring and Interacting with Dogs over Distance. Alt CHI 2012. Proc. CHI'12, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Goode, D. (2006). Playing with my Dog Katie: An Ethnomethodological Study of Dog-Human Interaction. Purdue University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Haraway, D. (2008). When Species Meet. University of Minnesota Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Helicopter Parent Your Dog: technologyreview.com/blog/helloworld/27188/?p1=blogsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hu, F., Silver, D. and Trudel, A. (2007) Lonely Dog@Home, Proc. Conf. on Web Int. and Int. Agent Tech, pp. 333--337. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jackson, R., Ahlborn, G. (1989). Snow Leopards (Panthera Unica) in Nepal: Home Range and Movements. National Geographic Research, 5 (2), pp. 161--175.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kirksey, S. E., Helmreich, S. (2010). The Emergence of Multispecies Ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 25 (4), pp. 545--576.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Kohn, E. (2010). How Dogs Dream: Amazonian Natures and the Politics of Transspecies. American Ethnologist, 34 (1), pp. 3--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Lazar, J., Feng, J. H., Hochheiser, H. (2009). Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley-Blackwell. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lee, S. P., Cheok A. D., James T. K. S. (2006). A Mobile Pet Wearable Computer and Mixed Reality System for Human-Poultry Interaction through the Internet. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, v.10, pg. 301--317 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mancini, C. (2011). Animal-Computer Interaction: a Manifesto. ACM Interactions, 18(4), pp. 69--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mancini, C., Rogers, Y., Thomas, K., Joinson, N. A., Price, B. A., Bandara, A. K., Jedrzejczyk, L., Nuseibeh, B. (2011). In the Best Families: Tracking and Relationships. Proc. CHI'11, ACM Press, pp. 2419--2428. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Mankoff, D., Dey, A., Mankoff J., Mankoff, K. (2005). Supporting Interspecies Social Awareness: Using Peripheral Displays for Distributed Pack Awareness. Proc. of UIST '05. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Maynard Smith, J., Harper, D. (2003). Animal Signals. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. McCradle. P., McCune, S., Griffin, J. A., Maholmes, V. (Eds.) (2010). How Animals Affect Us: Examining the Influence of Human-Animal Interaction on Child Development and Human Health. American Physiological Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. McGrath, R. E. (2009). Species-Appropriate Computer Mediated Interaction. Proc. of CHI '09, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Mills, B. (2010). Television Wildlife Documentaries and Animals' Right to Privacy. Continuum, 24(2), pp.193--202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Mills, D. S., De Keuster, T. (2009). Dogs in Society can Prevent Society Going to the Dogs. The Veterinary Journal, 179(3), pp. 322--323.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Noz F., An, J. (2011). Cat Cat Revolution: an Interspecies Gaming Experience. Proc. CHI'11, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Paldanius, M., Kärkkäinen, T., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Juhlin, O., Häkkilä, J. (2011). Communication Technology for Human-Dog Interaction: Exploration of Dog Owners' Experiences and Expectations. Proc. CHI'11. ACM Press, pp. 2631--2640. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Pang, J. F., Kluetsch, C., Zou, X. J., Zhang, A. B., Luo, L. Y., Angleby, H., Ardalan, A., Ekström, C., Sköllermo, A., Lundeberg, J., Matsumura, S., Leitner, T., Zhang, Y. P., Savolainen, P. (2009). mtDNA Data Indicate a Single Origin for Dogs South of Yangtze River, Less than 16,300 Years Ago, from Numerous Wolves. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 26(12), pp. 2849--2864.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Peirce, C. S. (1931-35). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Pet Food Manufacturers Association, Pet Population 2011: pfma.org.uk/statistics/index.cfm?id=83&cat_id=60Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Retrieva: retrievatracking.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. SpotLight: spotlightgps.com/spotlight-gps-pet-locator.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Tagg: pettracker.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Weilenmann, A., Juhlin, O. (2011). Understanding people and animals: the use of a positioning system in ordinary human canine interaction. Proc. CHI'11. ACM Press, pp. 2631--2640. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Wingrave, C. A., Rose, J., Langston, T., LaViola Jr, J. J. (2010). Early Explorations of CAT: Canine Amusement and Training. In CHI 2010: Monsters Attack! Proc. CHI'10, ACM Press, pp. 2661--2664. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploring interspecies sensemaking: dog tracking semiotics and multispecies ethnography

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing
      September 2012
      1268 pages
      ISBN:9781450312240
      DOI:10.1145/2370216

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 September 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      UbiComp '12 Paper Acceptance Rate58of301submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader